Cargando…

Structural MRI in Frontotemporal Dementia: Comparisons between Hippocampal Volumetry, Tensor-Based Morphometry and Voxel-Based Morphometry

BACKGROUND: MRI is an important clinical tool for diagnosing dementia-like diseases such as Frontemporal Dementia (FTD). However there is a need to develop more accurate and standardized MRI analysis methods. OBJECTIVE: To compare FTD with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel Ángel, Hartikainen, Päivi, Koikkalainen, Juha, Wolz, Robin, Julkunen, Valtteri, Niskanen, Eini, Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa, Kivipelto, Miia, Vanninen, Ritva, Rueckert, Daniel, Liu, Yawu, Lötjönen, Jyrki, Soininen, Hilkka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3527560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23285078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052531
_version_ 1782253750423912448
author Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel Ángel
Hartikainen, Päivi
Koikkalainen, Juha
Wolz, Robin
Julkunen, Valtteri
Niskanen, Eini
Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa
Kivipelto, Miia
Vanninen, Ritva
Rueckert, Daniel
Liu, Yawu
Lötjönen, Jyrki
Soininen, Hilkka
author_facet Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel Ángel
Hartikainen, Päivi
Koikkalainen, Juha
Wolz, Robin
Julkunen, Valtteri
Niskanen, Eini
Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa
Kivipelto, Miia
Vanninen, Ritva
Rueckert, Daniel
Liu, Yawu
Lötjönen, Jyrki
Soininen, Hilkka
author_sort Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel Ángel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: MRI is an important clinical tool for diagnosing dementia-like diseases such as Frontemporal Dementia (FTD). However there is a need to develop more accurate and standardized MRI analysis methods. OBJECTIVE: To compare FTD with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) with three automatic MRI analysis methods - Hippocampal Volumetry (HV), Tensor-based Morphometry (TBM) and Voxel-based Morphometry (VBM), in specific regions of interest in order to determine the highest classification accuracy. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with FTD, 46 patients with AD, 26 control subjects, 16 patients with progressive MCI (PMCI) and 48 patients with stable MCI (SMCI) were examined with HV, TBM for shape change, and VBM for gray matter density. We calculated the Correct Classification Rate (CCR), sensitivity (SS) and specificity (SP) between the study groups. RESULTS: We found unequivocal results differentiating controls from FTD with HV (hippocampus left side) (CCR = 0.83; SS = 0.84; SP = 0.80), with TBM (hippocampus and amygdala (CCR = 0.80/SS = 0.71/SP = 0.94), and with VBM (all the regions studied, especially in lateral ventricle frontal horn, central part and occipital horn) (CCR = 0.87/SS = 0.81/SP = 0.96). VBM achieved the highest accuracy in differentiating AD and FTD (CCR = 0.72/SS = 0.67/SP = 0.76), particularly in lateral ventricle (frontal horn, central part and occipital horn) (CCR = 0.73), whereas TBM in superior frontal gyrus also achieved a high accuracy (CCR = 0.71/SS = 0.68/SP = 0.73). TBM resulted in low accuracy (CCR = 0.62) in the differentiation of AD from FTD using all regions of interest, with similar results for HV (CCR = 0.55). CONCLUSION: Hippocampal atrophy is present not only in AD but also in FTD. Of the methods used, VBM achieved the highest accuracy in its ability to differentiate between FTD and AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3527560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35275602013-01-02 Structural MRI in Frontotemporal Dementia: Comparisons between Hippocampal Volumetry, Tensor-Based Morphometry and Voxel-Based Morphometry Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel Ángel Hartikainen, Päivi Koikkalainen, Juha Wolz, Robin Julkunen, Valtteri Niskanen, Eini Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa Kivipelto, Miia Vanninen, Ritva Rueckert, Daniel Liu, Yawu Lötjönen, Jyrki Soininen, Hilkka PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: MRI is an important clinical tool for diagnosing dementia-like diseases such as Frontemporal Dementia (FTD). However there is a need to develop more accurate and standardized MRI analysis methods. OBJECTIVE: To compare FTD with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) with three automatic MRI analysis methods - Hippocampal Volumetry (HV), Tensor-based Morphometry (TBM) and Voxel-based Morphometry (VBM), in specific regions of interest in order to determine the highest classification accuracy. