Cargando…

A randomised efficacy and discontinuation study of etanercept versus adalimumab (RED SEA) for rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic, unblinded, non-inferiority study of first TNF inhibitor use: outcomes over 2 years

OBJECTIVE: To compare adalimumab versus etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to test the hypothesis that adalimumab was not inferior to etanercept in terms of drug continuation by a margin of 15% after 52 weeks of treatment. DESIGN: Pragmatic, randomised, parallel group, mult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jobanputra, Paresh, Maggs, Fiona, Deeming, Alison, Carruthers, David, Rankin, Elizabeth, Jordan, Alison C, Faizal, Abdul, Goddard, Carolyn, Pugh, Mark, Bowman, Simon J, Brailsford, Sue, Nightingale, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001395
_version_ 1782254364769910784
author Jobanputra, Paresh
Maggs, Fiona
Deeming, Alison
Carruthers, David
Rankin, Elizabeth
Jordan, Alison C
Faizal, Abdul
Goddard, Carolyn
Pugh, Mark
Bowman, Simon J
Brailsford, Sue
Nightingale, Peter
author_facet Jobanputra, Paresh
Maggs, Fiona
Deeming, Alison
Carruthers, David
Rankin, Elizabeth
Jordan, Alison C
Faizal, Abdul
Goddard, Carolyn
Pugh, Mark
Bowman, Simon J
Brailsford, Sue
Nightingale, Peter
author_sort Jobanputra, Paresh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare adalimumab versus etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to test the hypothesis that adalimumab was not inferior to etanercept in terms of drug continuation by a margin of 15% after 52 weeks of treatment. DESIGN: Pragmatic, randomised, parallel group, multicentre, unblinded and non-inferiority trial. Randomisation stratified by baseline use of methotrexate. PARTICIPANTS: 125 adults with active RA despite treatment with two disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs), including methotrexate randomised (1 : 1) to adalimumab 40 mg alternate weeks or etanercept 50 mg weekly, added to existing medication. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was proportion of patients continuing treatment after 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included: disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28), treatment satisfaction (TSQM V.2), health status (Euroqol-5D), drug toxicity and persistence with therapy after 2 years. RESULTS: Persistence with therapy was 65% for adalimumab versus 56.7% for etanercept (one-sided 95% CI for proportion still taking adalimumab minus proportion on etanercept ≥−7.9%); demonstrating non-inferiority at the 15% margin. After 2 years these figures were: adalimumab 58.3% and etanecept 43.3% (CI ≥−1.7%). The proportion of good, moderate and non-responders based on DAS28-C reactive protein, after 52 weeks, were 26.3%, 33.3% and 40.4%, respectively, for adalimumab versus 16.7%, 31.7% and 51.7%, respectively, for etanercept (p=0.158). Baseline median EQ-5D scores improved from 0.52 to 0.69 for adalimumab and from 0.52 to 0.64 for etanercept (p=0.046) after 52 weeks. Global satisfaction, effectiveness, side effects and convenience scores based on the TSQM were similar for both drugs. Fourteen serious adverse events occurred including two deaths from myocardial infarction, one patient with ovarian cancer and one with acute myeloid leukaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians choosing a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor for active RA, despite trying two DMARDs including methotrexate, may choose either adalimumab or etanercept in the knowledge that these drugs are similarly effective. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EU Clinical Trials Register 2006-006275-21/GB.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3532970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35329702013-01-04 A randomised efficacy and discontinuation study of etanercept versus adalimumab (RED SEA) for rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic, unblinded, non-inferiority study of first TNF inhibitor use: outcomes over 2 years Jobanputra, Paresh Maggs, Fiona Deeming, Alison Carruthers, David Rankin, Elizabeth Jordan, Alison C Faizal, Abdul Goddard, Carolyn Pugh, Mark Bowman, Simon J Brailsford, Sue Nightingale, Peter BMJ Open Rheumatology OBJECTIVE: To compare adalimumab versus etanercept in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to test the hypothesis that adalimumab was not inferior to etanercept in terms of drug continuation by a margin of 15% after 52 weeks of treatment. DESIGN: Pragmatic, randomised, parallel group, multicentre, unblinded and non-inferiority trial. Randomisation stratified by baseline use of methotrexate. PARTICIPANTS: 125 adults with active RA despite treatment with two disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs), including methotrexate randomised (1 : 1) to adalimumab 40 mg alternate weeks or etanercept 50 mg weekly, added to existing medication. