Cargando…
Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether clinical teams would direct patients to use web-based patient decision support interventions (DESIs) and whether patients would use them. DESIGN: Retrospective semistructured interviews and web server log analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: 57 NHS professionals (nurses,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23204075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001530 |
_version_ | 1782254367294881792 |
---|---|
author | Elwyn, Glyn Rix, Andrew Holt, Tom Jones, Deborah |
author_facet | Elwyn, Glyn Rix, Andrew Holt, Tom Jones, Deborah |
author_sort | Elwyn, Glyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether clinical teams would direct patients to use web-based patient decision support interventions (DESIs) and whether patients would use them. DESIGN: Retrospective semistructured interviews and web server log analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: 57 NHS professionals (nurses, doctors and others) in orthopaedic, antenatal, breast, urology clinics and in primary care practices across 22 NHS sites given access to DESIs hosted on the NHS Direct website. RESULTS: Fewer than expected patients were directed to use the web tools. The most significant obstacles to referral to the tools were the attitudes of clinicians and clinical teams. Technical problems contributed to the problems but the low uptake was mainly explained by clinicians’ limited understanding of how patient DESIs could be helpful in clinical pathways, their perception that ‘shared decision-making’ was already commonplace and that, in their view, some patients are resistant to being involved in treatment decisions. External factors, such as efficiency targets and ‘best practice’ recommendations were also cited being significant barriers. Clinicians did not feel the need to refer patients to use decision support tools, web-based or not, and, as a result, felt no requirement to change existing practice routines. Uptake is highest when clinicians set expectations that these tools are integral to practice and embed their use into clinical pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Existing evidence of patient benefit and the free availability of patient DESIs via the web are not sufficient drivers to achieve routine use. Health professionals were not motivated to refer patients to these interventions. Clinicians will not use these interventions simply because they are made available, despite good evidence of benefit to patients. These attitudes are deep seated and will not be modified by solely developing web-based interventions: a broader strategy will be required to embed DESIs into routine practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3532981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35329812013-01-04 Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS Elwyn, Glyn Rix, Andrew Holt, Tom Jones, Deborah BMJ Open Evidence-Based Practice OBJECTIVE: To assess whether clinical teams would direct patients to use web-based patient decision support interventions (DESIs) and whether patients would use them. DESIGN: Retrospective semistructured interviews and web server log analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTINGS: 57 NHS professionals (nurses, doctors and others) in orthopaedic, antenatal, breast, urology clinics and in primary care practices across 22 NHS sites given access to DESIs hosted on the NHS Direct website. RESULTS: Fewer than expected patients were directed to use the web tools. The most significant obstacles to referral to the tools were the attitudes of clinicians and clinical teams. Technical problems contributed to the problems but the low uptake was mainly explained by clinicians’ limited understanding of how patient DESIs could be helpful in clinical pathways, their perception that ‘shared decision-making’ was already commonplace and that, in their view, some patients are resistant to being involved in treatment decisions. External factors, such as efficiency targets and ‘best practice’ recommendations were also cited being significant barriers. Clinicians did not feel the need to refer patients to use decision support tools, web-based or not, and, as a result, felt no requirement to change existing practice routines. Uptake is highest when clinicians set expectations that these tools are integral to practice and embed their use into clinical pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Existing evidence of patient benefit and the free availability of patient DESIs via the web are not sufficient drivers to achieve routine use. Health professionals were not motivated to refer patients to these interventions. Clinicians will not use these interventions simply because they are made available, despite good evidence of benefit to patients. These attitudes are deep seated and will not be modified by solely developing web-based interventions: a broader strategy will be required to embed DESIs into routine practice. BMJ Publishing Group 2012-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3532981/ /pubmed/23204075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001530 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Evidence-Based Practice Elwyn, Glyn Rix, Andrew Holt, Tom Jones, Deborah Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS |
title | Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS |
title_full | Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS |
title_fullStr | Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS |
title_full_unstemmed | Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS |
title_short | Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS |
title_sort | why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? interviews with front line clinics in the nhs |
topic | Evidence-Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3532981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23204075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elwynglyn whydocliniciansnotreferpatientstoonlinedecisionsupporttoolsinterviewswithfrontlineclinicsinthenhs AT rixandrew whydocliniciansnotreferpatientstoonlinedecisionsupporttoolsinterviewswithfrontlineclinicsinthenhs AT holttom whydocliniciansnotreferpatientstoonlinedecisionsupporttoolsinterviewswithfrontlineclinicsinthenhs AT jonesdeborah whydocliniciansnotreferpatientstoonlinedecisionsupporttoolsinterviewswithfrontlineclinicsinthenhs |