Cargando…

The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength

This study investigated whether the use of superimposed whole-body vibration (WBV) during cross-education strength training would optimise strength transfer compared to conventional cross-education strength training. Twenty-one healthy, dominant right leg volunteers (21 ± 3 years) were allocated to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goodwill, Alicia M., Kidgell, Dawson J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/504837
_version_ 1782253953780547584
author Goodwill, Alicia M.
Kidgell, Dawson J.
author_facet Goodwill, Alicia M.
Kidgell, Dawson J.
author_sort Goodwill, Alicia M.
collection PubMed
description This study investigated whether the use of superimposed whole-body vibration (WBV) during cross-education strength training would optimise strength transfer compared to conventional cross-education strength training. Twenty-one healthy, dominant right leg volunteers (21 ± 3 years) were allocated to a strength training (ST, m = 3, f = 4), a strength training with WBV (ST + V, m = 3, f = 4), or a control group (no training, m = 3, f = 4). Training groups performed 9 sessions over 3 weeks, involving unilateral squats for the right leg, with or without WBV (35 Hz; 2.5 mm amplitude). All groups underwent dynamic single leg maximum strength testing (1RM) and single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) prior to and following training. Strength increased in the trained limb for the ST (41%; ES = 1.14) and ST + V (55%; ES = 1.03) groups, which resulted in a 35% (ES = 0.99) strength transfer to the untrained left leg for the ST group and a 52% (ES = 0.97) strength transfer to the untrained leg for the ST + V group, when compared to the control group. No differences in strength transfer between training groups were observed (P = 0.15). For the untrained leg, no differences in the peak height of recruitment curves or SICI were observed between ST and ST + V groups (P = 1.00). Strength training with WBV does not appear to modulate the cross-transfer of strength to a greater magnitude when compared to conventional cross-education strength training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3529861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35298612013-01-30 The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength Goodwill, Alicia M. Kidgell, Dawson J. ScientificWorldJournal Research Article This study investigated whether the use of superimposed whole-body vibration (WBV) during cross-education strength training would optimise strength transfer compared to conventional cross-education strength training. Twenty-one healthy, dominant right leg volunteers (21 ± 3 years) were allocated to a strength training (ST, m = 3, f = 4), a strength training with WBV (ST + V, m = 3, f = 4), or a control group (no training, m = 3, f = 4). Training groups performed 9 sessions over 3 weeks, involving unilateral squats for the right leg, with or without WBV (35 Hz; 2.5 mm amplitude). All groups underwent dynamic single leg maximum strength testing (1RM) and single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) prior to and following training. Strength increased in the trained limb for the ST (41%; ES = 1.14) and ST + V (55%; ES = 1.03) groups, which resulted in a 35% (ES = 0.99) strength transfer to the untrained left leg for the ST group and a 52% (ES = 0.97) strength transfer to the untrained leg for the ST + V group, when compared to the control group. No differences in strength transfer between training groups were observed (P = 0.15). For the untrained leg, no differences in the peak height of recruitment curves or SICI were observed between ST and ST + V groups (P = 1.00). Strength training with WBV does not appear to modulate the cross-transfer of strength to a greater magnitude when compared to conventional cross-education strength training. The Scientific World Journal 2012-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3529861/ /pubmed/23365521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/504837 Text en Copyright © 2012 A. M. Goodwill and D. J. Kidgell. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Goodwill, Alicia M.
Kidgell, Dawson J.
The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength
title The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength
title_full The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength
title_fullStr The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength
title_short The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength
title_sort effects of whole-body vibration on the cross-transfer of strength
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3529861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/504837
work_keys_str_mv AT goodwillaliciam theeffectsofwholebodyvibrationonthecrosstransferofstrength
AT kidgelldawsonj theeffectsofwholebodyvibrationonthecrosstransferofstrength
AT goodwillaliciam effectsofwholebodyvibrationonthecrosstransferofstrength
AT kidgelldawsonj effectsofwholebodyvibrationonthecrosstransferofstrength