Cargando…

Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research

BACKGROUND: There are no empirically-grounded criteria or tools to define or benchmark the quality of outpatient clinical documentation. Outpatient clinical notes document care, communicate treatment plans and support patient safety, medical education, medico-legal investigations and reimbursement....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanson, Janice L, Stephens, Mark B, Pangaro, Louis N, Gimbel, Ronald W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23164470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-407
_version_ 1782253880333041664
author Hanson, Janice L
Stephens, Mark B
Pangaro, Louis N
Gimbel, Ronald W
author_facet Hanson, Janice L
Stephens, Mark B
Pangaro, Louis N
Gimbel, Ronald W
author_sort Hanson, Janice L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are no empirically-grounded criteria or tools to define or benchmark the quality of outpatient clinical documentation. Outpatient clinical notes document care, communicate treatment plans and support patient safety, medical education, medico-legal investigations and reimbursement. Accurately describing and assessing quality of clinical documentation is a necessary improvement in an increasingly team-based healthcare delivery system. In this paper we describe the quality of outpatient clinical notes from the perspective of multiple stakeholders. METHODS: Using purposeful sampling for maximum diversity, we conducted focus groups and individual interviews with clinicians, nursing and ancillary staff, patients, and healthcare administrators at six federal health care facilities between 2009 and 2011. All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using open, axial and selective coding. RESULTS: The 163 participants included 61 clinicians, 52 nurse/ancillary staff, 31 patients and 19 administrative staff. Three organizing themes emerged: 1) characteristics of quality in clinical notes, 2) desired elements within the clinical notes and 3) system supports to improve the quality of clinical notes. We identified 11 codes to describe characteristics of clinical notes, 20 codes to describe desired elements in quality clinical notes and 11 codes to describe clinical system elements that support quality when writing clinical notes. While there was substantial overlap between the aspects of quality described by the four stakeholder groups, only clinicians and administrators identified ease of translation into billing codes as an important characteristic of a quality note. Only patients rated prioritization of their medical problems as an aspect of quality. Nurses included care and education delivered to the patient, information added by the patient, interdisciplinary information, and infection alerts as important content. CONCLUSIONS: Perspectives of these four stakeholder groups provide a comprehensive description of quality in outpatient clinical documentation. The resulting description of characteristics and content necessary for quality notes provides a research-based foundation for assessing the quality of clinical documentation in outpatient health care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3529118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35291182013-01-03 Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research Hanson, Janice L Stephens, Mark B Pangaro, Louis N Gimbel, Ronald W BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: There are no empirically-grounded criteria or tools to define or benchmark the quality of outpatient clinical documentation. Outpatient clinical notes document care, communicate treatment plans and support patient safety, medical education, medico-legal investigations and reimbursement. Accurately describing and assessing quality of clinical documentation is a necessary improvement in an increasingly team-based healthcare delivery system. In this paper we describe the quality of outpatient clinical notes from the perspective of multiple stakeholders. METHODS: Using purposeful sampling for maximum diversity, we conducted focus groups and individual interviews with clinicians, nursing and ancillary staff, patients, and healthcare administrators at six federal health care facilities between 2009 and 2011. All sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using open, axial and selective coding. RESULTS: The 163 participants included 61 clinicians, 52 nurse/ancillary staff, 31 patients and 19 administrative staff. Three organizing themes emerged: 1) characteristics of quality in clinical notes, 2) desired elements within the clinical notes and 3) system supports to improve the quality of clinical notes. We identified 11 codes to describe characteristics of clinical notes, 20 codes to describe desired elements in quality clinical notes and 11 codes to describe clinical system elements that support quality when writing clinical notes. While there was substantial overlap between the aspects of quality described by the four stakeholder groups, only clinicians and administrators identified ease of translation into billing codes as an important characteristic of a quality note. Only patients rated prioritization of their medical problems as an aspect of quality. Nurses included care and education delivered to the patient, information added by the patient, interdisciplinary information, and infection alerts as important content. CONCLUSIONS: Perspectives of these four stakeholder groups provide a comprehensive description of quality in outpatient clinical documentation. The resulting description of characteristics and content necessary for quality notes provides a research-based foundation for assessing the quality of clinical documentation in outpatient health care settings. BioMed Central 2012-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3529118/ /pubmed/23164470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-407 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hanson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hanson, Janice L
Stephens, Mark B
Pangaro, Louis N
Gimbel, Ronald W
Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research
title Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research
title_full Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research
title_fullStr Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research
title_full_unstemmed Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research
title_short Quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research
title_sort quality of outpatient clinical notes: a stakeholder definition derived through qualitative research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23164470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-407
work_keys_str_mv AT hansonjanicel qualityofoutpatientclinicalnotesastakeholderdefinitionderivedthroughqualitativeresearch
AT stephensmarkb qualityofoutpatientclinicalnotesastakeholderdefinitionderivedthroughqualitativeresearch
AT pangarolouisn qualityofoutpatientclinicalnotesastakeholderdefinitionderivedthroughqualitativeresearch
AT gimbelronaldw qualityofoutpatientclinicalnotesastakeholderdefinitionderivedthroughqualitativeresearch