Cargando…

Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, Baby-Led Weaning: a content analysis study

OBJECTIVE: Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) is an alternative approach for introducing complementary foods to infants that emphasises infant self-feeding rather than adult spoon-feeding. Here we examined healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, BLW. DESIGN, SETTI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cameron, Sonya Lynne, Heath, Anne-Louise Mary, Taylor, Rachael Waring
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23183112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001542
_version_ 1782254367068389376
author Cameron, Sonya Lynne
Heath, Anne-Louise Mary
Taylor, Rachael Waring
author_facet Cameron, Sonya Lynne
Heath, Anne-Louise Mary
Taylor, Rachael Waring
author_sort Cameron, Sonya Lynne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) is an alternative approach for introducing complementary foods to infants that emphasises infant self-feeding rather than adult spoon-feeding. Here we examined healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, BLW. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare professionals (n=31) and mothers who had used BLW (n=20) completed a semistructured interview using one of two tailored interview schedules examining their knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, BLW. Interview notes and transcripts were analysed using content analysis to identify subcategories and extract illustrative quotes. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals had limited direct experience with BLW and the main concerns raised were the potential for increased risk of choking, iron deficiency and inadequate energy intake. Although they suggested a number of potential benefits of BLW (greater opportunity for shared family meal times, fewer mealtime battles, healthier eating behaviours, greater convenience and possible developmental advantages) most felt reluctant to recommend BLW because of their concern about the potential increased risk of choking. In contrast, mothers who had used this style of feeding reported no major concerns with BLW. They considered BLW to be a healthier, more convenient and less stressful way to introduce complementary foods to their infant and recommended this feeding approach to other mothers. Although mothers did not report being concerned about choking, 30% reported at least one choking episode—most commonly with raw apple. CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of research on BLW, further work is needed to determine whether the concerns expressed by healthcare professionals and potential benefits outlined by mothers are valid. The current study suggests that there is a mismatch between healthcare professionals' and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences, with BLW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3532980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35329802013-01-04 Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, Baby-Led Weaning: a content analysis study Cameron, Sonya Lynne Heath, Anne-Louise Mary Taylor, Rachael Waring BMJ Open Nutrition and Metabolism OBJECTIVE: Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) is an alternative approach for introducing complementary foods to infants that emphasises infant self-feeding rather than adult spoon-feeding. Here we examined healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, BLW. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare professionals (n=31) and mothers who had used BLW (n=20) completed a semistructured interview using one of two tailored interview schedules examining their knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, BLW. Interview notes and transcripts were analysed using content analysis to identify subcategories and extract illustrative quotes. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals had limited direct experience with BLW and the main concerns raised were the potential for increased risk of choking, iron deficiency and inadequate energy intake. Although they suggested a number of potential benefits of BLW (greater opportunity for shared family meal times, fewer mealtime battles, healthier eating behaviours, greater convenience and possible developmental advantages) most felt reluctant to recommend BLW because of their concern about the potential increased risk of choking. In contrast, mothers who had used this style of feeding reported no major concerns with BLW. They considered BLW to be a healthier, more convenient and less stressful way to introduce complementary foods to their infant and recommended this feeding approach to other mothers. Although mothers did not report being concerned about choking, 30% reported at least one choking episode—most commonly with raw apple. CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of research on BLW, further work is needed to determine whether the concerns expressed by healthcare professionals and potential benefits outlined by mothers are valid. The current study suggests that there is a mismatch between healthcare professionals' and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences, with BLW. BMJ Publishing Group 2012-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3532980/ /pubmed/23183112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001542 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Nutrition and Metabolism
Cameron, Sonya Lynne
Heath, Anne-Louise Mary
Taylor, Rachael Waring
Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, Baby-Led Weaning: a content analysis study
title Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, Baby-Led Weaning: a content analysis study
title_full Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, Baby-Led Weaning: a content analysis study
title_fullStr Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, Baby-Led Weaning: a content analysis study
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, Baby-Led Weaning: a content analysis study
title_short Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, Baby-Led Weaning: a content analysis study
title_sort healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ knowledge of, attitudes to and experiences with, baby-led weaning: a content analysis study
topic Nutrition and Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23183112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001542
work_keys_str_mv AT cameronsonyalynne healthcareprofessionalsandmothersknowledgeofattitudestoandexperienceswithbabyledweaningacontentanalysisstudy
AT heathannelouisemary healthcareprofessionalsandmothersknowledgeofattitudestoandexperienceswithbabyledweaningacontentanalysisstudy
AT taylorrachaelwaring healthcareprofessionalsandmothersknowledgeofattitudestoandexperienceswithbabyledweaningacontentanalysisstudy