Cargando…

Suitability of the HAM-Nat test and TMS module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection

Aims: Tests with natural-scientific content are predictive of the success in the first semesters of medical studies. Some universities in the German speaking countries use the ‘Test for medical studies’ (TMS) for student selection. One of its test modules, namely “medical and scientific comprehensio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hissbach, Johanna, Feddersen, Lena, Sehner, Susanne, Hampe, Wolfgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3525917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23255967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000842
_version_ 1782253476807442432
author Hissbach, Johanna
Feddersen, Lena
Sehner, Susanne
Hampe, Wolfgang
author_facet Hissbach, Johanna
Feddersen, Lena
Sehner, Susanne
Hampe, Wolfgang
author_sort Hissbach, Johanna
collection PubMed
description Aims: Tests with natural-scientific content are predictive of the success in the first semesters of medical studies. Some universities in the German speaking countries use the ‘Test for medical studies’ (TMS) for student selection. One of its test modules, namely “medical and scientific comprehension”, measures the ability for deductive reasoning. In contrast, the Hamburg Assessment Test for Medicine, Natural Sciences (HAM-Nat) evaluates knowledge in natural sciences. In this study the predictive power of the HAM-Nat test will be compared to that of the NatDenk test, which is similar to the TMS module “medical and scientific comprehension” in content and structure. Methods: 162 medical school beginners volunteered to complete either the HAM-Nat (N=77) or the NatDenk test (N=85) in 2007. Until spring 2011, 84.2% of these successfully completed the first part of the medical state examination in Hamburg. Via different logistic regression models we tested the predictive power of high school grade point average (GPA or “Abiturnote”) and the test results (HAM-Nat and NatDenk) with regard to the study success criterion “first part of the medical state examination passed successfully up to the end of the 7(th) semester” (Success7Sem). The Odds Ratios (OR) for study success are reported. Results: For both test groups a significant correlation existed between test results and study success (HAM-Nat: OR=2.07; NatDenk: OR=2.58). If both admission criteria are estimated in one model, the main effects (GPA: OR=2.45; test: OR=2.32) and their interaction effect (OR=1.80) are significant in the HAM-Nat test group, whereas in the NatDenk test group only the test result (OR=2.21) significantly contributes to the variance explained. Conclusions: On their own both HAM-Nat and NatDenk have predictive power for study success, but only the HAM-Nat explains additional variance if combined with GPA. The selection according to HAM-Nat and GPA has under the current circumstances of medical school selection (many good applicants and only a limited number of available spaces) the highest predictive power of all models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3525917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35259172012-12-19 Suitability of the HAM-Nat test and TMS module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection Hissbach, Johanna Feddersen, Lena Sehner, Susanne Hampe, Wolfgang GMS Z Med Ausbild Article Aims: Tests with natural-scientific content are predictive of the success in the first semesters of medical studies. Some universities in the German speaking countries use the ‘Test for medical studies’ (TMS) for student selection. One of its test modules, namely “medical and scientific comprehension”, measures the ability for deductive reasoning. In contrast, the Hamburg Assessment Test for Medicine, Natural Sciences (HAM-Nat) evaluates knowledge in natural sciences. In this study the predictive power of the HAM-Nat test will be compared to that of the NatDenk test, which is similar to the TMS module “medical and scientific comprehension” in content and structure. Methods: 162 medical school beginners volunteered to complete either the HAM-Nat (N=77) or the NatDenk test (N=85) in 2007. Until spring 2011, 84.2% of these successfully completed the first part of the medical state examination in Hamburg. Via different logistic regression models we tested the predictive power of high school grade point average (GPA or “Abiturnote”) and the test results (HAM-Nat and NatDenk) with regard to the study success criterion “first part of the medical state examination passed successfully up to the end of the 7(th) semester” (Success7Sem). The Odds Ratios (OR) for study success are reported. Results: For both test groups a significant correlation existed between test results and study success (HAM-Nat: OR=2.07; NatDenk: OR=2.58). If both admission criteria are estimated in one model, the main effects (GPA: OR=2.45; test: OR=2.32) and their interaction effect (OR=1.80) are significant in the HAM-Nat test group, whereas in the NatDenk test group only the test result (OR=2.21) significantly contributes to the variance explained. Conclusions: On their own both HAM-Nat and NatDenk have predictive power for study success, but only the HAM-Nat explains additional variance if combined with GPA. The selection according to HAM-Nat and GPA has under the current circumstances of medical school selection (many good applicants and only a limited number of available spaces) the highest predictive power of all models. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2012-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3525917/ /pubmed/23255967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000842 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hissbach et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Hissbach, Johanna
Feddersen, Lena
Sehner, Susanne
Hampe, Wolfgang
Suitability of the HAM-Nat test and TMS module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection
title Suitability of the HAM-Nat test and TMS module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection
title_full Suitability of the HAM-Nat test and TMS module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection
title_fullStr Suitability of the HAM-Nat test and TMS module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection
title_full_unstemmed Suitability of the HAM-Nat test and TMS module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection
title_short Suitability of the HAM-Nat test and TMS module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection
title_sort suitability of the ham-nat test and tms module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3525917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23255967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000842
work_keys_str_mv AT hissbachjohanna suitabilityofthehamnattestandtmsmodulebasicmedicalscientificunderstandingformedicalschoolselection
AT feddersenlena suitabilityofthehamnattestandtmsmodulebasicmedicalscientificunderstandingformedicalschoolselection
AT sehnersusanne suitabilityofthehamnattestandtmsmodulebasicmedicalscientificunderstandingformedicalschoolselection
AT hampewolfgang suitabilityofthehamnattestandtmsmodulebasicmedicalscientificunderstandingformedicalschoolselection