Cargando…
Insulin Resistance and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events in Adults without Diabetes: Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Glucose, insulin and Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) are markers of insulin resistance. The objective of this study is to compare fasting glucose, fasting insulin concentrations and HOMA-IR in strength of association with incident cardiovascular disease. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052036 |
_version_ | 1782254318882127872 |
---|---|
author | Gast, Karin B. Tjeerdema, Nathanja Stijnen, Theo Smit, Johannes W. A. Dekkers, Olaf M. |
author_facet | Gast, Karin B. Tjeerdema, Nathanja Stijnen, Theo Smit, Johannes W. A. Dekkers, Olaf M. |
author_sort | Gast, Karin B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Glucose, insulin and Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) are markers of insulin resistance. The objective of this study is to compare fasting glucose, fasting insulin concentrations and HOMA-IR in strength of association with incident cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March, 2011, and screened reference lists. Cohort studies or nested case-control studies that investigated the association between fasting glucose, fasting insulin or HOMA-IR and incident cardiovascular disease, were eligible. Two investigators independently performed the article selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Cardiovascular endpoints were coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke or combined cardiovascular disease. We used fixed and random-effect meta-analyses to calculate the pooled relative risk for CHD, stroke and combined cardiovascular disease, comparing high to low concentrations of glucose, insulin or HOMA-IR. Study heterogeneity was calculated with the I(2) statistic. To enable a comparison between cardiovascular disease risks for glucose, insulin and HOMA-IR, we calculated pooled relative risks per increase of one standard deviation. RESULTS: We included 65 studies (involving 516,325 participants) in this meta-analysis. In a random-effect meta-analysis the pooled relative risk of CHD (95% CI; I(2)) comparing high to low concentrations was 1.52 (1.31, 1.76; 62.4%) for glucose, 1.12 (0.92, 1.37; 41.0%) for insulin and 1.64 (1.35, 2.00; 0%) for HOMA-IR. The pooled relative risk of CHD per one standard deviation increase was 1.21 (1.13, 1.30; 64.9%) for glucose, 1.04 (0.96, 1.12; 43.0%) for insulin and 1.46 (1.26, 1.69; 0.0%) for HOMA-IR. CONCLUSIONS: The relative risk of cardiovascular disease was higher for an increase of one standard deviation in HOMA-IR compared to an increase of one standard deviation in fasting glucose or fasting insulin concentration. It may be useful to add HOMA-IR to a cardiovascular risk prediction model. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3532497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35324972013-01-08 Insulin Resistance and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events in Adults without Diabetes: Meta-Analysis Gast, Karin B. Tjeerdema, Nathanja Stijnen, Theo Smit, Johannes W. A. Dekkers, Olaf M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Glucose, insulin and Homeostasis Model Assessment Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) are markers of insulin resistance. The objective of this study is to compare fasting glucose, fasting insulin concentrations and HOMA-IR in strength of association with incident cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library databases from inception to March, 2011, and screened reference lists. Cohort studies or nested case-control studies that investigated the association between fasting glucose, fasting insulin or HOMA-IR and incident cardiovascular disease, were eligible. Two investigators independently performed the article selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Cardiovascular endpoints were coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke or combined cardiovascular disease. We used fixed and random-effect meta-analyses to calculate the pooled relative risk for CHD, stroke and combined cardiovascular disease, comparing high to low concentrations of glucose, insulin or HOMA-IR. Study heterogeneity was calculated with the I(2) statistic. To enable a comparison between cardiovascular disease risks for glucose, insulin and HOMA-IR, we calculated pooled relative risks per increase of one standard deviation. RESULTS: We included 65 studies (involving 516,325 participants) in this meta-analysis. In a random-effect meta-analysis the pooled relative risk of CHD (95% CI; I(2)) comparing high to low concentrations was 1.52 (1.31, 1.76; 62.4%) for glucose, 1.12 (0.92, 1.37; 41.0%) for insulin and 1.64 (1.35, 2.00; 0%) for HOMA-IR. The pooled relative risk of CHD per one standard deviation increase was 1.21 (1.13, 1.30; 64.9%) for glucose, 1.04 (0.96, 1.12; 43.0%) for insulin and 1.46 (1.26, 1.69; 0.0%) for HOMA-IR. CONCLUSIONS: The relative risk of cardiovascular disease was higher for an increase of one standard deviation in HOMA-IR compared to an increase of one standard deviation in fasting glucose or fasting insulin concentration. It may be useful to add HOMA-IR to a cardiovascular risk prediction model. Public Library of Science 2012-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3532497/ /pubmed/23300589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052036 Text en © 2012 Gast et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gast, Karin B. Tjeerdema, Nathanja Stijnen, Theo Smit, Johannes W. A. Dekkers, Olaf M. Insulin Resistance and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events in Adults without Diabetes: Meta-Analysis |
title | Insulin Resistance and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events in Adults without Diabetes: Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Insulin Resistance and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events in Adults without Diabetes: Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Insulin Resistance and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events in Adults without Diabetes: Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Insulin Resistance and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events in Adults without Diabetes: Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Insulin Resistance and Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Events in Adults without Diabetes: Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | insulin resistance and risk of incident cardiovascular events in adults without diabetes: meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052036 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gastkarinb insulinresistanceandriskofincidentcardiovasculareventsinadultswithoutdiabetesmetaanalysis AT tjeerdemanathanja insulinresistanceandriskofincidentcardiovasculareventsinadultswithoutdiabetesmetaanalysis AT stijnentheo insulinresistanceandriskofincidentcardiovasculareventsinadultswithoutdiabetesmetaanalysis AT smitjohanneswa insulinresistanceandriskofincidentcardiovasculareventsinadultswithoutdiabetesmetaanalysis AT dekkersolafm insulinresistanceandriskofincidentcardiovasculareventsinadultswithoutdiabetesmetaanalysis |