Cargando…
Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study
BACKGROUND: Implementing venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment guidance on admission to hospital has proved difficult worldwide. In 2010, VTE risk assessment in English hospitals was linked to financial sanctions. This study investigated possible barriers and facilitators for VTE risk assessm...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23135540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001668 |
_version_ | 1782254373451071488 |
---|---|
author | Basey, Avril Janette Krska, Janet Kennedy, Tom D Mackridge, Adam John |
author_facet | Basey, Avril Janette Krska, Janet Kennedy, Tom D Mackridge, Adam John |
author_sort | Basey, Avril Janette |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Implementing venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment guidance on admission to hospital has proved difficult worldwide. In 2010, VTE risk assessment in English hospitals was linked to financial sanctions. This study investigated possible barriers and facilitators for VTE risk assessment in medical patients and evaluated the impact of local and national initiatives. SETTING: Acute Medical Unit in one English National Health Service university teaching hospital. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study; National Research Ethics Service approval was granted. Data were collected over four 1-week periods; November 2009 (1), January 2010 (2), April 2010 (3) and April 2011 (4). Case notes for all medical patients admitted during these periods were reviewed. Thirty-six staff were observed admitting 71 of these patients; 24 observed staff participated in a structured interview. RESULTS: 876 case notes were reviewed. In total, 82.1% of patients had one or more VTE risk factors and 25.3% one or more bleeding risks. VTE risk assessment rose from a baseline of 6.9–19.6%, following local initiatives, and to 98.7% following financially sanctioned government targets. A similar increase in appropriate prescribing of prophylaxis was seen, but inappropriate prescribing also rose. No staff observed in period 1 conducted VTE risk assessment, risk-assessment forms were largely ignored or discarded during period 2; and electronic recording systems available during period 3 were not accessed. Few patients were asked any VTE-related questions in periods 1, 2 or 3. Interviewees’ actual knowledge of VTE risk was not related to perceived knowledge level. Eight of the 24 staff interviewed were aware of national policies or guidance: none had seen them. Principal barriers identified to risk assessment were: involvement of multiple staff in individual admissions; interruptions; lack of policy awareness; time pressure and complexity of tools. CONCLUSIONS: National financial sanctions appear effective in implementing guidance, where other local measures have failed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3533008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35330082013-01-04 Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study Basey, Avril Janette Krska, Janet Kennedy, Tom D Mackridge, Adam John BMJ Open Health Services Research BACKGROUND: Implementing venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment guidance on admission to hospital has proved difficult worldwide. In 2010, VTE risk assessment in English hospitals was linked to financial sanctions. This study investigated possible barriers and facilitators for VTE risk assessment in medical patients and evaluated the impact of local and national initiatives. SETTING: Acute Medical Unit in one English National Health Service university teaching hospital. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study; National Research Ethics Service approval was granted. Data were collected over four 1-week periods; November 2009 (1), January 2010 (2), April 2010 (3) and April 2011 (4). Case notes for all medical patients admitted during these periods were reviewed. Thirty-six staff were observed admitting 71 of these patients; 24 observed staff participated in a structured interview. RESULTS: 876 case notes were reviewed. In total, 82.1% of patients had one or more VTE risk factors and 25.3% one or more bleeding risks. VTE risk assessment rose from a baseline of 6.9–19.6%, following local initiatives, and to 98.7% following financially sanctioned government targets. A similar increase in appropriate prescribing of prophylaxis was seen, but inappropriate prescribing also rose. No staff observed in period 1 conducted VTE risk assessment, risk-assessment forms were largely ignored or discarded during period 2; and electronic recording systems available during period 3 were not accessed. Few patients were asked any VTE-related questions in periods 1, 2 or 3. Interviewees’ actual knowledge of VTE risk was not related to perceived knowledge level. Eight of the 24 staff interviewed were aware of national policies or guidance: none had seen them. Principal barriers identified to risk assessment were: involvement of multiple staff in individual admissions; interruptions; lack of policy awareness; time pressure and complexity of tools. CONCLUSIONS: National financial sanctions appear effective in implementing guidance, where other local measures have failed. BMJ Publishing Group 2012-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3533008/ /pubmed/23135540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001668 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Basey, Avril Janette Krska, Janet Kennedy, Tom D Mackridge, Adam John Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study |
title | Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study |
title_full | Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study |
title_short | Challenges in implementing government-directed VTE guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study |
title_sort | challenges in implementing government-directed vte guidance for medical patients: a mixed methods study |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23135540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baseyavriljanette challengesinimplementinggovernmentdirectedvteguidanceformedicalpatientsamixedmethodsstudy AT krskajanet challengesinimplementinggovernmentdirectedvteguidanceformedicalpatientsamixedmethodsstudy AT kennedytomd challengesinimplementinggovernmentdirectedvteguidanceformedicalpatientsamixedmethodsstudy AT mackridgeadamjohn challengesinimplementinggovernmentdirectedvteguidanceformedicalpatientsamixedmethodsstudy |