Cargando…

Dosimetric verification of source strength for HDR afterloading units with Ir-192 and Co-60 photon sources: Comparison of three different international protocols

Before clinical use of a brachytherapy source, regulations or recommendations by medical physics societies require an independent measurement of its air kerma strength by a qualified medical physicist. Currently, in addition to Ir-192, also HDR-Co-60 sources are increasingly coming into operation. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azhari, Hasin A., Hensley, Frank, Schütte, Wilhelm, Zakaria, Golam A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23293449
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.103603
_version_ 1782254336402784256
author Azhari, Hasin A.
Hensley, Frank
Schütte, Wilhelm
Zakaria, Golam A.
author_facet Azhari, Hasin A.
Hensley, Frank
Schütte, Wilhelm
Zakaria, Golam A.
author_sort Azhari, Hasin A.
collection PubMed
description Before clinical use of a brachytherapy source, regulations or recommendations by medical physics societies require an independent measurement of its air kerma strength by a qualified medical physicist. Currently, in addition to Ir-192, also HDR-Co-60 sources are increasingly coming into operation. However, the existing dosimetry protocols do not provide any guidelines for Co-60 sources. The purpose of this work was therefore to compare air kerma rate measurements as recommended by different dosimetry protocols for Ir-192 HDR sources and to test their applicability to Co-60 sources. Dosimetric verification of HDR afterloading source specification was performed according to three protocols, DIN 6809-2 (1993) in combination with DGMP-Report 13 (2006), IAEA-TECDOC-1274 (2002) and AAPM Report 41 (1993) for the nuclides Ir-192 and Co-60. Measurements of the sources reference air kerma rate were performed with 3 different methods (with a cylindrical chamber both in a solid phantom and in free air, and with a well chamber) and evaluated using all three protocols for each type of source and method of measurement. The measurements with all protocols and methods show deviations from the certified specification smaller than about 1.2% for Ir-192 and 2.5% for Co-60-Sources. The measurements with the well chamber showed the lowest deviations from the certificate value. Air kerma rate measurements for Co-60 HDR sources using the existing protocols are possible with accuracy sufficient to verify source calibration as provided by the source certificate. However, extension of the protocols by correction factors for measurement with Co-60 sources would be helpful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3532746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35327462013-01-04 Dosimetric verification of source strength for HDR afterloading units with Ir-192 and Co-60 photon sources: Comparison of three different international protocols Azhari, Hasin A. Hensley, Frank Schütte, Wilhelm Zakaria, Golam A. J Med Phys Invited Article Before clinical use of a brachytherapy source, regulations or recommendations by medical physics societies require an independent measurement of its air kerma strength by a qualified medical physicist. Currently, in addition to Ir-192, also HDR-Co-60 sources are increasingly coming into operation. However, the existing dosimetry protocols do not provide any guidelines for Co-60 sources. The purpose of this work was therefore to compare air kerma rate measurements as recommended by different dosimetry protocols for Ir-192 HDR sources and to test their applicability to Co-60 sources. Dosimetric verification of HDR afterloading source specification was performed according to three protocols, DIN 6809-2 (1993) in combination with DGMP-Report 13 (2006), IAEA-TECDOC-1274 (2002) and AAPM Report 41 (1993) for the nuclides Ir-192 and Co-60. Measurements of the sources reference air kerma rate were performed with 3 different methods (with a cylindrical chamber both in a solid phantom and in free air, and with a well chamber) and evaluated using all three protocols for each type of source and method of measurement. The measurements with all protocols and methods show deviations from the certified specification smaller than about 1.2% for Ir-192 and 2.5% for Co-60-Sources. The measurements with the well chamber showed the lowest deviations from the certificate value. Air kerma rate measurements for Co-60 HDR sources using the existing protocols are possible with accuracy sufficient to verify source calibration as provided by the source certificate. However, extension of the protocols by correction factors for measurement with Co-60 sources would be helpful. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3532746/ /pubmed/23293449 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.103603 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Article
Azhari, Hasin A.
Hensley, Frank
Schütte, Wilhelm
Zakaria, Golam A.
Dosimetric verification of source strength for HDR afterloading units with Ir-192 and Co-60 photon sources: Comparison of three different international protocols
title Dosimetric verification of source strength for HDR afterloading units with Ir-192 and Co-60 photon sources: Comparison of three different international protocols
title_full Dosimetric verification of source strength for HDR afterloading units with Ir-192 and Co-60 photon sources: Comparison of three different international protocols
title_fullStr Dosimetric verification of source strength for HDR afterloading units with Ir-192 and Co-60 photon sources: Comparison of three different international protocols
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric verification of source strength for HDR afterloading units with Ir-192 and Co-60 photon sources: Comparison of three different international protocols
title_short Dosimetric verification of source strength for HDR afterloading units with Ir-192 and Co-60 photon sources: Comparison of three different international protocols
title_sort dosimetric verification of source strength for hdr afterloading units with ir-192 and co-60 photon sources: comparison of three different international protocols
topic Invited Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23293449
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.103603
work_keys_str_mv AT azharihasina dosimetricverificationofsourcestrengthforhdrafterloadingunitswithir192andco60photonsourcescomparisonofthreedifferentinternationalprotocols
AT hensleyfrank dosimetricverificationofsourcestrengthforhdrafterloadingunitswithir192andco60photonsourcescomparisonofthreedifferentinternationalprotocols
AT schuttewilhelm dosimetricverificationofsourcestrengthforhdrafterloadingunitswithir192andco60photonsourcescomparisonofthreedifferentinternationalprotocols
AT zakariagolama dosimetricverificationofsourcestrengthforhdrafterloadingunitswithir192andco60photonsourcescomparisonofthreedifferentinternationalprotocols