Cargando…

Is the in vivo dosimetry with the OneDosePlus(TM) system able to detect intra-fraction motion? A retrospective analysis of in vivo data from breast and prostate patients

BACKGROUND: The OneDosePlus(TM) system, based on MOSFET solid-state radiation detectors and a handheld dosimetry reader, has been used to evaluate intra-fraction movements of patients with breast and prostate cancer. METHODS: An Action Threshold (AT), defined as the maximum acceptable discrepancy be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Falco, Maria Daniela, D’Andrea, Marco, Bosco, Alessia Lo, Rebuzzi, Mauro, Ponti, Elisabetta, Tolu, Barbara, Tortorelli, Grazia, Barbarino, Rosaria, Di Murro, Luana, Santoni, Riccardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22716260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-97
_version_ 1782253568500170752
author Falco, Maria Daniela
D’Andrea, Marco
Bosco, Alessia Lo
Rebuzzi, Mauro
Ponti, Elisabetta
Tolu, Barbara
Tortorelli, Grazia
Barbarino, Rosaria
Di Murro, Luana
Santoni, Riccardo
author_facet Falco, Maria Daniela
D’Andrea, Marco
Bosco, Alessia Lo
Rebuzzi, Mauro
Ponti, Elisabetta
Tolu, Barbara
Tortorelli, Grazia
Barbarino, Rosaria
Di Murro, Luana
Santoni, Riccardo
author_sort Falco, Maria Daniela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The OneDosePlus(TM) system, based on MOSFET solid-state radiation detectors and a handheld dosimetry reader, has been used to evaluate intra-fraction movements of patients with breast and prostate cancer. METHODS: An Action Threshold (AT), defined as the maximum acceptable discrepancy between measured dose and dose calculated with the Treatment Planning System (TPS) (for each field) has been determined from phantom data. To investigate the sensitivity of the system to direction of the patient movements, fixed displacements have been simulated in phantom. The AT has been used as an indicator to establish if patients move during a treatment session, after having verified the set-up with 2D and/or 3D images. Phantom tests have been performed matching different linear accelerators and two TPSs (TPS1 and TPS2). RESULTS: The ATs have been found to be very similar (5.0% for TPS1 and 4.5% for TPS2). From statistical data analysis, the system has been found not sensitive enough to reveal displacements smaller than 1 cm (within two standard deviations). The ATs applied to in vivo treatments showed that among the twenty five patients treated for breast cancer, only four of them moved during each measurement session. Splitting data into medial and lateral field, two patients have been found to move during all these sessions; the others, instead, moved only in the second part of the treatment. Patients with prostate cancer have behaved better than patients with breast cancer. Only two out of twenty five moved in each measurement session. CONCLUSIONS: The method described in the paper, easily implemented in the clinical practice, combines all the advantages of in vivo procedures using the OneDosePlus(TM) system with the possibility of detecting intra-fraction patient movements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3526469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35264692013-01-03 Is the in vivo dosimetry with the OneDosePlus(TM) system able to detect intra-fraction motion? A retrospective analysis of in vivo data from breast and prostate patients Falco, Maria Daniela D’Andrea, Marco Bosco, Alessia Lo Rebuzzi, Mauro Ponti, Elisabetta Tolu, Barbara Tortorelli, Grazia Barbarino, Rosaria Di Murro, Luana Santoni, Riccardo Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The OneDosePlus(TM) system, based on MOSFET solid-state radiation detectors and a handheld dosimetry reader, has been used to evaluate intra-fraction movements of patients with breast and prostate cancer. METHODS: An Action Threshold (AT), defined as the maximum acceptable discrepancy between measured dose and dose calculated with the Treatment Planning System (TPS) (for each field) has been determined from phantom data. To investigate the sensitivity of the system to direction of the patient movements, fixed displacements have been simulated in phantom. The AT has been used as an indicator to establish if patients move during a treatment session, after having verified the set-up with 2D and/or 3D images. Phantom tests have been performed matching different linear accelerators and two TPSs (TPS1 and TPS2). RESULTS: The ATs have been found to be very similar (5.0% for TPS1 and 4.5% for TPS2). From statistical data analysis, the system has been found not sensitive enough to reveal displacements smaller than 1 cm (within two standard deviations). The ATs applied to in vivo treatments showed that among the twenty five patients treated for breast cancer, only four of them moved during each measurement session. Splitting data into medial and lateral field, two patients have been found to move during all these sessions; the others, instead, moved only in the second part of the treatment. Patients with prostate cancer have behaved better than patients with breast cancer. Only two out of twenty five moved in each measurement session. CONCLUSIONS: The method described in the paper, easily implemented in the clinical practice, combines all the advantages of in vivo procedures using the OneDosePlus(TM) system with the possibility of detecting intra-fraction patient movements. BioMed Central 2012-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3526469/ /pubmed/22716260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-97 Text en Copyright ©2012 Falco et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Falco, Maria Daniela
D’Andrea, Marco
Bosco, Alessia Lo
Rebuzzi, Mauro
Ponti, Elisabetta
Tolu, Barbara
Tortorelli, Grazia
Barbarino, Rosaria
Di Murro, Luana
Santoni, Riccardo
Is the in vivo dosimetry with the OneDosePlus(TM) system able to detect intra-fraction motion? A retrospective analysis of in vivo data from breast and prostate patients
title Is the in vivo dosimetry with the OneDosePlus(TM) system able to detect intra-fraction motion? A retrospective analysis of in vivo data from breast and prostate patients
title_full Is the in vivo dosimetry with the OneDosePlus(TM) system able to detect intra-fraction motion? A retrospective analysis of in vivo data from breast and prostate patients
title_fullStr Is the in vivo dosimetry with the OneDosePlus(TM) system able to detect intra-fraction motion? A retrospective analysis of in vivo data from breast and prostate patients
title_full_unstemmed Is the in vivo dosimetry with the OneDosePlus(TM) system able to detect intra-fraction motion? A retrospective analysis of in vivo data from breast and prostate patients
title_short Is the in vivo dosimetry with the OneDosePlus(TM) system able to detect intra-fraction motion? A retrospective analysis of in vivo data from breast and prostate patients
title_sort is the in vivo dosimetry with the onedoseplus(tm) system able to detect intra-fraction motion? a retrospective analysis of in vivo data from breast and prostate patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22716260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-97
work_keys_str_mv AT falcomariadaniela istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients
AT dandreamarco istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients
AT boscoalessialo istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients
AT rebuzzimauro istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients
AT pontielisabetta istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients
AT tolubarbara istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients
AT tortorelligrazia istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients
AT barbarinorosaria istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients
AT dimurroluana istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients
AT santoniriccardo istheinvivodosimetrywiththeonedoseplustmsystemabletodetectintrafractionmotionaretrospectiveanalysisofinvivodatafrombreastandprostatepatients