Cargando…

Erratum: The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 Bruno O [corrected to Orlando B]

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529538/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601206010189
_version_ 1782253932358139904
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin composites (Gradia Direct, Venus, Venus Diamond, Enamel Plus HFO, Tetric Evoceram, Filtek Supreme XT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each composite, 12 square specimens were prepared: 9 specimens were polished, three for each different method, while three specimens were used as controls. Surface roughness was determined with AFM by measuring Root Mean Square (RMS) of average height. RESULTS: PoGo polisher determined a significantly rougher surface, versus controls, in 5 out of 6 composites evaluated. Some significant differences from unpolished controls were observed also for Enhance polishing. Polishing with Venus Supra did not result in any significant difference in surface roughness versus controls. No differences were observed between different polishing systems. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that Venus Supra polishing system could determine a smoother composite surface if compared to the other polishing systems tested. On this basis, we are conducting an in vivo study to evaluate bacterial colonization on some combinations of composites and polishing protocols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3529538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35295382013-01-02 Erratum: The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 Bruno O [corrected to Orlando B] Open Dent J Erratum BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polishing may increase the surface roughness of composites, with a possible effect on bacterial growth and material properties. This preliminary in vitro study evaluates the effect of three different polishing systems (PoGo polishers, Enhance, Venus Supra) on six direct resin composites (Gradia Direct, Venus, Venus Diamond, Enamel Plus HFO, Tetric Evoceram, Filtek Supreme XT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: For each composite, 12 square specimens were prepared: 9 specimens were polished, three for each different method, while three specimens were used as controls. Surface roughness was determined with AFM by measuring Root Mean Square (RMS) of average height. RESULTS: PoGo polisher determined a significantly rougher surface, versus controls, in 5 out of 6 composites evaluated. Some significant differences from unpolished controls were observed also for Enhance polishing. Polishing with Venus Supra did not result in any significant difference in surface roughness versus controls. No differences were observed between different polishing systems. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that Venus Supra polishing system could determine a smoother composite surface if compared to the other polishing systems tested. On this basis, we are conducting an in vivo study to evaluate bacterial colonization on some combinations of composites and polishing protocols. Bentham Open 2012-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3529538/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601206010189 Text en
spellingShingle Erratum
Erratum: The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 Bruno O [corrected to Orlando B]
title Erratum: The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 Bruno O [corrected to Orlando B]
title_full Erratum: The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 Bruno O [corrected to Orlando B]
title_fullStr Erratum: The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 Bruno O [corrected to Orlando B]
title_full_unstemmed Erratum: The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 Bruno O [corrected to Orlando B]
title_short Erratum: The Open Dentistry Journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 Bruno O [corrected to Orlando B]
title_sort erratum: the open dentistry journal, 2010, volume (4): page. 191-194, 191-194 bruno o [corrected to orlando b]
topic Erratum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529538/
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601206010189