Cargando…
Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in Subfertility: A Comparison of Two Different Approaches
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews are used widely to guide health care decisions. Several tools have been created to assess systematic review quality. The measurement tool for assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews known as the AMSTAR tool applies a yes/no score to eleven relevant d...
Autores principales: | Popovich, Ivor, Windsor, Bethany, Jordan, Vanessa, Showell, Marian, Shea, Bev, Farquhar, Cynthia M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050403 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is our public research money well spent? Publication of research outputs from Health Research Council of New Zealand-funded studies: a cross-sectional study
por: Showell, Marian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Publication bias in trials registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: Is it a problem? A cross-sectional study
por: Showell, Marian, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Thyroid dysfunction and subfertility
por: Cho, Moon Kyoung
Publicado: (2015) -
Endocrine management of male subfertility
por: George, Belinda, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Male subfertility and oxidative stress
por: Evans, Emily P.P., et al.
Publicado: (2021)