Cargando…
The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND: To assess the blood pressure and lipid-lowering efficacy and tolerability of ‘polypills’ used in cardiovascular disease prevention trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Search strategy: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23284906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052145 |
_version_ | 1782253594630684672 |
---|---|
author | Elley, C Raina Gupta, Ajay K. Webster, Ruth Selak, Vanessa Jun, Min Patel, Anushka Rodgers, Anthony Thom, Simon |
author_facet | Elley, C Raina Gupta, Ajay K. Webster, Ruth Selak, Vanessa Jun, Min Patel, Anushka Rodgers, Anthony Thom, Simon |
author_sort | Elley, C Raina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To assess the blood pressure and lipid-lowering efficacy and tolerability of ‘polypills’ used in cardiovascular disease prevention trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Search strategy: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and PubMed databases were searched for eligible trials. Study inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration, which compared a ‘polypill’ (that included at least one anti-hypertensive and one lipid-lowering medication) with a placebo (or one active component). Outcome measures: Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and total and LDL-cholesterol; discontinuation of study medication and reported adverse effects. Of 44 potentially eligible studies, six trials (including 2,218 patients without previous cardiovascular disease) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, ‘polypills’ reduced systolic blood pressure by −9.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI): −13.4, −5.0) diastolic blood pressure by −5.0 mmHg (95%CI: −7.4, −2.6), total cholesterol by −1.22 mmol/L (95%CI: −1.60, −0.84) and LDL-cholesterol by −1.02 mmol/L (95%CI: −1.37, −0.67). However, those taking a ‘polypill’ (vs. placebo or component) were more likely to discontinue medication (20% vs 14%) (Odds ratio: 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.9)). There was no significant difference in reported adverse effects amongst those on a ‘polypill’ (36% vs. 28%) (OR: 1.3 (95%CI: 0.7, 2.5)). There was high statistical heterogeneity in comparisons for blood pressure and lipid-lowering but use of random-effects and quality-effects models produced very similar results. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Compared with placebo, the ‘polypills’ reduced blood pressure and lipids. Tolerability was lower amongst those on ‘polypills’ than those on placebo or one component, but differences were moderate. Effectiveness trials are needed to help clarify the status of ‘polypills’ in primary care and prevention strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3526586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35265862013-01-02 The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Elley, C Raina Gupta, Ajay K. Webster, Ruth Selak, Vanessa Jun, Min Patel, Anushka Rodgers, Anthony Thom, Simon PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the blood pressure and lipid-lowering efficacy and tolerability of ‘polypills’ used in cardiovascular disease prevention trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Search strategy: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and PubMed databases were searched for eligible trials. Study inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration, which compared a ‘polypill’ (that included at least one anti-hypertensive and one lipid-lowering medication) with a placebo (or one active component). Outcome measures: Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and total and LDL-cholesterol; discontinuation of study medication and reported adverse effects. Of 44 potentially eligible studies, six trials (including 2,218 patients without previous cardiovascular disease) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, ‘polypills’ reduced systolic blood pressure by −9.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI): −13.4, −5.0) diastolic blood pressure by −5.0 mmHg (95%CI: −7.4, −2.6), total cholesterol by −1.22 mmol/L (95%CI: −1.60, −0.84) and LDL-cholesterol by −1.02 mmol/L (95%CI: −1.37, −0.67). However, those taking a ‘polypill’ (vs. placebo or component) were more likely to discontinue medication (20% vs 14%) (Odds ratio: 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.9)). There was no significant difference in reported adverse effects amongst those on a ‘polypill’ (36% vs. 28%) (OR: 1.3 (95%CI: 0.7, 2.5)). There was high statistical heterogeneity in comparisons for blood pressure and lipid-lowering but use of random-effects and quality-effects models produced very similar results. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Compared with placebo, the ‘polypills’ reduced blood pressure and lipids. Tolerability was lower amongst those on ‘polypills’ than those on placebo or one component, but differences were moderate. Effectiveness trials are needed to help clarify the status of ‘polypills’ in primary care and prevention strategies. Public Library of Science 2012-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3526586/ /pubmed/23284906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052145 Text en © 2012 Elley et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Elley, C Raina Gupta, Ajay K. Webster, Ruth Selak, Vanessa Jun, Min Patel, Anushka Rodgers, Anthony Thom, Simon The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title | The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_full | The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_short | The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy and tolerability of ‘polypills’: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23284906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elleycraina theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT guptaajayk theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT websterruth theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT selakvanessa theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT junmin theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT patelanushka theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT rodgersanthony theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT thomsimon theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT elleycraina efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT guptaajayk efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT websterruth efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT selakvanessa efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT junmin efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT patelanushka efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT rodgersanthony efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT thomsimon efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |