Cargando…

Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types

BACKGROUND: The classic determination of burnout is by means of the dimensions exhaustion, cynicism and inefficacy. A new definition of the syndrome is based on clinical subtypes, consisting of “frenetic” (involved, ambitious, overloaded), “underchallenged” (indifferent, bored, with lack of personal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montero-Marín, Jesús, Araya, Ricardo, Blazquez, Barbara Olivan, Skapinakis, Petros, Vizcaino, Vicente Martinez, García-Campayo, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3527159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-922
_version_ 1782253663763300352
author Montero-Marín, Jesús
Araya, Ricardo
Blazquez, Barbara Olivan
Skapinakis, Petros
Vizcaino, Vicente Martinez
García-Campayo, Javier
author_facet Montero-Marín, Jesús
Araya, Ricardo
Blazquez, Barbara Olivan
Skapinakis, Petros
Vizcaino, Vicente Martinez
García-Campayo, Javier
author_sort Montero-Marín, Jesús
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The classic determination of burnout is by means of the dimensions exhaustion, cynicism and inefficacy. A new definition of the syndrome is based on clinical subtypes, consisting of “frenetic” (involved, ambitious, overloaded), “underchallenged” (indifferent, bored, with lack of personal development) and “worn-out” (neglectful, unacknowledged, with little control). The dimensions of overload, lack of development and neglect form a shortened version of this perspective. The aims of this study were to estimate and to compare the explanatory power of both typological models, short and long, with the standard measurement. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey with a randomly sample of university employees (n=409). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the “Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey” (MBI-GS) dimensions, as dependent variables, and the “Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire” (BCSQ-36 and BCSQ-12) dimensions, as independent variables. RESULTS: The BCSQ-36 subscales together explained 53% of ‘exhaustion’ (p<0.001), 59% of ‘cynicism’ (p<0.001) and 37% of ‘efficacy’ (p<0.001), while BCSQ-12 subscales explained 44% of ‘exhaustion’ (p<0.001), 44% of ‘cynicism’ (p<0.001), and 30% of ‘efficacy’ (p<0.001). The difference in the explanatory power of both models was significant for ‘exhaustion’ (p<0.001), and for ‘cynicism’ (p<0.001) and ‘efficacy (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both BCSQ-36 and BCSQ-12 demonstrate great explanatory power over the standard MBI-GS, while offering a useful characterization of the syndrome for the evaluation and design of interventions tailored to the characteristics of each individual. The BCSQ-36 may be very useful in mental health services, given that it provides a good deal of information, while the BCSQ-12 could be used as a screening measure in primary care consultations owing to its simplicity and functional nature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3527159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35271592012-12-21 Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types Montero-Marín, Jesús Araya, Ricardo Blazquez, Barbara Olivan Skapinakis, Petros Vizcaino, Vicente Martinez García-Campayo, Javier BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The classic determination of burnout is by means of the dimensions exhaustion, cynicism and inefficacy. A new definition of the syndrome is based on clinical subtypes, consisting of “frenetic” (involved, ambitious, overloaded), “underchallenged” (indifferent, bored, with lack of personal development) and “worn-out” (neglectful, unacknowledged, with little control). The dimensions of overload, lack of development and neglect form a shortened version of this perspective. The aims of this study were to estimate and to compare the explanatory power of both typological models, short and long, with the standard measurement. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey with a randomly sample of university employees (n=409). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the “Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey” (MBI-GS) dimensions, as dependent variables, and the “Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire” (BCSQ-36 and BCSQ-12) dimensions, as independent variables. RESULTS: The BCSQ-36 subscales together explained 53% of ‘exhaustion’ (p<0.001), 59% of ‘cynicism’ (p<0.001) and 37% of ‘efficacy’ (p<0.001), while BCSQ-12 subscales explained 44% of ‘exhaustion’ (p<0.001), 44% of ‘cynicism’ (p<0.001), and 30% of ‘efficacy’ (p<0.001). The difference in the explanatory power of both models was significant for ‘exhaustion’ (p<0.001), and for ‘cynicism’ (p<0.001) and ‘efficacy (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both BCSQ-36 and BCSQ-12 demonstrate great explanatory power over the standard MBI-GS, while offering a useful characterization of the syndrome for the evaluation and design of interventions tailored to the characteristics of each individual. The BCSQ-36 may be very useful in mental health services, given that it provides a good deal of information, while the BCSQ-12 could be used as a screening measure in primary care consultations owing to its simplicity and functional nature. BioMed Central 2012-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3527159/ /pubmed/23110723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-922 Text en Copyright ©2012 Montero-Marin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Montero-Marín, Jesús
Araya, Ricardo
Blazquez, Barbara Olivan
Skapinakis, Petros
Vizcaino, Vicente Martinez
García-Campayo, Javier
Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types
title Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types
title_full Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types
title_fullStr Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types
title_full_unstemmed Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types
title_short Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types
title_sort understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3527159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-922
work_keys_str_mv AT monteromarinjesus understandingburnoutaccordingtoindividualdifferencesongoingexplanatorypowerevaluationoftwomodelsformeasuringburnouttypes
AT arayaricardo understandingburnoutaccordingtoindividualdifferencesongoingexplanatorypowerevaluationoftwomodelsformeasuringburnouttypes
AT blazquezbarbaraolivan understandingburnoutaccordingtoindividualdifferencesongoingexplanatorypowerevaluationoftwomodelsformeasuringburnouttypes
AT skapinakispetros understandingburnoutaccordingtoindividualdifferencesongoingexplanatorypowerevaluationoftwomodelsformeasuringburnouttypes
AT vizcainovicentemartinez understandingburnoutaccordingtoindividualdifferencesongoingexplanatorypowerevaluationoftwomodelsformeasuringburnouttypes
AT garciacampayojavier understandingburnoutaccordingtoindividualdifferencesongoingexplanatorypowerevaluationoftwomodelsformeasuringburnouttypes