Cargando…

Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction

Objective: Adjunct acellular dermal matrices (ADM) are thought to improve esthetic outcomes of breast reconstruction but the existing evidence is largely anecdotal. In this study, we provide comparative data on esthetic outcomes of expander-implant breast reconstruction with and without ADM. Methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Khang T., Mioton, Lauren M., Smetona, John T., Seth, Akhil K., Kim, John Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Open Science Company, LLC 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23308305
_version_ 1782253816906776576
author Nguyen, Khang T.
Mioton, Lauren M.
Smetona, John T.
Seth, Akhil K.
Kim, John Y.
author_facet Nguyen, Khang T.
Mioton, Lauren M.
Smetona, John T.
Seth, Akhil K.
Kim, John Y.
author_sort Nguyen, Khang T.
collection PubMed
description Objective: Adjunct acellular dermal matrices (ADM) are thought to improve esthetic outcomes of breast reconstruction but the existing evidence is largely anecdotal. In this study, we provide comparative data on esthetic outcomes of expander-implant breast reconstruction with and without ADM. Methods: Chart review was performed on a consecutive series of expander-implant reconstructions by the senior author. Demographic, oncologic, surgical, and photographic data were obtained for each patient. Photographic data were scored using a 3-point (0-1-2) breast-specific esthetic scale by 3 blinded, independent reviewers not involved in patient care. Results: ADM-assisted breast reconstructions had significantly higher scores than the non-ADM reconstructions for breast mound volume (1.38 vs 1.11; P = .0102), breast mound placement (1.57 vs 1.39; P = .0217), and the inframammary fold (1.39 vs 1.23; P = .0458). Conclusions: ADM may improve breast volume, placement, and inframammary fold definition. These specific findings may help plastic surgeons better utilize ADM to improve outcomes for breast reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3528352
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Open Science Company, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35283522013-01-10 Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction Nguyen, Khang T. Mioton, Lauren M. Smetona, John T. Seth, Akhil K. Kim, John Y. Eplasty Journal Article Objective: Adjunct acellular dermal matrices (ADM) are thought to improve esthetic outcomes of breast reconstruction but the existing evidence is largely anecdotal. In this study, we provide comparative data on esthetic outcomes of expander-implant breast reconstruction with and without ADM. Methods: Chart review was performed on a consecutive series of expander-implant reconstructions by the senior author. Demographic, oncologic, surgical, and photographic data were obtained for each patient. Photographic data were scored using a 3-point (0-1-2) breast-specific esthetic scale by 3 blinded, independent reviewers not involved in patient care. Results: ADM-assisted breast reconstructions had significantly higher scores than the non-ADM reconstructions for breast mound volume (1.38 vs 1.11; P = .0102), breast mound placement (1.57 vs 1.39; P = .0217), and the inframammary fold (1.39 vs 1.23; P = .0458). Conclusions: ADM may improve breast volume, placement, and inframammary fold definition. These specific findings may help plastic surgeons better utilize ADM to improve outcomes for breast reconstruction. Open Science Company, LLC 2012-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3528352/ /pubmed/23308305 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Journal Article
Nguyen, Khang T.
Mioton, Lauren M.
Smetona, John T.
Seth, Akhil K.
Kim, John Y.
Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction
title Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction
title_full Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction
title_short Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction
title_sort esthetic outcomes of adm-assisted expander-implant breast reconstruction
topic Journal Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528352/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23308305
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenkhangt estheticoutcomesofadmassistedexpanderimplantbreastreconstruction
AT miotonlaurenm estheticoutcomesofadmassistedexpanderimplantbreastreconstruction
AT smetonajohnt estheticoutcomesofadmassistedexpanderimplantbreastreconstruction
AT sethakhilk estheticoutcomesofadmassistedexpanderimplantbreastreconstruction
AT kimjohny estheticoutcomesofadmassistedexpanderimplantbreastreconstruction