Cargando…
The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the progression of bone mass loss in chronic hemodialysis patients (CHPs) with that in general population patients (GPPs) over an 18-month period. METHODS: The control group consisted of 60 patients (aged 57.5 ± 10.9 years) with a glomerular filt...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23269885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2012.27.4.436 |
_version_ | 1782253890494791680 |
---|---|
author | Avramovski, Petar Sikole, Aleksandar |
author_facet | Avramovski, Petar Sikole, Aleksandar |
author_sort | Avramovski, Petar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the progression of bone mass loss in chronic hemodialysis patients (CHPs) with that in general population patients (GPPs) over an 18-month period. METHODS: The control group consisted of 60 patients (aged 57.5 ± 10.9 years) with a glomerular filtration rate > 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The study group included 80 patients undergoing hemodialysis (aged 59.3 ± 11.8 years; duration of dialysis 5.47 ± 5.16 years). Bone mineral density (BMD) testing was conducted in both groups using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at hip and lumbar spine regions at baseline and after 18 months. Biochemical parameters (albumin, C-reactive protein, calcium, ionized calcium, alkaline phosphatase, and parathyroid hormone) were determined in all participants using standard laboratory procedures. RESULTS: The mean values of BMD (average hip + lumbar spine) were 0.900 ± 0.14 g/cm(2) and 0.866 ± 0.14 g/cm(2) in the GPP and 0.823 ± 0.16 g/cm(2) and 0.769 ± 0.13 g/cm(2) in the CHP groups at baseline and 18 months, respectively. The statistical significance (p value) of hip bone loss progression over 18 months was 0.0577 for GPP and 0.0002 for CHP, whereas that of lumbar spine bone loss progression was 0.6820 for GPP and 0.5389 for CHP. CONCLUSIONS: The of progression bone mass loss was significantly greater in CHP than in GPP. Bone mass loss was evident even over 1 month, albeit in only the CHP with accelerated osteoporosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3529243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Korean Association of Internal Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35292432012-12-26 The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population Avramovski, Petar Sikole, Aleksandar Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the progression of bone mass loss in chronic hemodialysis patients (CHPs) with that in general population patients (GPPs) over an 18-month period. METHODS: The control group consisted of 60 patients (aged 57.5 ± 10.9 years) with a glomerular filtration rate > 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The study group included 80 patients undergoing hemodialysis (aged 59.3 ± 11.8 years; duration of dialysis 5.47 ± 5.16 years). Bone mineral density (BMD) testing was conducted in both groups using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at hip and lumbar spine regions at baseline and after 18 months. Biochemical parameters (albumin, C-reactive protein, calcium, ionized calcium, alkaline phosphatase, and parathyroid hormone) were determined in all participants using standard laboratory procedures. RESULTS: The mean values of BMD (average hip + lumbar spine) were 0.900 ± 0.14 g/cm(2) and 0.866 ± 0.14 g/cm(2) in the GPP and 0.823 ± 0.16 g/cm(2) and 0.769 ± 0.13 g/cm(2) in the CHP groups at baseline and 18 months, respectively. The statistical significance (p value) of hip bone loss progression over 18 months was 0.0577 for GPP and 0.0002 for CHP, whereas that of lumbar spine bone loss progression was 0.6820 for GPP and 0.5389 for CHP. CONCLUSIONS: The of progression bone mass loss was significantly greater in CHP than in GPP. Bone mass loss was evident even over 1 month, albeit in only the CHP with accelerated osteoporosis. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2012-12 2012-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3529243/ /pubmed/23269885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2012.27.4.436 Text en Copyright © 2012 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Avramovski, Petar Sikole, Aleksandar The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population |
title | The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population |
title_full | The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population |
title_fullStr | The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population |
title_full_unstemmed | The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population |
title_short | The Progression of Bone Mineral Density Loss in Dialysis Patients Compared with the General Population |
title_sort | progression of bone mineral density loss in dialysis patients compared with the general population |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23269885 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2012.27.4.436 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT avramovskipetar theprogressionofbonemineraldensitylossindialysispatientscomparedwiththegeneralpopulation AT sikolealeksandar theprogressionofbonemineraldensitylossindialysispatientscomparedwiththegeneralpopulation AT avramovskipetar progressionofbonemineraldensitylossindialysispatientscomparedwiththegeneralpopulation AT sikolealeksandar progressionofbonemineraldensitylossindialysispatientscomparedwiththegeneralpopulation |