Cargando…
RAD51 and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: No Evidence for Rare Variant Association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Study
BACKGROUND: Although inherited breast cancer has been associated with germline mutations in genes that are functionally involved in the DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, including BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2 and PALB2, about 70% of breast cancer heritability remains unexpl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3531476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052374 |
_version_ | 1782254186700734464 |
---|---|
author | Le Calvez-Kelm, Florence Oliver, Javier Damiola, Francesca Forey, Nathalie Robinot, Nivonirina Durand, Geoffroy Voegele, Catherine Vallée, Maxime P. Byrnes, Graham Registry, Breast Cancer Family Hopper, John L. Southey, Melissa C. Andrulis, Irene L. John, Esther M. Tavtigian, Sean V. Lesueur, Fabienne |
author_facet | Le Calvez-Kelm, Florence Oliver, Javier Damiola, Francesca Forey, Nathalie Robinot, Nivonirina Durand, Geoffroy Voegele, Catherine Vallée, Maxime P. Byrnes, Graham Registry, Breast Cancer Family Hopper, John L. Southey, Melissa C. Andrulis, Irene L. John, Esther M. Tavtigian, Sean V. Lesueur, Fabienne |
author_sort | Le Calvez-Kelm, Florence |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although inherited breast cancer has been associated with germline mutations in genes that are functionally involved in the DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, including BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2 and PALB2, about 70% of breast cancer heritability remains unexplained. Because of their critical functions in maintaining genome integrity and already well-established associations with breast cancer susceptibility, it is likely that additional genes involved in the HRR pathway harbor sequence variants associated with increased risk of breast cancer. RAD51 plays a central biological function in DNA repair and despite the fact that rare, likely dysfunctional variants in three of its five paralogs, RAD51C, RAD51D, and XRCC2, have been associated with breast and/or ovarian cancer risk, no population-based case-control mutation screening data are available for the RAD51 gene. We thus postulated that RAD51 could harbor rare germline mutations that confer increased risk of breast cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We screened the coding exons and proximal splice junction regions of the gene for germline sequence variation in 1,330 early-onset breast cancer cases and 1,123 controls from the Breast Cancer Family Registry, using the same population-based sampling and analytical strategy that we developed for assessment of rare sequence variants in ATM and CHEK2. In total, 12 distinct very rare or private variants were characterized in RAD51, with 10 cases (0.75%) and 9 controls (0.80%) carrying such a variant. Variants were either likely neutral missense substitutions (3), silent substitutions (4) or non-coding substitutions (5) that were predicted to have little effect on efficiency of the splicing machinery. CONCLUSION: Altogether, our data suggest that RAD51 tolerates so little dysfunctional sequence variation that rare variants in the gene contribute little, if anything, to breast cancer susceptibility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3531476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35314762013-01-08 RAD51 and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: No Evidence for Rare Variant Association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Study Le Calvez-Kelm, Florence Oliver, Javier Damiola, Francesca Forey, Nathalie Robinot, Nivonirina Durand, Geoffroy Voegele, Catherine Vallée, Maxime P. Byrnes, Graham Registry, Breast Cancer Family Hopper, John L. Southey, Melissa C. Andrulis, Irene L. John, Esther M. Tavtigian, Sean V. Lesueur, Fabienne PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Although inherited breast cancer has been associated with germline mutations in genes that are functionally involved in the DNA homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, including BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2 and PALB2, about 70% of breast cancer heritability remains unexplained. Because of their critical functions in maintaining genome integrity and already well-established associations with breast cancer susceptibility, it is likely that additional genes involved in the HRR pathway harbor sequence variants associated with increased risk of breast cancer. RAD51 plays a central biological function in DNA repair and despite the fact that rare, likely dysfunctional variants in three of its five paralogs, RAD51C, RAD51D, and XRCC2, have been associated with breast and/or ovarian cancer risk, no population-based case-control mutation screening data are available for the RAD51 gene. We thus postulated that RAD51 could harbor rare germline mutations that confer increased risk of breast cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We screened the coding exons and proximal splice junction regions of the gene for germline sequence variation in 1,330 early-onset breast cancer cases and 1,123 controls from the Breast Cancer Family Registry, using the same population-based sampling and analytical strategy that we developed for assessment of rare sequence variants in ATM and CHEK2. In total, 12 distinct very rare or private variants were characterized in RAD51, with 10 cases (0.75%) and 9 controls (0.80%) carrying such a variant. Variants were either likely neutral missense substitutions (3), silent substitutions (4) or non-coding substitutions (5) that were predicted to have little effect on efficiency of the splicing machinery. CONCLUSION: Altogether, our data suggest that RAD51 tolerates so little dysfunctional sequence variation that rare variants in the gene contribute little, if anything, to breast cancer susceptibility. Public Library of Science 2012-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3531476/ /pubmed/23300655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052374 Text en © 2012 Le Calvez-Kelm et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Le Calvez-Kelm, Florence Oliver, Javier Damiola, Francesca Forey, Nathalie Robinot, Nivonirina Durand, Geoffroy Voegele, Catherine Vallée, Maxime P. Byrnes, Graham Registry, Breast Cancer Family Hopper, John L. Southey, Melissa C. Andrulis, Irene L. John, Esther M. Tavtigian, Sean V. Lesueur, Fabienne RAD51 and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: No Evidence for Rare Variant Association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Study |
title |
RAD51 and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: No Evidence for Rare Variant Association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Study |
title_full |
RAD51 and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: No Evidence for Rare Variant Association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Study |
title_fullStr |
RAD51 and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: No Evidence for Rare Variant Association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
RAD51 and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: No Evidence for Rare Variant Association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Study |
title_short |
RAD51 and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: No Evidence for Rare Variant Association in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Study |
title_sort | rad51 and breast cancer susceptibility: no evidence for rare variant association in the breast cancer family registry study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3531476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lecalvezkelmflorence rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT oliverjavier rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT damiolafrancesca rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT foreynathalie rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT robinotnivonirina rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT durandgeoffroy rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT voegelecatherine rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT valleemaximep rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT byrnesgraham rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT registrybreastcancerfamily rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT hopperjohnl rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT southeymelissac rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT andrulisirenel rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT johnestherm rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT tavtigianseanv rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy AT lesueurfabienne rad51andbreastcancersusceptibilitynoevidenceforrarevariantassociationinthebreastcancerfamilyregistrystudy |