Cargando…

Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination

PURPOSE: Analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is becoming of recognized importance in reproductive medicine, but assays are not standardized. We have evaluated the correlation between the new Gen II ELISA kit (Beckman-Coutler) and the older ELISA kits by Immunotech (IOT) and Diagnostic Systems L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hang Wun Raymond, Ng, Ernest Hung Yu, Wong, Benancy Po Chau, Anderson, Richard A., Ho, Pak Chung, Yeung, William Shu Biu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23117477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9880-1
_version_ 1782253872191897600
author Li, Hang Wun Raymond
Ng, Ernest Hung Yu
Wong, Benancy Po Chau
Anderson, Richard A.
Ho, Pak Chung
Yeung, William Shu Biu
author_facet Li, Hang Wun Raymond
Ng, Ernest Hung Yu
Wong, Benancy Po Chau
Anderson, Richard A.
Ho, Pak Chung
Yeung, William Shu Biu
author_sort Li, Hang Wun Raymond
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is becoming of recognized importance in reproductive medicine, but assays are not standardized. We have evaluated the correlation between the new Gen II ELISA kit (Beckman-Coutler) and the older ELISA kits by Immunotech (IOT) and Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (DSL). METHODS: A total of 56 archived serum samples from patients with subfertility or reproductive endocrine disorders were retrieved and assayed in duplicate using the three AMH ELISA kits . The samples covered a wide range of AMH concentrations (1.9 to 142.5 pmol/L). RESULTS: We observed good correlations between the new (AMH Gen II) and old AMH assay kits by IOT and DSL (R(2) = 0.971 and 0.930 respectively). The regression equations were AMH (Gen II) = 1.353 × AMH (IOT) + 0.051 and AMH (Gen II) = 1.223 × AMH (DSL) – 1.270 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AMH concentrations using the Gen II kit are slightly higher than those from the IOT and DSL kits. Standardization of assay results worldwide is urgently required but this analysis facilitates the interpretation of values obtained historically and in future studies using any of the 3 assays available. Meanwhile, adapting clinical cut-offs from previously published work by direct conversion is not recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3528883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35288832013-01-04 Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination Li, Hang Wun Raymond Ng, Ernest Hung Yu Wong, Benancy Po Chau Anderson, Richard A. Ho, Pak Chung Yeung, William Shu Biu J Assist Reprod Genet Technological Innovations PURPOSE: Analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is becoming of recognized importance in reproductive medicine, but assays are not standardized. We have evaluated the correlation between the new Gen II ELISA kit (Beckman-Coutler) and the older ELISA kits by Immunotech (IOT) and Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (DSL). METHODS: A total of 56 archived serum samples from patients with subfertility or reproductive endocrine disorders were retrieved and assayed in duplicate using the three AMH ELISA kits . The samples covered a wide range of AMH concentrations (1.9 to 142.5 pmol/L). RESULTS: We observed good correlations between the new (AMH Gen II) and old AMH assay kits by IOT and DSL (R(2) = 0.971 and 0.930 respectively). The regression equations were AMH (Gen II) = 1.353 × AMH (IOT) + 0.051 and AMH (Gen II) = 1.223 × AMH (DSL) – 1.270 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AMH concentrations using the Gen II kit are slightly higher than those from the IOT and DSL kits. Standardization of assay results worldwide is urgently required but this analysis facilitates the interpretation of values obtained historically and in future studies using any of the 3 assays available. Meanwhile, adapting clinical cut-offs from previously published work by direct conversion is not recommended. Springer US 2012-11-02 2012-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3528883/ /pubmed/23117477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9880-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Technological Innovations
Li, Hang Wun Raymond
Ng, Ernest Hung Yu
Wong, Benancy Po Chau
Anderson, Richard A.
Ho, Pak Chung
Yeung, William Shu Biu
Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination
title Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination
title_full Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination
title_fullStr Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination
title_short Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) determination
title_sort correlation between three assay systems for anti-müllerian hormone (amh) determination
topic Technological Innovations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23117477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9880-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lihangwunraymond correlationbetweenthreeassaysystemsforantimullerianhormoneamhdetermination
AT ngernesthungyu correlationbetweenthreeassaysystemsforantimullerianhormoneamhdetermination
AT wongbenancypochau correlationbetweenthreeassaysystemsforantimullerianhormoneamhdetermination
AT andersonricharda correlationbetweenthreeassaysystemsforantimullerianhormoneamhdetermination
AT hopakchung correlationbetweenthreeassaysystemsforantimullerianhormoneamhdetermination
AT yeungwilliamshubiu correlationbetweenthreeassaysystemsforantimullerianhormoneamhdetermination