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was proportion of patients continuing treatment after 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes included: disease activity score using 28 joints (DAS28), treatment satisfaction (TSQM V.2), health status (Euroqol-5D), drug toxicity and persistence with therapy after 2 years. RESULTS: Persistence with therapy was 65% for adalimumab versus 56.7% for etanercept (one-sided 95% CI for proportion still taking adalimumab minus proportion on etanercept ≥−7.9%); demonstrating non-inferiority at the 15% margin. After 2 years these figures were: adalimumab 58.3% and etanecept 43.3% (CI ≥−1.7%). The proportion of good, moderate and non-responders based on DAS28-C reactive protein, after 52 weeks, were 26.3%, 33.3% and 40.4%, respectively, for adalimumab versus 16.7%, 31.7% and 51.7%, respectively, for etanercept (p=0.158). Baseline median EQ-5D scores improved from 0.52 to 0.69 for adalimumab and from 0.52 to 0.64 for etanercept (p=0.046) after 52 weeks. Global satisfaction, effectiveness, side effects and convenience scores based on the TSQM were similar for both drugs. Fourteen serious adverse events occurred including two deaths from myocardial infarction, one patient with ovarian cancer and one with acute myeloid leukaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians choosing a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor for active RA, despite trying two DMARDs including methotrexate, may choose either adalimumab or etanercept in the knowledge that these drugs are similarly effective. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EU Clinical Trials Register 2006-006275-21/GB. BMJ Publishing Group 2012-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3532970/ /pubmed/23148339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001395 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Rheumatology
Jobanputra, Paresh
Maggs, Fiona
Deeming, Alison
Carruthers, David
Rankin, Elizabeth
Jordan, Alison C
Faizal, Abdul
Goddard, Carolyn
Pugh, Mark
Bowman, Simon J
Brailsford, Sue
Nightingale, Peter
A randomised efficacy and discontinuation study of etanercept versus adalimumab (RED SEA) for rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic, unblinded, non-inferiority study of first TNF inhibitor use: outcomes over 2 years
title A randomised efficacy and discontinuation study of etanercept versus adalimumab (RED SEA) for rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic, unblinded, non-inferiority study of first TNF inhibitor use: outcomes over 2 years
title_full A randomised efficacy and discontinuation study of etanercept versus adalimumab (RED SEA) for rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic, unblinded, non-inferiority study of first TNF inhibitor use: outcomes over 2 years
title_fullStr A randomised efficacy and discontinuation study of etanercept versus adalimumab (RED SEA) for rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic, unblinded, non-inferiority study of first TNF inhibitor use: outcomes over 2 years
title_full_unstemmed A randomised efficacy and discontinuation study of etanercept versus adalimumab (RED SEA) for rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic, unblinded, non-inferiority study of first TNF inhibitor use: outcomes over 2 years
title_short A randomised efficacy and discontinuation study of etanercept versus adalimumab (RED SEA) for rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic, unblinded, non-inferiority study of first TNF inhibitor use: outcomes over 2 years
title_sort randomised efficacy and discontinuation study of etanercept versus adalimumab (red sea) for rheumatoid arthritis: a pragmatic, unblinded, non-inferiority study of first tnf inhibitor use: outcomes over 2 years
topic Rheumatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23148339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001395
work_keys_str_mv AT jobanputraparesh arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT maggsfiona arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT deemingalison arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT carruthersdavid arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT rankinelizabeth arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT jordanalisonc arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT faizalabdul arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT goddardcarolyn arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT pughmark arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT bowmansimonj arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT brailsfordsue arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT nightingalepeter arandomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT jobanputraparesh randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT maggsfiona randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT deemingalison randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT carruthersdavid randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT rankinelizabeth randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT jordanalisonc randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT faizalabdul randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT goddardcarolyn randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT pughmark randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT bowmansimonj randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT brailsfordsue randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years
AT nightingalepeter randomisedefficacyanddiscontinuationstudyofetanerceptversusadalimumabredseaforrheumatoidarthritisapragmaticunblindednoninferioritystudyoffirsttnfinhibitoruseoutcomesover2years