Cargando…

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Noninsulin-Using Type 2 Diabetic Patients: It is time to face the evidence

Given the importance of glycemic control in the development of diabetes complications, the plethora of tools now available to monitor the day-to-day trends in glycemia is remarkable. In this regard, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been considered a key component of patient management. Ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malanda, Uriëll L., Bot, Sandra D., Nijpels, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23264289
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0831
_version_ 1782253520349560832
author Malanda, Uriëll L.
Bot, Sandra D.
Nijpels, G.
author_facet Malanda, Uriëll L.
Bot, Sandra D.
Nijpels, G.
author_sort Malanda, Uriëll L.
collection PubMed
description Given the importance of glycemic control in the development of diabetes complications, the plethora of tools now available to monitor the day-to-day trends in glycemia is remarkable. In this regard, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been considered a key component of patient management. Arguably, there remains almost universal agreement that SMBG should be available to all diabetic patients regardless of current treatment strategy. However, recently there have been reports that have challenged the current paradigm that all patients should use SMBG and concluded that SMBG for type 2 diabetic patients not on insulin may not be beneficial on glycemic control and must be weighed against the expense and inconvenience. In this two-part point-counterpoint narrative, Malanda et al. and Polonsky and Fisher take opposing views on the utility of SMBG to be valuable for individuals with type 2 diabetes not using insulin. In the narrative below, Malanda et al. suggest that the evidence for potentially beneficial SMBG-induced effects on glycemic control, hypoglycemic periods, and potential harms in type 2 diabetic patients who are not treated with insulin does not justify the use of SMBG. Moreover, the use of SMBG is associated with huge costs, which should be better redirected to effective strategies to improve health for this category of patients. —William T. Cefalu, md Editor in Chief, Diabetes Care
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3526213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35262132014-01-01 Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Noninsulin-Using Type 2 Diabetic Patients: It is time to face the evidence Malanda, Uriëll L. Bot, Sandra D. Nijpels, G. Diabetes Care Point-Counterpoint Given the importance of glycemic control in the development of diabetes complications, the plethora of tools now available to monitor the day-to-day trends in glycemia is remarkable. In this regard, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) has been considered a key component of patient management. Arguably, there remains almost universal agreement that SMBG should be available to all diabetic patients regardless of current treatment strategy. However, recently there have been reports that have challenged the current paradigm that all patients should use SMBG and concluded that SMBG for type 2 diabetic patients not on insulin may not be beneficial on glycemic control and must be weighed against the expense and inconvenience. In this two-part point-counterpoint narrative, Malanda et al. and Polonsky and Fisher take opposing views on the utility of SMBG to be valuable for individuals with type 2 diabetes not using insulin. In the narrative below, Malanda et al. suggest that the evidence for potentially beneficial SMBG-induced effects on glycemic control, hypoglycemic periods, and potential harms in type 2 diabetic patients who are not treated with insulin does not justify the use of SMBG. Moreover, the use of SMBG is associated with huge costs, which should be better redirected to effective strategies to improve health for this category of patients. —William T. Cefalu, md Editor in Chief, Diabetes Care American Diabetes Association 2013-01 2012-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3526213/ /pubmed/23264289 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0831 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Point-Counterpoint
Malanda, Uriëll L.
Bot, Sandra D.
Nijpels, G.
Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Noninsulin-Using Type 2 Diabetic Patients: It is time to face the evidence
title Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Noninsulin-Using Type 2 Diabetic Patients: It is time to face the evidence
title_full Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Noninsulin-Using Type 2 Diabetic Patients: It is time to face the evidence
title_fullStr Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Noninsulin-Using Type 2 Diabetic Patients: It is time to face the evidence
title_full_unstemmed Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Noninsulin-Using Type 2 Diabetic Patients: It is time to face the evidence
title_short Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Noninsulin-Using Type 2 Diabetic Patients: It is time to face the evidence
title_sort self-monitoring of blood glucose in noninsulin-using type 2 diabetic patients: it is time to face the evidence
topic Point-Counterpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23264289
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0831
work_keys_str_mv AT malandaurielll selfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinnoninsulinusingtype2diabeticpatientsitistimetofacetheevidence
AT botsandrad selfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinnoninsulinusingtype2diabeticpatientsitistimetofacetheevidence
AT nijpelsg selfmonitoringofbloodglucoseinnoninsulinusingtype2diabeticpatientsitistimetofacetheevidence