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with FTD, 46 patients with AD, 26 control subjects, 16 patients with progressive MCI (PMCI) and 48 patients with stable MCI (SMCI) were examined with HV, TBM for shape change, and VBM for gray matter density. We calculated the Correct Classification Rate (CCR), sensitivity (SS) and specificity (SP) between the study groups. RESULTS: We found unequivocal results differentiating controls from FTD with HV (hippocampus left side) (CCR = 0.83; SS = 0.84; SP = 0.80), with TBM (hippocampus and amygdala (CCR = 0.80/SS = 0.71/SP = 0.94), and with VBM (all the regions studied, especially in lateral ventricle frontal horn, central part and occipital horn) (CCR = 0.87/SS = 0.81/SP = 0.96). VBM achieved the highest accuracy in differentiating AD and FTD (CCR = 0.72/SS = 0.67/SP = 0.76), particularly in lateral ventricle (frontal horn, central part and occipital horn) (CCR = 0.73), whereas TBM in superior frontal gyrus also achieved a high accuracy (CCR = 0.71/SS = 0.68/SP = 0.73). TBM resulted in low accuracy (CCR = 0.62) in the differentiation of AD from FTD using all regions of interest, with similar results for HV (CCR = 0.55). CONCLUSION: Hippocampal atrophy is present not only in AD but also in FTD. Of the methods used, VBM achieved the highest accuracy in its ability to differentiate between FTD and AD. Public Library of Science 2012-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3527560/ /pubmed/23285078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052531 Text en © 2012 Muñoz Ruiz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel Ángel
Hartikainen, Päivi
Koikkalainen, Juha
Wolz, Robin
Julkunen, Valtteri
Niskanen, Eini
Herukka, Sanna-Kaisa
Kivipelto, Miia
Vanninen, Ritva
Rueckert, Daniel
Liu, Yawu
Lötjönen, Jyrki
Soininen, Hilkka
Structural MRI in Frontotemporal Dementia: Comparisons between Hippocampal Volumetry, Tensor-Based Morphometry and Voxel-Based Morphometry
title Structural MRI in Frontotemporal Dementia: Comparisons between Hippocampal Volumetry, Tensor-Based Morphometry and Voxel-Based Morphometry
title_full Structural MRI in Frontotemporal Dementia: Comparisons between Hippocampal Volumetry, Tensor-Based Morphometry and Voxel-Based Morphometry
title_fullStr Structural MRI in Frontotemporal Dementia: Comparisons between Hippocampal Volumetry, Tensor-Based Morphometry and Voxel-Based Morphometry
title_full_unstemmed Structural MRI in Frontotemporal Dementia: Comparisons between Hippocampal Volumetry, Tensor-Based Morphometry and Voxel-Based Morphometry
title_short Structural MRI in Frontotemporal Dementia: Comparisons between Hippocampal Volumetry, Tensor-Based Morphometry and Voxel-Based Morphometry
title_sort structural mri in frontotemporal dementia: comparisons between hippocampal volumetry, tensor-based morphometry and voxel-based morphometry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3527560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23285078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052531
work_keys_str_mv AT munozruizmiguelangel structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT hartikainenpaivi structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT koikkalainenjuha structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT wolzrobin structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT julkunenvaltteri structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT niskaneneini structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT herukkasannakaisa structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT kivipeltomiia structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT vanninenritva structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT rueckertdaniel structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT liuyawu structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT lotjonenjyrki structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry
AT soininenhilkka structuralmriinfrontotemporaldementiacomparisonsbetweenhippocampalvolumetrytensorbasedmorphometryandvoxelbasedmorphometry