Cargando…
Sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory?
BACKGROUND: Changes that improve the quality of health care should be sustained. Falling back to old, unsatisfactory ways of working is a waste of resources and can in the worst case increase resistance to later initiatives to improve care. Quality improvement relies on changing the clinical system...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22863199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-235 |
_version_ | 1782254303886442496 |
---|---|
author | Hovlid, Einar Bukve, Oddbjørn Haug, Kjell Aslaksen, Aslak Bjarne von Plessen, Christian |
author_facet | Hovlid, Einar Bukve, Oddbjørn Haug, Kjell Aslaksen, Aslak Bjarne von Plessen, Christian |
author_sort | Hovlid, Einar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Changes that improve the quality of health care should be sustained. Falling back to old, unsatisfactory ways of working is a waste of resources and can in the worst case increase resistance to later initiatives to improve care. Quality improvement relies on changing the clinical system yet factors that influence the sustainability of quality improvements are poorly understood. Theoretical frameworks can guide further research on the sustainability of quality improvements. Theories of organizational learning have contributed to a better understanding of organizational change in other contexts. To identify factors contributing to sustainability of improvements, we use learning theory to explore a case that had displayed sustained improvement. METHODS: Førde Hospital redesigned the pathway for elective surgery and achieved sustained reduction of cancellation rates. We used a qualitative case study design informed by theory to explore factors that contributed to sustain the improvements at Førde Hospital. The model Evidence in the Learning Organization describes how organizational learning contributes to change in healthcare institutions. This model constituted the framework for data collection and analysis. We interviewed a strategic sample of 20 employees. The in-depth interviews covered themes identified through our theoretical framework. Through a process of coding and condensing, we identified common themes that were interpreted in relation to our theoretical framework. RESULTS: Clinicians and leaders shared information about their everyday work and related this knowledge to how the entire clinical pathway could be improved. In this way they developed a revised and deeper understanding of their clinical system and its interdependencies. They became increasingly aware of how different elements needed to interact to enhance the performance and how their own efforts could contribute. CONCLUSIONS: The improved understanding of the clinical system represented a change in mental models of employees that influenced how the organization changed its performance. By applying the framework of organizational learning, we learned that changes originating from a new mental model represent double-loop learning. In double-loop learning, deeper system properties are changed, and consequently changes are more likely to be sustained. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3532388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35323882013-01-03 Sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory? Hovlid, Einar Bukve, Oddbjørn Haug, Kjell Aslaksen, Aslak Bjarne von Plessen, Christian BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Changes that improve the quality of health care should be sustained. Falling back to old, unsatisfactory ways of working is a waste of resources and can in the worst case increase resistance to later initiatives to improve care. Quality improvement relies on changing the clinical system yet factors that influence the sustainability of quality improvements are poorly understood. Theoretical frameworks can guide further research on the sustainability of quality improvements. Theories of organizational learning have contributed to a better understanding of organizational change in other contexts. To identify factors contributing to sustainability of improvements, we use learning theory to explore a case that had displayed sustained improvement. METHODS: Førde Hospital redesigned the pathway for elective surgery and achieved sustained reduction of cancellation rates. We used a qualitative case study design informed by theory to explore factors that contributed to sustain the improvements at Førde Hospital. The model Evidence in the Learning Organization describes how organizational learning contributes to change in healthcare institutions. This model constituted the framework for data collection and analysis. We interviewed a strategic sample of 20 employees. The in-depth interviews covered themes identified through our theoretical framework. Through a process of coding and condensing, we identified common themes that were interpreted in relation to our theoretical framework. RESULTS: Clinicians and leaders shared information about their everyday work and related this knowledge to how the entire clinical pathway could be improved. In this way they developed a revised and deeper understanding of their clinical system and its interdependencies. They became increasingly aware of how different elements needed to interact to enhance the performance and how their own efforts could contribute. CONCLUSIONS: The improved understanding of the clinical system represented a change in mental models of employees that influenced how the organization changed its performance. By applying the framework of organizational learning, we learned that changes originating from a new mental model represent double-loop learning. In double-loop learning, deeper system properties are changed, and consequently changes are more likely to be sustained. BioMed Central 2012-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3532388/ /pubmed/22863199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-235 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hovlid et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hovlid, Einar Bukve, Oddbjørn Haug, Kjell Aslaksen, Aslak Bjarne von Plessen, Christian Sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory? |
title | Sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory? |
title_full | Sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory? |
title_fullStr | Sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory? |
title_full_unstemmed | Sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory? |
title_short | Sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory? |
title_sort | sustainability of healthcare improvement: what can we learn from learning theory? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22863199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hovlideinar sustainabilityofhealthcareimprovementwhatcanwelearnfromlearningtheory AT bukveoddbjørn sustainabilityofhealthcareimprovementwhatcanwelearnfromlearningtheory AT haugkjell sustainabilityofhealthcareimprovementwhatcanwelearnfromlearningtheory AT aslaksenaslakbjarne sustainabilityofhealthcareimprovementwhatcanwelearnfromlearningtheory AT vonplessenchristian sustainabilityofhealthcareimprovementwhatcanwelearnfromlearningtheory |