Cargando…

Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Implementing venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment guidance on admission to hospital has proved difficult worldwide. In 2010, VTE risk assessment in English hospitals was linked to financial sanctions. This study investigated possible barriers and facilitators for VTE risk assessm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basey, Avril Janette, Krska, Janet, Kennedy, Tom D, Mackridge, Adam John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23135540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001668
_version_ 1782254373451071488
author Basey, Avril Janette
Krska, Janet
Kennedy, Tom D
Mackridge, Adam John
author_facet Basey, Avril Janette
Krska, Janet
Kennedy, Tom D
Mackridge, Adam John
author_sort Basey, Avril Janette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementing venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment guidance on admission to hospital has proved difficult worldwide. In 2010, VTE risk assessment in English hospitals was linked to financial sanctions. This study investigated possible barriers and facilitators for VTE risk assessment in medical patients and evaluated the impact of local and national initiatives. SETTING: Acute Medical Unit in one English National Health Service university teaching hospital. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study; National Research Ethics Service approval was granted. Data were collected over four 1-week periods; November 2009 (1), January 2010 (2), April 2010 (3) and April 2011 (4). Case notes for all medical patients admitted during these periods were reviewed. Thirty-six staff were observed admitting 71 of these patients; 24 observed staff participated in a structured interview. RESULTS: 876 case notes were reviewed. In total, 82.1% of patients had one or more VTE risk factors and 25.3% one or more bleeding risks. VTE risk assessment rose from a baseline of 6.9–19.6%, following local initiatives, and to 98.7% following financially sanctioned government targets. A similar increase in appropriate prescribing of prophylaxis was seen, but inappropriate prescribing also rose. No staff observed in period 1 conducted VTE risk assessment, risk-assessment forms were largely ignored or discarded during period 2; and electronic recording systems available during period 3 were not accessed. Few patients were asked any VTE-related questions in periods 1, 2 or 3. Interviewees’ actual knowledge of VTE risk was not related to perceived knowledge level. Eight of the 24 staff interviewed were aware of national policies or guidance: none had seen them. Principal barriers identified to risk assessment were: involvement of multiple staff in individual admissions; interruptions; lack of policy awareness; time pressure and complexity of tools. CONCLUSIONS: National financial sanctions appear effective in implementing guidance, where other local measures have failed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3533008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35330082013-01-04 Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study Basey, Avril Janette Krska, Janet Kennedy, Tom D Mackridge, Adam John BMJ Open Health Services Research BACKGROUND: Implementing venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment guidance on admission to hospital has proved difficult worldwide. In 2010, VTE risk assessment in English hospitals was linked to financial sanctions. This study investigated possible barriers and facilitators for VTE risk assessment in medical patients and evaluated the impact of local and national initiatives. SETTING: Acute Medical Unit in one English National Health Service university teaching hospital. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study; National Research Ethics Service approval was granted. Data were collected over four 1-week periods; November 2009 (1), January 2010 (2), April 2010 (3) and April 2011 (4). Case notes for all medical patients admitted during these periods were reviewed. Thirty-six staff were observed admitting 71 of these patients; 24 observed staff participated in a structured interview. RESULTS: 876 case notes were reviewed. In total, 82.1% of patients had one or more VTE risk factors and 25.3% one or more bleeding risks. VTE risk assessment rose from a baseline of 6.9–19.6%, following local initiatives, and to 98.7% following financially sanctioned government targets. A similar increase in appropriate prescribing of prophylaxis was seen, but inappropriate prescribing also rose. No staff observed in period 1 conducted VTE risk assessment, risk-assessment forms were largely ignored or discarded during period 2; and electronic recording systems available during period 3 were not accessed. Few patients were asked any VTE-related questions in periods 1, 2 or 3. Interviewees’ actual knowledge of VTE risk was not related to perceived knowledge level. Eight of the 24 staff interviewed were aware of national policies or guidance: none had seen them. Principal barriers identified to risk assessment were: involvement of multiple staff in individual admissions; interruptions; lack of policy awareness; time pressure and complexity of tools. CONCLUSIONS: National financial sanctions appear effective in implementing guidance, where other local measures have failed. BMJ Publishing Group 2012-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3533008/ /pubmed/23135540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001668 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Basey, Avril Janette
Krska, Janet
Kennedy, Tom D
Mackridge, Adam John
Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study
title Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study
title_full Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study
title_short Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study
title_sort challenges in implementing government-directed vte guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23135540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001668
work_keys_str_mv AT baseyavriljanette challengesinimplementinggovernmentdirectedvteguidanceformedicalpatientsamixedmethodsstudy
AT krskajanet challengesinimplementinggovernmentdirectedvteguidanceformedicalpatientsamixedmethodsstudy
AT kennedytomd challengesinimplementinggovernmentdirectedvteguidanceformedicalpatientsamixedmethodsstudy
AT mackridgeadamjohn challengesinimplementinggovernmentdirectedvteguidanceformedicalpatientsamixedmethodsstudy