Cargando…
How scaffolds shape MAPK signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches
Scaffolding proteins add a new layer of complexity to the dynamics of cell signaling. Above their basic function to bring several components of a signaling pathway together, recent experimental research has found that scaffolds influence signaling in a much more complex way: scaffolds can exert some...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3527831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23267331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00475 |
_version_ | 1782253774207713280 |
---|---|
author | Witzel, Franziska Maddison, Louise Blüthgen, Nils |
author_facet | Witzel, Franziska Maddison, Louise Blüthgen, Nils |
author_sort | Witzel, Franziska |
collection | PubMed |
description | Scaffolding proteins add a new layer of complexity to the dynamics of cell signaling. Above their basic function to bring several components of a signaling pathway together, recent experimental research has found that scaffolds influence signaling in a much more complex way: scaffolds can exert some catalytic function, influence signaling by allosteric mechanisms, are feedback-regulated, localize signaling activity to distinct regions of the cell or increase pathway fidelity. Here we review experimental and theoretical approaches that address the function of two MAPK scaffolds, Ste5, a scaffold of the yeast mating pathway and KSR1/2, a scaffold of the classical mammalian MAPK signaling pathway. For the yeast scaffold Ste5, detailed mechanistic models have been valuable for the understanding of its function. For scaffolds in mammalian signaling, however, models have been rather generic and sketchy. For example, these models predicted narrow optimal scaffold concentrations, but when revisiting these models by assuming typical concentrations, rather a range of scaffold levels optimally supports signaling. Thus, more realistic models are needed to understand the role of scaffolds in mammalian signal transduction, which opens a big opportunity for systems biology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3527831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35278312012-12-24 How scaffolds shape MAPK signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches Witzel, Franziska Maddison, Louise Blüthgen, Nils Front Physiol Physiology Scaffolding proteins add a new layer of complexity to the dynamics of cell signaling. Above their basic function to bring several components of a signaling pathway together, recent experimental research has found that scaffolds influence signaling in a much more complex way: scaffolds can exert some catalytic function, influence signaling by allosteric mechanisms, are feedback-regulated, localize signaling activity to distinct regions of the cell or increase pathway fidelity. Here we review experimental and theoretical approaches that address the function of two MAPK scaffolds, Ste5, a scaffold of the yeast mating pathway and KSR1/2, a scaffold of the classical mammalian MAPK signaling pathway. For the yeast scaffold Ste5, detailed mechanistic models have been valuable for the understanding of its function. For scaffolds in mammalian signaling, however, models have been rather generic and sketchy. For example, these models predicted narrow optimal scaffold concentrations, but when revisiting these models by assuming typical concentrations, rather a range of scaffold levels optimally supports signaling. Thus, more realistic models are needed to understand the role of scaffolds in mammalian signal transduction, which opens a big opportunity for systems biology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3527831/ /pubmed/23267331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00475 Text en Copyright © 2012 Witzel, Maddison and Blüthgen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Witzel, Franziska Maddison, Louise Blüthgen, Nils How scaffolds shape MAPK signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches |
title | How scaffolds shape MAPK signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches |
title_full | How scaffolds shape MAPK signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches |
title_fullStr | How scaffolds shape MAPK signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | How scaffolds shape MAPK signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches |
title_short | How scaffolds shape MAPK signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches |
title_sort | how scaffolds shape mapk signaling: what we know and opportunities for systems approaches |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3527831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23267331 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00475 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT witzelfranziska howscaffoldsshapemapksignalingwhatweknowandopportunitiesforsystemsapproaches AT maddisonlouise howscaffoldsshapemapksignalingwhatweknowandopportunitiesforsystemsapproaches AT bluthgennils howscaffoldsshapemapksignalingwhatweknowandopportunitiesforsystemsapproaches |