Cargando…

A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines

BACKGROUND: The use of optimized delivery devices has been shown to enhance the potency of DNA vaccines. However, further optimization of DNA vaccine delivery is needed for this vaccine modality to ultimately be efficacious in humans. METHODS: Herein we evaluated antigen expression and immunogenicit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hallengärd, David, Bråve, Andreas, Isaguliants, Maria, Blomberg, Pontus, Enger, Jenny, Stout, Richard, King, Alan, Wahren, Britta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-10-5
_version_ 1782254281352544256
author Hallengärd, David
Bråve, Andreas
Isaguliants, Maria
Blomberg, Pontus
Enger, Jenny
Stout, Richard
King, Alan
Wahren, Britta
author_facet Hallengärd, David
Bråve, Andreas
Isaguliants, Maria
Blomberg, Pontus
Enger, Jenny
Stout, Richard
King, Alan
Wahren, Britta
author_sort Hallengärd, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of optimized delivery devices has been shown to enhance the potency of DNA vaccines. However, further optimization of DNA vaccine delivery is needed for this vaccine modality to ultimately be efficacious in humans. METHODS: Herein we evaluated antigen expression and immunogenicity after intradermal delivery of different doses of DNA vaccines by needle or by the Biojector jet-injection device, with or without the addition of electroporation (EP). RESULTS: Neither needle injection augmented by EP nor Biojector alone could induce higher magnitudes of immune responses after immunizations with a high dose of DNA. After division of a defined DNA dose into multiple skin sites, the humoral response was particularly enhanced by Biojector while cellular responses were particularly enhanced by EP. Furthermore, a close correlation between in vivo antigen expression and cell-mediated as well as humoral immune responses was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that two optimized DNA vaccine delivery devices can act together to overcome dose restrictions of plasmid DNA vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3532290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35322902013-01-03 A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines Hallengärd, David Bråve, Andreas Isaguliants, Maria Blomberg, Pontus Enger, Jenny Stout, Richard King, Alan Wahren, Britta Genet Vaccines Ther Research BACKGROUND: The use of optimized delivery devices has been shown to enhance the potency of DNA vaccines. However, further optimization of DNA vaccine delivery is needed for this vaccine modality to ultimately be efficacious in humans. METHODS: Herein we evaluated antigen expression and immunogenicity after intradermal delivery of different doses of DNA vaccines by needle or by the Biojector jet-injection device, with or without the addition of electroporation (EP). RESULTS: Neither needle injection augmented by EP nor Biojector alone could induce higher magnitudes of immune responses after immunizations with a high dose of DNA. After division of a defined DNA dose into multiple skin sites, the humoral response was particularly enhanced by Biojector while cellular responses were particularly enhanced by EP. Furthermore, a close correlation between in vivo antigen expression and cell-mediated as well as humoral immune responses was observed. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that two optimized DNA vaccine delivery devices can act together to overcome dose restrictions of plasmid DNA vaccines. BioMed Central 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3532290/ /pubmed/22873174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-10-5 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hallengard et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hallengärd, David
Bråve, Andreas
Isaguliants, Maria
Blomberg, Pontus
Enger, Jenny
Stout, Richard
King, Alan
Wahren, Britta
A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines
title A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines
title_full A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines
title_fullStr A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines
title_full_unstemmed A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines
title_short A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines
title_sort combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of dna vaccines
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22873174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1479-0556-10-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hallengarddavid acombinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT braveandreas acombinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT isaguliantsmaria acombinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT blombergpontus acombinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT engerjenny acombinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT stoutrichard acombinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT kingalan acombinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT wahrenbritta acombinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT hallengarddavid combinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT braveandreas combinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT isaguliantsmaria combinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT blombergpontus combinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT engerjenny combinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT stoutrichard combinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT kingalan combinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines
AT wahrenbritta combinationofintradermaljetinjectionandelectroporationovercomesinvivodoserestrictionofdnavaccines