Cargando…

Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to prospectively report the clinical results of 280 consecutive hips (240 patients) who received a ReCap Hip Resurfacing System implant (Biomet Inc., Warsaw, USA) in a single district general hospital. Literature reports a large variation in clinical results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Weegen, Walter, Hoekstra, Henk J, Sijbesma, Thea, Austen, Shennah, Poolman, Rudolf W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-247
_version_ 1782253876930412544
author van der Weegen, Walter
Hoekstra, Henk J
Sijbesma, Thea
Austen, Shennah
Poolman, Rudolf W
author_facet van der Weegen, Walter
Hoekstra, Henk J
Sijbesma, Thea
Austen, Shennah
Poolman, Rudolf W
author_sort van der Weegen, Walter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to prospectively report the clinical results of 280 consecutive hips (240 patients) who received a ReCap Hip Resurfacing System implant (Biomet Inc., Warsaw, USA) in a single district general hospital. Literature reports a large variation in clinical results between different resurfacing designs and published results using this particular design are scarce. METHODS: Mean follow up was 3.3 years (1.0 to 6.3) and four patients were lost to follow-up. All patients were diagnosed with end-stage hip osteoarthritis, their mean age was 54 years and 76.4% of all patients were male. RESULTS: There were 16 revisions and four patients reported a Harris Hip Score <70 points at their latest follow up. There were no pending revisions. Kaplan-Meier implant survival probability, with revision for any reason as endpoint, was 93.5% at six years follow-up (95%-CI: 88.8-95.3). There were no revisions for Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris (ARMD) and no indications of ARMD in symptomatic non-revised patients, although diagnostics were limited to ultrasound scans. CONCLUSIONS: This independent series confirms that hip resurfacing is a demanding procedure, and that implant survival of the ReCap hip resurfacing system is on a critical level in our series. In non-revised patients, reported outcomes are generally excellent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00603395
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3529103
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35291032013-01-03 Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system van der Weegen, Walter Hoekstra, Henk J Sijbesma, Thea Austen, Shennah Poolman, Rudolf W BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to prospectively report the clinical results of 280 consecutive hips (240 patients) who received a ReCap Hip Resurfacing System implant (Biomet Inc., Warsaw, USA) in a single district general hospital. Literature reports a large variation in clinical results between different resurfacing designs and published results using this particular design are scarce. METHODS: Mean follow up was 3.3 years (1.0 to 6.3) and four patients were lost to follow-up. All patients were diagnosed with end-stage hip osteoarthritis, their mean age was 54 years and 76.4% of all patients were male. RESULTS: There were 16 revisions and four patients reported a Harris Hip Score <70 points at their latest follow up. There were no pending revisions. Kaplan-Meier implant survival probability, with revision for any reason as endpoint, was 93.5% at six years follow-up (95%-CI: 88.8-95.3). There were no revisions for Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris (ARMD) and no indications of ARMD in symptomatic non-revised patients, although diagnostics were limited to ultrasound scans. CONCLUSIONS: This independent series confirms that hip resurfacing is a demanding procedure, and that implant survival of the ReCap hip resurfacing system is on a critical level in our series. In non-revised patients, reported outcomes are generally excellent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00603395 BioMed Central 2012-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3529103/ /pubmed/23234268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-247 Text en Copyright ©2012 van der Weegen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Weegen, Walter
Hoekstra, Henk J
Sijbesma, Thea
Austen, Shennah
Poolman, Rudolf W
Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system
title Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system
title_full Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system
title_fullStr Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system
title_full_unstemmed Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system
title_short Hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the ReCap hip resurfacing system
title_sort hip resurfacing in a district general hospital: 6-year clinical results using the recap hip resurfacing system
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529103/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23234268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-247
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderweegenwalter hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem
AT hoekstrahenkj hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem
AT sijbesmathea hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem
AT austenshennah hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem
AT poolmanrudolfw hipresurfacinginadistrictgeneralhospital6yearclinicalresultsusingtherecaphipresurfacingsystem