Cargando…

The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: To assess the blood pressure and lipid-lowering efficacy and tolerability of ‘polypills’ used in cardiovascular disease prevention trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Search strategy: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elley, C Raina, Gupta, Ajay K., Webster, Ruth, Selak, Vanessa, Jun, Min, Patel, Anushka, Rodgers, Anthony, Thom, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23284906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052145
_version_ 1782253594630684672
author Elley, C Raina
Gupta, Ajay K.
Webster, Ruth
Selak, Vanessa
Jun, Min
Patel, Anushka
Rodgers, Anthony
Thom, Simon
author_facet Elley, C Raina
Gupta, Ajay K.
Webster, Ruth
Selak, Vanessa
Jun, Min
Patel, Anushka
Rodgers, Anthony
Thom, Simon
author_sort Elley, C Raina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the blood pressure and lipid-lowering efficacy and tolerability of ‘polypills’ used in cardiovascular disease prevention trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Search strategy: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and PubMed databases were searched for eligible trials. Study inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration, which compared a ‘polypill’ (that included at least one anti-hypertensive and one lipid-lowering medication) with a placebo (or one active component). Outcome measures: Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and total and LDL-cholesterol; discontinuation of study medication and reported adverse effects. Of 44 potentially eligible studies, six trials (including 2,218 patients without previous cardiovascular disease) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, ‘polypills’ reduced systolic blood pressure by −9.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI): −13.4, −5.0) diastolic blood pressure by −5.0 mmHg (95%CI: −7.4, −2.6), total cholesterol by −1.22 mmol/L (95%CI: −1.60, −0.84) and LDL-cholesterol by −1.02 mmol/L (95%CI: −1.37, −0.67). However, those taking a ‘polypill’ (vs. placebo or component) were more likely to discontinue medication (20% vs 14%) (Odds ratio: 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.9)). There was no significant difference in reported adverse effects amongst those on a ‘polypill’ (36% vs. 28%) (OR: 1.3 (95%CI: 0.7, 2.5)). There was high statistical heterogeneity in comparisons for blood pressure and lipid-lowering but use of random-effects and quality-effects models produced very similar results. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Compared with placebo, the ‘polypills’ reduced blood pressure and lipids. Tolerability was lower amongst those on ‘polypills’ than those on placebo or one component, but differences were moderate. Effectiveness trials are needed to help clarify the status of ‘polypills’ in primary care and prevention strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3526586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35265862013-01-02 The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Elley, C Raina Gupta, Ajay K. Webster, Ruth Selak, Vanessa Jun, Min Patel, Anushka Rodgers, Anthony Thom, Simon PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the blood pressure and lipid-lowering efficacy and tolerability of ‘polypills’ used in cardiovascular disease prevention trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Search strategy: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, and PubMed databases were searched for eligible trials. Study inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trials of at least six weeks duration, which compared a ‘polypill’ (that included at least one anti-hypertensive and one lipid-lowering medication) with a placebo (or one active component). Outcome measures: Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and total and LDL-cholesterol; discontinuation of study medication and reported adverse effects. Of 44 potentially eligible studies, six trials (including 2,218 patients without previous cardiovascular disease) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, ‘polypills’ reduced systolic blood pressure by −9.2 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI): −13.4, −5.0) diastolic blood pressure by −5.0 mmHg (95%CI: −7.4, −2.6), total cholesterol by −1.22 mmol/L (95%CI: −1.60, −0.84) and LDL-cholesterol by −1.02 mmol/L (95%CI: −1.37, −0.67). However, those taking a ‘polypill’ (vs. placebo or component) were more likely to discontinue medication (20% vs 14%) (Odds ratio: 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2, 1.9)). There was no significant difference in reported adverse effects amongst those on a ‘polypill’ (36% vs. 28%) (OR: 1.3 (95%CI: 0.7, 2.5)). There was high statistical heterogeneity in comparisons for blood pressure and lipid-lowering but use of random-effects and quality-effects models produced very similar results. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Compared with placebo, the ‘polypills’ reduced blood pressure and lipids. Tolerability was lower amongst those on ‘polypills’ than those on placebo or one component, but differences were moderate. Effectiveness trials are needed to help clarify the status of ‘polypills’ in primary care and prevention strategies. Public Library of Science 2012-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3526586/ /pubmed/23284906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052145 Text en © 2012 Elley et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elley, C Raina
Gupta, Ajay K.
Webster, Ruth
Selak, Vanessa
Jun, Min
Patel, Anushka
Rodgers, Anthony
Thom, Simon
The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_full The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_short The Efficacy and Tolerability of ‘Polypills’: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and tolerability of ‘polypills’: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23284906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052145
work_keys_str_mv AT elleycraina theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT guptaajayk theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT websterruth theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT selakvanessa theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT junmin theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT patelanushka theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT rodgersanthony theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT thomsimon theefficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT elleycraina efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT guptaajayk efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT websterruth efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT selakvanessa efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT junmin efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT patelanushka efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT rodgersanthony efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT thomsimon efficacyandtolerabilityofpolypillsmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials