Cargando…
Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms?
BACKGROUND: There is no doubt that the perceived stigma of having a mental disorder acts as a barrier to help seeking. It is possible that personnel may be reluctant to admit to symptoms suggestive of poor mental health when such data can be linked to them, even if their personal details are only us...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-797 |
_version_ | 1782254290053627904 |
---|---|
author | Fear, Nicola T Seddon, Rachel Jones, Norman Greenberg, Neil Wessely, Simon |
author_facet | Fear, Nicola T Seddon, Rachel Jones, Norman Greenberg, Neil Wessely, Simon |
author_sort | Fear, Nicola T |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is no doubt that the perceived stigma of having a mental disorder acts as a barrier to help seeking. It is possible that personnel may be reluctant to admit to symptoms suggestive of poor mental health when such data can be linked to them, even if their personal details are only used to help them access further care. This may be particularly relevant because individuals who have a mental health problem are more likely to experience barriers to care and hold stigmatizing beliefs. If that is the case, then mental health screening programmers may not be effective in detecting those most in need of care. We aimed to compare mental health symptom reporting when using an anonymous versus identifiable questionnaire among UK military personnel on deployment in Iraq. METHODS: Survey among UK military personnel using two questionnaires, one was anonymous (n = 315) and one collected contact details (i.e. identifiable, n = 296). Distribution was by alternate allocation. Data were collected in Iraq during January-February 2009. RESULTS: No significant difference in the reporting of symptoms of common mental disorders was found (18.1% of identifiable vs. 22.9% of anonymous participants). UK military personnel were more likely to report sub-threshold and probable PTSD when completing questionnaires anonymously (sub-threshold PTSD: 2.4% of identifiable vs. 5.8% of anonymous participants; probable PTSD: 1.7% of identifiable vs. 4.8% of anonymous participants). Of the 11 barriers to care and perceived social stigma statements considered, those completing the anonymous questionnaire compared to those completing the identifiable questionnaire were more likely to endorse three statements: “leaders discourage the use of mental health services” (9.3% vs. 4.6%), “it would be too embarrassing” (41.6% vs. 32.5%) and “I would be seen as weak” (46.6% vs. 34.2%). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant effect on the reporting of sub-threshold and probable PTSD and certain stigmatizing beliefs (but not common mental disorders) when using an anonymous compared to identifiable questionnaire, with the anonymous questionnaire resulting in a higher prevalence of PTSD and increased reporting of three stigmatizing beliefs. This has implications for the conduct of mental health screening and research in the US and UK military. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3532328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35323282013-01-03 Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? Fear, Nicola T Seddon, Rachel Jones, Norman Greenberg, Neil Wessely, Simon BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: There is no doubt that the perceived stigma of having a mental disorder acts as a barrier to help seeking. It is possible that personnel may be reluctant to admit to symptoms suggestive of poor mental health when such data can be linked to them, even if their personal details are only used to help them access further care. This may be particularly relevant because individuals who have a mental health problem are more likely to experience barriers to care and hold stigmatizing beliefs. If that is the case, then mental health screening programmers may not be effective in detecting those most in need of care. We aimed to compare mental health symptom reporting when using an anonymous versus identifiable questionnaire among UK military personnel on deployment in Iraq. METHODS: Survey among UK military personnel using two questionnaires, one was anonymous (n = 315) and one collected contact details (i.e. identifiable, n = 296). Distribution was by alternate allocation. Data were collected in Iraq during January-February 2009. RESULTS: No significant difference in the reporting of symptoms of common mental disorders was found (18.1% of identifiable vs. 22.9% of anonymous participants). UK military personnel were more likely to report sub-threshold and probable PTSD when completing questionnaires anonymously (sub-threshold PTSD: 2.4% of identifiable vs. 5.8% of anonymous participants; probable PTSD: 1.7% of identifiable vs. 4.8% of anonymous participants). Of the 11 barriers to care and perceived social stigma statements considered, those completing the anonymous questionnaire compared to those completing the identifiable questionnaire were more likely to endorse three statements: “leaders discourage the use of mental health services” (9.3% vs. 4.6%), “it would be too embarrassing” (41.6% vs. 32.5%) and “I would be seen as weak” (46.6% vs. 34.2%). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant effect on the reporting of sub-threshold and probable PTSD and certain stigmatizing beliefs (but not common mental disorders) when using an anonymous compared to identifiable questionnaire, with the anonymous questionnaire resulting in a higher prevalence of PTSD and increased reporting of three stigmatizing beliefs. This has implications for the conduct of mental health screening and research in the US and UK military. BioMed Central 2012-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3532328/ /pubmed/22985427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-797 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fear et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fear, Nicola T Seddon, Rachel Jones, Norman Greenberg, Neil Wessely, Simon Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? |
title | Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? |
title_full | Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? |
title_fullStr | Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? |
title_short | Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? |
title_sort | does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-797 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fearnicolat doesanonymityincreasethereportingofmentalhealthsymptoms AT seddonrachel doesanonymityincreasethereportingofmentalhealthsymptoms AT jonesnorman doesanonymityincreasethereportingofmentalhealthsymptoms AT greenbergneil doesanonymityincreasethereportingofmentalhealthsymptoms AT wesselysimon doesanonymityincreasethereportingofmentalhealthsymptoms |