Cargando…

The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the progression of bone mass loss in chronic hemodialysis patients (CHPs) with that in general population patients (GPPs) over an 18-month period. METHODS: The control group consisted of 60 patients (aged 57.5 ± 10.9 years) with a glomerular filt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avramovski, Petar, Sikole, Aleksandar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23269885
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2012.27.4.436
_version_ 1782253890494791680
author Avramovski, Petar
Sikole, Aleksandar
author_facet Avramovski, Petar
Sikole, Aleksandar
author_sort Avramovski, Petar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the progression of bone mass loss in chronic hemodialysis patients (CHPs) with that in general population patients (GPPs) over an 18-month period. METHODS: The control group consisted of 60 patients (aged 57.5 ± 10.9 years) with a glomerular filtration rate > 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The study group included 80 patients undergoing hemodialysis (aged 59.3 ± 11.8 years; duration of dialysis 5.47 ± 5.16 years). Bone mineral density (BMD) testing was conducted in both groups using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at hip and lumbar spine regions at baseline and after 18 months. Biochemical parameters (albumin, C-reactive protein, calcium, ionized calcium, alkaline phosphatase, and parathyroid hormone) were determined in all participants using standard laboratory procedures. RESULTS: The mean values of BMD (average hip + lumbar spine) were 0.900 ± 0.14 g/cm(2) and 0.866 ± 0.14 g/cm(2) in the GPP and 0.823 ± 0.16 g/cm(2) and 0.769 ± 0.13 g/cm(2) in the CHP groups at baseline and 18 months, respectively. The statistical significance (p value) of hip bone loss progression over 18 months was 0.0577 for GPP and 0.0002 for CHP, whereas that of lumbar spine bone loss progression was 0.6820 for GPP and 0.5389 for CHP. CONCLUSIONS: The of progression bone mass loss was significantly greater in CHP than in GPP. Bone mass loss was evident even over 1 month, albeit in only the CHP with accelerated osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3529243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35292432012-12-26 The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population Avramovski, Petar Sikole, Aleksandar Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the progression of bone mass loss in chronic hemodialysis patients (CHPs) with that in general population patients (GPPs) over an 18-month period. METHODS: The control group consisted of 60 patients (aged 57.5 ± 10.9 years) with a glomerular filtration rate > 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The study group included 80 patients undergoing hemodialysis (aged 59.3 ± 11.8 years; duration of dialysis 5.47 ± 5.16 years). Bone mineral density (BMD) testing was conducted in both groups using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at hip and lumbar spine regions at baseline and after 18 months. Biochemical parameters (albumin, C-reactive protein, calcium, ionized calcium, alkaline phosphatase, and parathyroid hormone) were determined in all participants using standard laboratory procedures. RESULTS: The mean values of BMD (average hip + lumbar spine) were 0.900 ± 0.14 g/cm(2) and 0.866 ± 0.14 g/cm(2) in the GPP and 0.823 ± 0.16 g/cm(2) and 0.769 ± 0.13 g/cm(2) in the CHP groups at baseline and 18 months, respectively. The statistical significance (p value) of hip bone loss progression over 18 months was 0.0577 for GPP and 0.0002 for CHP, whereas that of lumbar spine bone loss progression was 0.6820 for GPP and 0.5389 for CHP. CONCLUSIONS: The of progression bone mass loss was significantly greater in CHP than in GPP. Bone mass loss was evident even over 1 month, albeit in only the CHP with accelerated osteoporosis. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2012-12 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3529243/ /pubmed/23269885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2012.27.4.436 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Avramovski, Petar
Sikole, Aleksandar
The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population
title The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population
title_full The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population
title_fullStr The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population
title_full_unstemmed The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population
title_short The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population
title_sort progression of bone mineral density loss in dialysis patients compared with the general population
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23269885
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2012.27.4.436
work_keys_str_mv AT avramovskipetar theprogressionofbonemineraldensitylossindialysispatientscomparedwiththegeneralpopulation
AT sikolealeksandar theprogressionofbonemineraldensitylossindialysispatientscomparedwiththegeneralpopulation
AT avramovskipetar progressionofbonemineraldensitylossindialysispatientscomparedwiththegeneralpopulation
AT sikolealeksandar progressionofbonemineraldensitylossindialysispatientscomparedwiththegeneralpopulation