Cargando…
Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients
We compared steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) – Myfenax® (Teva) and CellCept® (Roche) – in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This was an international, multi-centre, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study with a 3-month follow-up. We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22500920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01475.x |
_version_ | 1782253790117756928 |
---|---|
author | Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Reinke, Petra Rath, Thomas Wiecek, Andrzej Nowicki, Michal Moore, Richard Lutz, Jens Gaggl, Martina Ferkl, Marek |
author_facet | Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Reinke, Petra Rath, Thomas Wiecek, Andrzej Nowicki, Michal Moore, Richard Lutz, Jens Gaggl, Martina Ferkl, Marek |
author_sort | Sunder-Plassmann, Gere |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) – Myfenax® (Teva) and CellCept® (Roche) – in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This was an international, multi-centre, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study with a 3-month follow-up. We included KTRs at least 12 months post-transplantation with stable renal graft function for at least 3 months. The maintenance treatment consisted of MMF in combination with tacrolimus with or without steroids. At the end of the two treatment periods, 6-h or 12-h PK studies of mycophenolic acid (MPA) were performed. A total of 43 patients (mean age: 50.7 ± 13.5 years; 19 females, 24 males) were randomized. Estimates of test to reference ratios (90% CIs) were 0.959 (0.899; 1.023) h*μg/ml for AUC((0–tau)) and 0.873 (0.787; 0.968) μg/ml for C(max). Estimates for AUC((0–6h)) were 0.923 (0.865; 0.984) h*μg/ml and 0.985 (0.877; 1.106) μg/ml for C(min). Thus, AUC((0–tau)), AUC((0–6h)), and C(min) of MPA were within the predefined margins. C(max) was somewhat outside of these margins in this set of patients. The numbers and types of adverse events were not different between the two treatments. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of MPA as well as adverse events are comparable for Myfenax® and CellCept® in tacrolimus-treated stable KTRs. (EudraCT-No.: 2009-010562-31; ClinicalTrials.Gov number: NCT00991510) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3528070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35280702013-01-03 Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Reinke, Petra Rath, Thomas Wiecek, Andrzej Nowicki, Michal Moore, Richard Lutz, Jens Gaggl, Martina Ferkl, Marek Transpl Int Clinical Research We compared steady-state pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) – Myfenax® (Teva) and CellCept® (Roche) – in stable kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This was an international, multi-centre, randomized, open-label, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study with a 3-month follow-up. We included KTRs at least 12 months post-transplantation with stable renal graft function for at least 3 months. The maintenance treatment consisted of MMF in combination with tacrolimus with or without steroids. At the end of the two treatment periods, 6-h or 12-h PK studies of mycophenolic acid (MPA) were performed. A total of 43 patients (mean age: 50.7 ± 13.5 years; 19 females, 24 males) were randomized. Estimates of test to reference ratios (90% CIs) were 0.959 (0.899; 1.023) h*μg/ml for AUC((0–tau)) and 0.873 (0.787; 0.968) μg/ml for C(max). Estimates for AUC((0–6h)) were 0.923 (0.865; 0.984) h*μg/ml and 0.985 (0.877; 1.106) μg/ml for C(min). Thus, AUC((0–tau)), AUC((0–6h)), and C(min) of MPA were within the predefined margins. C(max) was somewhat outside of these margins in this set of patients. The numbers and types of adverse events were not different between the two treatments. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of MPA as well as adverse events are comparable for Myfenax® and CellCept® in tacrolimus-treated stable KTRs. (EudraCT-No.: 2009-010562-31; ClinicalTrials.Gov number: NCT00991510) Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-06 2012-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3528070/ /pubmed/22500920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01475.x Text en © 2012 The Authors. Transplant International © 2012 European Society for Organ Transplantation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Sunder-Plassmann, Gere Reinke, Petra Rath, Thomas Wiecek, Andrzej Nowicki, Michal Moore, Richard Lutz, Jens Gaggl, Martina Ferkl, Marek Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients |
title | Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients |
title_full | Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients |
title_fullStr | Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients |
title_short | Comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients |
title_sort | comparative pharmacokinetic study of two mycophenolate mofetil formulations in stable kidney transplant recipients |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22500920 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01475.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunderplassmanngere comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients AT reinkepetra comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients AT raththomas comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients AT wiecekandrzej comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients AT nowickimichal comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients AT moorerichard comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients AT lutzjens comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients AT gagglmartina comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients AT ferklmarek comparativepharmacokineticstudyoftwomycophenolatemofetilformulationsinstablekidneytransplantrecipients |