Cargando…
Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers
BACKGROUND: Understanding nosocomial pathogen transmission is restricted by culture limitations. Novel platforms, such as PCR-based electron spray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS), may be useful as investigational tools. METHODS: Traditional clinical microbiology (TCM) and PC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23050585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-252 |
_version_ | 1782253574141509632 |
---|---|
author | Yun, Heather C Kreft, Rachael E Castillo, Mayra A Ehrlich, Garth D Guymon, Charles H Crouch, Helen K Chung, Kevin K Wenke, Joseph C Hsu, Joseph R Spirk, Tracy L Costerton, J William Mende, Katrin Murray, Clinton K |
author_facet | Yun, Heather C Kreft, Rachael E Castillo, Mayra A Ehrlich, Garth D Guymon, Charles H Crouch, Helen K Chung, Kevin K Wenke, Joseph C Hsu, Joseph R Spirk, Tracy L Costerton, J William Mende, Katrin Murray, Clinton K |
author_sort | Yun, Heather C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding nosocomial pathogen transmission is restricted by culture limitations. Novel platforms, such as PCR-based electron spray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS), may be useful as investigational tools. METHODS: Traditional clinical microbiology (TCM) and PCR/ESI-TOF-MS were used to recover and detect microorganisms from the hands and personal protective equipment of 10 burn intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare workers providing clinical care at a tertiary care military referral hospital. High-use environmental surfaces were assessed in 9 burn ICU and 10 orthopedic patient rooms. Clinical cultures during the study period were reviewed for pathogen comparison with investigational molecular diagnostic methods. RESULTS: From 158 samples, 142 organisms were identified by TCM and 718 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. The molecular diagnostic method detected more organisms (4.5 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.01) from 99% vs. 67% of samples (p < 0.01). TCM detected S. aureus in 13 samples vs. 21 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. Gram-negative organisms were less commonly identified than gram-positive by both methods; especially by TCM. Among all detected bacterial species, similar percentages were typical nosocomial pathogens (18-19%) for TCM vs. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS also detected mecA in 112 samples, vanA in 13, and KPC-3 in 2. MecA was associated (p < 0.01) with codetection of coagulase negative staphylococci but not S. aureus. No vanA was codetected with enterococci; one KPC-3 was detected without Klebsiella spp. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, PCR/ESI-TOF-MS detected more organisms, especially gram-negatives, compared to TCM, but the current assay format is limited by the number of antibiotic resistance determinants it covers. Further large-scale assessments of PCR/ESI-TOF-MS for hospital surveillance are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3526496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35264962012-12-20 Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers Yun, Heather C Kreft, Rachael E Castillo, Mayra A Ehrlich, Garth D Guymon, Charles H Crouch, Helen K Chung, Kevin K Wenke, Joseph C Hsu, Joseph R Spirk, Tracy L Costerton, J William Mende, Katrin Murray, Clinton K BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding nosocomial pathogen transmission is restricted by culture limitations. Novel platforms, such as PCR-based electron spray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS), may be useful as investigational tools. METHODS: Traditional clinical microbiology (TCM) and PCR/ESI-TOF-MS were used to recover and detect microorganisms from the hands and personal protective equipment of 10 burn intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare workers providing clinical care at a tertiary care military referral hospital. High-use environmental surfaces were assessed in 9 burn ICU and 10 orthopedic patient rooms. Clinical cultures during the study period were reviewed for pathogen comparison with investigational molecular diagnostic methods. RESULTS: From 158 samples, 142 organisms were identified by TCM and 718 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. The molecular diagnostic method detected more organisms (4.5 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.01) from 99% vs. 67% of samples (p < 0.01). TCM detected S. aureus in 13 samples vs. 21 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. Gram-negative organisms were less commonly identified than gram-positive by both methods; especially by TCM. Among all detected bacterial species, similar percentages were typical nosocomial pathogens (18-19%) for TCM vs. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS also detected mecA in 112 samples, vanA in 13, and KPC-3 in 2. MecA was associated (p < 0.01) with codetection of coagulase negative staphylococci but not S. aureus. No vanA was codetected with enterococci; one KPC-3 was detected without Klebsiella spp. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, PCR/ESI-TOF-MS detected more organisms, especially gram-negatives, compared to TCM, but the current assay format is limited by the number of antibiotic resistance determinants it covers. Further large-scale assessments of PCR/ESI-TOF-MS for hospital surveillance are warranted. BioMed Central 2012-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3526496/ /pubmed/23050585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-252 Text en Copyright ©2012 Yun et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yun, Heather C Kreft, Rachael E Castillo, Mayra A Ehrlich, Garth D Guymon, Charles H Crouch, Helen K Chung, Kevin K Wenke, Joseph C Hsu, Joseph R Spirk, Tracy L Costerton, J William Mende, Katrin Murray, Clinton K Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers |
title | Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers |
title_full | Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers |
title_fullStr | Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers |
title_short | Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers |
title_sort | comparison of pcr/electron spray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry versus traditional clinical microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526496/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23050585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yunheatherc comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT kreftrachaele comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT castillomayraa comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT ehrlichgarthd comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT guymoncharlesh comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT crouchhelenk comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT chungkevink comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT wenkejosephc comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT hsujosephr comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT spirktracyl comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT costertonjwilliam comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT mendekatrin comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers AT murrayclintonk comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers |