Cargando…

High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND: High-intensity (high-pressure and high backup rate) noninvasive ventilation has recently been advocated for the management of stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the relative contributions of high inspiratory pressure and high backup rate to ventilat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Patrick B, Brignall, Kate, Moxham, John, Polkey, Michael I, Davidson, A Craig, Hart, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23271905
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S36151
_version_ 1782253633386053632
author Murphy, Patrick B
Brignall, Kate
Moxham, John
Polkey, Michael I
Davidson, A Craig
Hart, Nicholas
author_facet Murphy, Patrick B
Brignall, Kate
Moxham, John
Polkey, Michael I
Davidson, A Craig
Hart, Nicholas
author_sort Murphy, Patrick B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High-intensity (high-pressure and high backup rate) noninvasive ventilation has recently been advocated for the management of stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the relative contributions of high inspiratory pressure and high backup rate to ventilator adherence and physiological outcome have not been investigated. METHODS: Patients with stable hypercapnic COPD (daytime PaCO(2) > 6 kPa) and nocturnal hypoventilation were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to high-pressure and high backup rate (high-intensity) and high-pressure and low backup rate (high-pressure) for a 6-week period. At the end of the first treatment period, patients were switched to the alternative treatment. The primary outcome measure was mean nightly ventilator usage. RESULTS: Twelve patients were recruited, with seven completing the 12-week trial protocol. The mean patient age was 71 ± 8 years, with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1))/forced vital capacity (FVC) of 50% ± 13% and FEV(1) of 32% ± 12%. The baseline PaCO(2) and PaO(2) were 8.6 ± 1.7 kPa and 7.3 ± 1.4 kPa, respectively. There was no significant difference demonstrated in mean nightly ventilator usage between the high-intensity and high-pressure groups (difference of 4 minutes; 95% confidence interval −45 to 53; P = 0.9). Furthermore, there were no differences in any of the secondary endpoints, with the exception of the respiratory domain of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire, which was lower in the high-intensity arm than in the high-pressure arm (57 ± 11 versus 69 ± 16; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no additional benefit, in terms of night-time ventilator adherence or any of the other measured parameters, demonstrated by addition of a high backup rate to high-pressure noninvasive ventilation. These data suggest that it is the high-pressure component of the high-intensity noninvasive ventilation approach that plays the important therapeutic role in the management of hypercapnic respiratory failure in COPD patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3526870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35268702012-12-27 High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial Murphy, Patrick B Brignall, Kate Moxham, John Polkey, Michael I Davidson, A Craig Hart, Nicholas Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: High-intensity (high-pressure and high backup rate) noninvasive ventilation has recently been advocated for the management of stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the relative contributions of high inspiratory pressure and high backup rate to ventilator adherence and physiological outcome have not been investigated. METHODS: Patients with stable hypercapnic COPD (daytime PaCO(2) > 6 kPa) and nocturnal hypoventilation were enrolled. Patients were randomly allocated to high-pressure and high backup rate (high-intensity) and high-pressure and low backup rate (high-pressure) for a 6-week period. At the end of the first treatment period, patients were switched to the alternative treatment. The primary outcome measure was mean nightly ventilator usage. RESULTS: Twelve patients were recruited, with seven completing the 12-week trial protocol. The mean patient age was 71 ± 8 years, with a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1))/forced vital capacity (FVC) of 50% ± 13% and FEV(1) of 32% ± 12%. The baseline PaCO(2) and PaO(2) were 8.6 ± 1.7 kPa and 7.3 ± 1.4 kPa, respectively. There was no significant difference demonstrated in mean nightly ventilator usage between the high-intensity and high-pressure groups (difference of 4 minutes; 95% confidence interval −45 to 53; P = 0.9). Furthermore, there were no differences in any of the secondary endpoints, with the exception of the respiratory domain of the Severe Respiratory Insufficiency questionnaire, which was lower in the high-intensity arm than in the high-pressure arm (57 ± 11 versus 69 ± 16; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no additional benefit, in terms of night-time ventilator adherence or any of the other measured parameters, demonstrated by addition of a high backup rate to high-pressure noninvasive ventilation. These data suggest that it is the high-pressure component of the high-intensity noninvasive ventilation approach that plays the important therapeutic role in the management of hypercapnic respiratory failure in COPD patients. Dove Medical Press 2012 2012-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3526870/ /pubmed/23271905 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S36151 Text en © 2012 Murphy et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Murphy, Patrick B
Brignall, Kate
Moxham, John
Polkey, Michael I
Davidson, A Craig
Hart, Nicholas
High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial
title High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial
title_full High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial
title_fullStr High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial
title_short High pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial
title_sort high pressure versus high intensity noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized crossover trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3526870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23271905
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S36151
work_keys_str_mv AT murphypatrickb highpressureversushighintensitynoninvasiveventilationinstablehypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcrossovertrial
AT brignallkate highpressureversushighintensitynoninvasiveventilationinstablehypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcrossovertrial
AT moxhamjohn highpressureversushighintensitynoninvasiveventilationinstablehypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcrossovertrial
AT polkeymichaeli highpressureversushighintensitynoninvasiveventilationinstablehypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcrossovertrial
AT davidsonacraig highpressureversushighintensitynoninvasiveventilationinstablehypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcrossovertrial
AT hartnicholas highpressureversushighintensitynoninvasiveventilationinstablehypercapnicchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasearandomizedcrossovertrial