Cargando…

Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers

BACKGROUND: Understanding nosocomial pathogen transmission is restricted by culture limitations. Novel platforms, such as PCR-based electron spray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS), may be useful as investigational tools. METHODS: Traditional clinical microbiology (TCM) and PC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yun, Heather C, Kreft, Rachael E, Castillo, Mayra A, Ehrlich, Garth D, Guymon, Charles H, Crouch, Helen K, Chung, Kevin K, Wenke, Joseph C, Hsu, Joseph R, Spirk, Tracy L, Costerton, J William, Mende, Katrin, Murray, Clinton K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23050585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-252
_version_ 1782253574141509632
author Yun, Heather C
Kreft, Rachael E
Castillo, Mayra A
Ehrlich, Garth D
Guymon, Charles H
Crouch, Helen K
Chung, Kevin K
Wenke, Joseph C
Hsu, Joseph R
Spirk, Tracy L
Costerton, J William
Mende, Katrin
Murray, Clinton K
author_facet Yun, Heather C
Kreft, Rachael E
Castillo, Mayra A
Ehrlich, Garth D
Guymon, Charles H
Crouch, Helen K
Chung, Kevin K
Wenke, Joseph C
Hsu, Joseph R
Spirk, Tracy L
Costerton, J William
Mende, Katrin
Murray, Clinton K
author_sort Yun, Heather C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding nosocomial pathogen transmission is restricted by culture limitations. Novel platforms, such as PCR-based electron spray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS), may be useful as investigational tools. METHODS: Traditional clinical microbiology (TCM) and PCR/ESI-TOF-MS were used to recover and detect microorganisms from the hands and personal protective equipment of 10 burn intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare workers providing clinical care at a tertiary care military referral hospital. High-use environmental surfaces were assessed in 9 burn ICU and 10 orthopedic patient rooms. Clinical cultures during the study period were reviewed for pathogen comparison with investigational molecular diagnostic methods. RESULTS: From 158 samples, 142 organisms were identified by TCM and 718 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. The molecular diagnostic method detected more organisms (4.5 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.01) from 99% vs. 67% of samples (p < 0.01). TCM detected S. aureus in 13 samples vs. 21 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. Gram-negative organisms were less commonly identified than gram-positive by both methods; especially by TCM. Among all detected bacterial species, similar percentages were typical nosocomial pathogens (18-19%) for TCM vs. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS also detected mecA in 112 samples, vanA in 13, and KPC-3 in 2. MecA was associated (p < 0.01) with codetection of coagulase negative staphylococci but not S. aureus. No vanA was codetected with enterococci; one KPC-3 was detected without Klebsiella spp. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, PCR/ESI-TOF-MS detected more organisms, especially gram-negatives, compared to TCM, but the current assay format is limited by the number of antibiotic resistance determinants it covers. Further large-scale assessments of PCR/ESI-TOF-MS for hospital surveillance are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3526496
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35264962012-12-20 Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers Yun, Heather C Kreft, Rachael E Castillo, Mayra A Ehrlich, Garth D Guymon, Charles H Crouch, Helen K Chung, Kevin K Wenke, Joseph C Hsu, Joseph R Spirk, Tracy L Costerton, J William Mende, Katrin Murray, Clinton K BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Understanding nosocomial pathogen transmission is restricted by culture limitations. Novel platforms, such as PCR-based electron spray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS), may be useful as investigational tools. METHODS: Traditional clinical microbiology (TCM) and PCR/ESI-TOF-MS were used to recover and detect microorganisms from the hands and personal protective equipment of 10 burn intensive care unit (ICU) healthcare workers providing clinical care at a tertiary care military referral hospital. High-use environmental surfaces were assessed in 9 burn ICU and 10 orthopedic patient rooms. Clinical cultures during the study period were reviewed for pathogen comparison with investigational molecular diagnostic methods. RESULTS: From 158 samples, 142 organisms were identified by TCM and 718 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. The molecular diagnostic method detected more organisms (4.5 ± 2.1 vs. 0.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.01) from 99% vs. 67% of samples (p < 0.01). TCM detected S. aureus in 13 samples vs. 21 by PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. Gram-negative organisms were less commonly identified than gram-positive by both methods; especially by TCM. Among all detected bacterial species, similar percentages were typical nosocomial pathogens (18-19%) for TCM vs. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS. PCR/ESI-TOF-MS also detected mecA in 112 samples, vanA in 13, and KPC-3 in 2. MecA was associated (p < 0.01) with codetection of coagulase negative staphylococci but not S. aureus. No vanA was codetected with enterococci; one KPC-3 was detected without Klebsiella spp. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, PCR/ESI-TOF-MS detected more organisms, especially gram-negatives, compared to TCM, but the current assay format is limited by the number of antibiotic resistance determinants it covers. Further large-scale assessments of PCR/ESI-TOF-MS for hospital surveillance are warranted. BioMed Central 2012-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3526496/ /pubmed/23050585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-252 Text en Copyright ©2012 Yun et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yun, Heather C
Kreft, Rachael E
Castillo, Mayra A
Ehrlich, Garth D
Guymon, Charles H
Crouch, Helen K
Chung, Kevin K
Wenke, Joseph C
Hsu, Joseph R
Spirk, Tracy L
Costerton, J William
Mende, Katrin
Murray, Clinton K
Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers
title Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers
title_full Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers
title_fullStr Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers
title_short Comparison of PCR/Electron spray Ionization-Time-of-Flight-Mass Spectrometry versus Traditional Clinical Microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers
title_sort comparison of pcr/electron spray ionization-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry versus traditional clinical microbiology for active surveillance of organisms contaminating high-use surfaces in a burn intensive care unit, an orthopedic ward and healthcare workers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526496/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23050585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-252
work_keys_str_mv AT yunheatherc comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT kreftrachaele comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT castillomayraa comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT ehrlichgarthd comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT guymoncharlesh comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT crouchhelenk comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT chungkevink comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT wenkejosephc comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT hsujosephr comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT spirktracyl comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT costertonjwilliam comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT mendekatrin comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers
AT murrayclintonk comparisonofpcrelectronsprayionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryversustraditionalclinicalmicrobiologyforactivesurveillanceoforganismscontaminatinghighusesurfacesinaburnintensivecareunitanorthopedicwardandhealthcareworkers