Cargando…

Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the use of a 3-dimensional gyroscope for measuring the range of motion (ROM) in the impaired shoulder. Reproducibility of digital inclinometer and visual estimation is poor. This study aims to investigate the reproducibility of a tri axial gyroscope in measu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penning, Ludo I F, Guldemond, Nick A, de Bie, Rob A, Walenkamp, GeertHIM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22846646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-135
_version_ 1782254269455400960
author Penning, Ludo I F
Guldemond, Nick A
de Bie, Rob A
Walenkamp, GeertHIM
author_facet Penning, Ludo I F
Guldemond, Nick A
de Bie, Rob A
Walenkamp, GeertHIM
author_sort Penning, Ludo I F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the use of a 3-dimensional gyroscope for measuring the range of motion (ROM) in the impaired shoulder. Reproducibility of digital inclinometer and visual estimation is poor. This study aims to investigate the reproducibility of a tri axial gyroscope in measurement of anteflexion, abduction and related rotations in the impaired shoulder. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with either subacromial impingement (27) or osteoarthritis of the shoulder (31) participated. Active anteflexion, abduction and related rotations were measured with a tri axial gyroscope according to a test retest protocol. Severity of shoulder impairment and patient perceived pain were assessed by the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand score (DASH) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS scores were recorded before and after testing. RESULTS: In two out of three hospitals patients with osteoarthritis (n = 31) were measured, in the third hospital patients with subacromial impingement (n = 27). There were significant differences among hospitals for the VAS and DASH scores measured before and after testing. The mean differences between the test and retest means for anteflexion were −6 degrees (affected side), 9 (contralateral side) and for abduction 15 degrees (affected side) and 10 degrees (contralateral side). Bland & Altman plots showed that the confidence intervals for the mean differences fall within −6 up to 15 degrees, individual test - retest differences could exceed these limits. A simulation according to ‘Generalizability Theory’ produces very good coefficients for anteflexion and related rotation as a comprehensive measure of reproducibility. Optimal reproducibility is achieved with 2 repetitions for anteflexion. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements were influenced by patient perceived pain. Differences in VAS and DASH might be explained by different underlying pathology. These differences in shoulder pathology however did not alter the reproducibility of testing. The use of a tri axial gyroscope is a simple non invasive and reproducible method for the recording of shoulder anteflexion and abduction. Movements have to be repeated twice for reproducible results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3532192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35321922013-01-03 Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction Penning, Ludo I F Guldemond, Nick A de Bie, Rob A Walenkamp, GeertHIM BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the use of a 3-dimensional gyroscope for measuring the range of motion (ROM) in the impaired shoulder. Reproducibility of digital inclinometer and visual estimation is poor. This study aims to investigate the reproducibility of a tri axial gyroscope in measurement of anteflexion, abduction and related rotations in the impaired shoulder. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with either subacromial impingement (27) or osteoarthritis of the shoulder (31) participated. Active anteflexion, abduction and related rotations were measured with a tri axial gyroscope according to a test retest protocol. Severity of shoulder impairment and patient perceived pain were assessed by the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand score (DASH) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). VAS scores were recorded before and after testing. RESULTS: In two out of three hospitals patients with osteoarthritis (n = 31) were measured, in the third hospital patients with subacromial impingement (n = 27). There were significant differences among hospitals for the VAS and DASH scores measured before and after testing. The mean differences between the test and retest means for anteflexion were −6 degrees (affected side), 9 (contralateral side) and for abduction 15 degrees (affected side) and 10 degrees (contralateral side). Bland & Altman plots showed that the confidence intervals for the mean differences fall within −6 up to 15 degrees, individual test - retest differences could exceed these limits. A simulation according to ‘Generalizability Theory’ produces very good coefficients for anteflexion and related rotation as a comprehensive measure of reproducibility. Optimal reproducibility is achieved with 2 repetitions for anteflexion. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements were influenced by patient perceived pain. Differences in VAS and DASH might be explained by different underlying pathology. These differences in shoulder pathology however did not alter the reproducibility of testing. The use of a tri axial gyroscope is a simple non invasive and reproducible method for the recording of shoulder anteflexion and abduction. Movements have to be repeated twice for reproducible results. BioMed Central 2012-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3532192/ /pubmed/22846646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-135 Text en Copyright ©2012 Penning et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Penning, Ludo I F
Guldemond, Nick A
de Bie, Rob A
Walenkamp, GeertHIM
Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction
title Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction
title_full Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction
title_fullStr Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction
title_short Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction
title_sort reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22846646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-13-135
work_keys_str_mv AT penningludoif reproducibilityofa3dimensionalgyroscopeinmeasuringshoulderanteflexionandabduction
AT guldemondnicka reproducibilityofa3dimensionalgyroscopeinmeasuringshoulderanteflexionandabduction
AT debieroba reproducibilityofa3dimensionalgyroscopeinmeasuringshoulderanteflexionandabduction
AT walenkampgeerthim reproducibilityofa3dimensionalgyroscopeinmeasuringshoulderanteflexionandabduction