Cargando…

Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients

We compared steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) – Myfenax® (Teva) and CellCept® (Roche) – in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This was an international, multi-centre, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study with a 3-month follow-up. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sunder-Plassmann, Gere, Reinke, Petra, Rath, Thomas, Wiecek, Andrzej, Nowicki, Michal, Moore, Richard, Lutz, Jens, Gaggl, Martina, Ferkl, Marek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22500920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01475.x
_version_ 1782253790117756928
author Sunder-Plassmann, Gere
Reinke, Petra
Rath, Thomas
Wiecek, Andrzej
Nowicki, Michal
Moore, Richard
Lutz, Jens
Gaggl, Martina
Ferkl, Marek
author_facet Sunder-Plassmann, Gere
Reinke, Petra
Rath, Thomas
Wiecek, Andrzej
Nowicki, Michal
Moore, Richard
Lutz, Jens
Gaggl, Martina
Ferkl, Marek
author_sort Sunder-Plassmann, Gere
collection PubMed
description We compared steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) – Myfenax® (Teva) and CellCept® (Roche) – in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This was an international, multi-centre, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study with a 3-month follow-up. We included KTRs at least 12 months post-transplantation with stable renal graft function for at least 3 months. The maintenance treatment consisted of MMF in combination with tacrolimus with or without steroids. At the end of the two treatment periods, 6-h or 12-h PK studies of mycophenolic acid (MPA) were performed. A total of 43 patients (mean age: 50.7 ± 13.5 years; 19 females, 24 males) were randomized. Estimates of test to reference ratios (90% CIs) were 0.959 (0.899; 1.023) h*μg/ml for AUC((0–tau)) and 0.873 (0.787; 0.968) μg/ml for C(max). Estimates for AUC((0–6h)) were 0.923 (0.865; 0.984) h*μg/ml and 0.985 (0.877; 1.106) μg/ml for C(min). Thus, AUC((0–tau)), AUC((0–6h)), and C(min) of MPA were within the predefined margins. C(max) was somewhat outside of these margins in this set of patients. The numbers and types of adverse events were not different between the two treatments. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of MPA as well as adverse events are comparable for Myfenax® and CellCept® in tacrolimus-treated stable KTRs. (EudraCT-No.: 2009-010562-31; ClinicalTrials.Gov number: NCT00991510)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3528070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35280702013-01-03 Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Reinke, Petra Rath, Thomas Wiecek, Andrzej Nowicki, Michal Moore, Richard Lutz, Jens Gaggl, Martina Ferkl, Marek Transpl Int Clinical Research We compared steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) – Myfenax® (Teva) and CellCept® (Roche) – in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This was an international, multi-centre, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study with a 3-month follow-up. We included KTRs at least 12 months post-transplantation with stable renal graft function for at least 3 months. The maintenance treatment consisted of MMF in combination with tacrolimus with or without steroids. At the end of the two treatment periods, 6-h or 12-h PK studies of mycophenolic acid (MPA) were performed. A total of 43 patients (mean age: 50.7 ± 13.5 years; 19 females, 24 males) were randomized. Estimates of test to reference ratios (90% CIs) were 0.959 (0.899; 1.023) h*μg/ml for AUC((0–tau)) and 0.873 (0.787; 0.968) μg/ml for C(max). Estimates for AUC((0–6h)) were 0.923 (0.865; 0.984) h*μg/ml and 0.985 (0.877; 1.106) μg/ml for C(min). Thus, AUC((0–tau)), AUC((0–6h)), and C(min) of MPA were within the predefined margins. C(max) was somewhat outside of these margins in this set of patients. The numbers and types of adverse events were not different between the two treatments. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of MPA as well as adverse events are comparable for Myfenax® and CellCept® in tacrolimus-treated stable KTRs. (EudraCT-No.: 2009-010562-31; ClinicalTrials.Gov number: NCT00991510) Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-06 2012-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3528070/ /pubmed/22500920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01475.x Text en © 2012 The Authors. Transplant International © 2012 European Society for Organ Transplantation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Sunder-Plassmann, Gere
Reinke, Petra
Rath, Thomas
Wiecek, Andrzej
Nowicki, Michal
Moore, Richard
Lutz, Jens
Gaggl, Martina
Ferkl, Marek
Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients
title Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients
title_full Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients
title_fullStr Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients
title_short Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients
title_sort comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22500920
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01475.x
work_keys_str_mv AT sunderplassmanngere comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients
AT reinkepetra comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients
AT raththomas comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients
AT wiecekandrzej comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients
AT nowickimichal comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients
AT moorerichard comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients
AT lutzjens comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients
AT gagglmartina comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients
AT ferklmarek comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients