Cargando…
Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event
BACKGROUND: Adverse consequences of medical interventions are a source of concern, but clinical trials may lack power to detect elevated rates of such events, while observational studies have inherent limitations. Meta-analysis allows the combination of individual studies, which can increase power a...
Autores principales: | C Warren, Fiona, R Abrams, Keith, Golder, Su, J Sutton, Alex |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528446/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22553987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-64 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data Derived from Randomised
Controlled Trials as Compared to Observational Studies: Methodological
Overview
por: Golder, Su, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Researchers Using Social Media for Detecting and Monitoring Adverse Events Data: Multi Methods Study
por: Golder, Su, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review
por: Zorzela, Liliane, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Methods to Compare Adverse Events in Twitter to FAERS, Drug Information Databases, and Systematic Reviews: Proof of Concept with Adalimumab
por: Smith, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review
por: Golder, Su, et al.
Publicado: (2016)