Cargando…
Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system
BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to prospectively report the clinical results of 280 consecutive hips (240 patients) who received a ReCap Hip Resurfacing System implant (Biomet Inc., Warsaw, USA) in a single district general hospital. Literature reports a large variation in clinical results...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-247 |
_version_ | 1782253876930412544 |
---|---|
author | van der Weegen, Walter Hoekstra, Henk J Sijbesma, Thea Austen, Shennah Poolman, Rudolf W |
author_facet | van der Weegen, Walter Hoekstra, Henk J Sijbesma, Thea Austen, Shennah Poolman, Rudolf W |
author_sort | van der Weegen, Walter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to prospectively report the clinical results of 280 consecutive hips (240 patients) who received a ReCap Hip Resurfacing System implant (Biomet Inc., Warsaw, USA) in a single district general hospital. Literature reports a large variation in clinical results between different resurfacing designs and published results using this particular design are scarce. METHODS: Mean follow up was 3.3 years (1.0 to 6.3) and four patients were lost to follow-up. All patients were diagnosed with end-stage hip osteoarthritis, their mean age was 54 years and 76.4% of all patients were male. RESULTS: There were 16 revisions and four patients reported a Harris Hip Score <70 points at their latest follow up. There were no pending revisions. Kaplan-Meier implant survival probability, with revision for any reason as endpoint, was 93.5% at six years follow-up (95%-CI: 88.8-95.3). There were no revisions for Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris (ARMD) and no indications of ARMD in symptomatic non-revised patients, although diagnostics were limited to ultrasound scans. CONCLUSIONS: This independent series confirms that hip resurfacing is a demanding procedure, and that implant survival of the ReCap hip resurfacing system is on a critical level in our series. In non-revised patients, reported outcomes are generally excellent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00603395 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3529103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35291032013-01-03 Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system van der Weegen, Walter Hoekstra, Henk J Sijbesma, Thea Austen, Shennah Poolman, Rudolf W BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to prospectively report the clinical results of 280 consecutive hips (240 patients) who received a ReCap Hip Resurfacing System implant (Biomet Inc., Warsaw, USA) in a single district general hospital. Literature reports a large variation in clinical results between different resurfacing designs and published results using this particular design are scarce. METHODS: Mean follow up was 3.3 years (1.0 to 6.3) and four patients were lost to follow-up. All patients were diagnosed with end-stage hip osteoarthritis, their mean age was 54 years and 76.4% of all patients were male. RESULTS: There were 16 revisions and four patients reported a Harris Hip Score <70 points at their latest follow up. There were no pending revisions. Kaplan-Meier implant survival probability, with revision for any reason as endpoint, was 93.5% at six years follow-up (95%-CI: 88.8-95.3). There were no revisions for Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris (ARMD) and no indications of ARMD in symptomatic non-revised patients, although diagnostics were limited to ultrasound scans. CONCLUSIONS: This independent series confirms that hip resurfacing is a demanding procedure, and that implant survival of the ReCap hip resurfacing system is on a critical level in our series. In non-revised patients, reported outcomes are generally excellent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00603395 BioMed Central 2012-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3529103/ /pubmed/23234268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-247 Text en Copyright ©2012 van der Weegen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Weegen, Walter Hoekstra, Henk J Sijbesma, Thea Austen, Shennah Poolman, Rudolf W Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system |
title | Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system |
title_full | Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system |
title_fullStr | Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system |
title_full_unstemmed | Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system |
title_short | Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system |
title_sort | hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the recap hip resurfacing system |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderweegenwalter hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem AT hoekstrahenkj hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem AT sijbesmathea hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem AT austenshennah hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem AT poolmanrudolfw hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem |