Cargando…
Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Investigation of contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) is a priority for TB control in high-income countries, and is increasingly being considered in resource-limited settings. This review was commissioned for a World Health Organization Expert Panel to develop global contact investigation gui...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22936710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00070812 |
_version_ | 1782254428840001536 |
---|---|
author | Fox, Gregory J. Barry, Simone E. Britton, Warwick J. Marks, Guy B. |
author_facet | Fox, Gregory J. Barry, Simone E. Britton, Warwick J. Marks, Guy B. |
author_sort | Fox, Gregory J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Investigation of contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) is a priority for TB control in high-income countries, and is increasingly being considered in resource-limited settings. This review was commissioned for a World Health Organization Expert Panel to develop global contact investigation guidelines. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the prevalence of TB and latent TB infection, and the annual incidence of TB among contacts of patients with TB. After screening 9,555 titles, we included 203 published studies. In 95 studies from low- and middle-income settings, the prevalence of active TB in all contacts was 3.1% (95% CI 2.2–4.4%, I(2)=99.4%), microbiologically proven TB was 1.2% (95% CI 0.9–1.8%, I(2)=95.9%), and latent TB infection was 51.5% (95% CI 47.1–55.8%, I(2)=98.9%). The prevalence of TB among household contacts was 3.1% (95% CI 2.1–4.5%, I(2)=98.8%) and among contacts of patients with multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant TB was 3.4% (95% CI 0.8–12.6%, I(2)=95.7%). Incidence was greatest in the first year after exposure. In 108 studies from high-income settings, the prevalence of TB among contacts was 1.4% (95% CI 1.1–1.8%, I(2)=98.7%), and the prevalence of latent infection was 28.1% (95% CI 24.2–32.4%, I(2)=99.5%). There was substantial heterogeneity among published studies. Contacts of TB patients are a high-risk group for developing TB, particularly within the first year. Children <5 yrs of age and people living with HIV are particularly at risk. Policy recommendations must consider evidence of the cost-effectiveness of various contact tracing strategies, and also incorporate complementary strategies to enhance case finding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3533588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35335882013-01-07 Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fox, Gregory J. Barry, Simone E. Britton, Warwick J. Marks, Guy B. Eur Respir J Original Article Investigation of contacts of patients with tuberculosis (TB) is a priority for TB control in high-income countries, and is increasingly being considered in resource-limited settings. This review was commissioned for a World Health Organization Expert Panel to develop global contact investigation guidelines. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the prevalence of TB and latent TB infection, and the annual incidence of TB among contacts of patients with TB. After screening 9,555 titles, we included 203 published studies. In 95 studies from low- and middle-income settings, the prevalence of active TB in all contacts was 3.1% (95% CI 2.2–4.4%, I(2)=99.4%), microbiologically proven TB was 1.2% (95% CI 0.9–1.8%, I(2)=95.9%), and latent TB infection was 51.5% (95% CI 47.1–55.8%, I(2)=98.9%). The prevalence of TB among household contacts was 3.1% (95% CI 2.1–4.5%, I(2)=98.8%) and among contacts of patients with multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant TB was 3.4% (95% CI 0.8–12.6%, I(2)=95.7%). Incidence was greatest in the first year after exposure. In 108 studies from high-income settings, the prevalence of TB among contacts was 1.4% (95% CI 1.1–1.8%, I(2)=98.7%), and the prevalence of latent infection was 28.1% (95% CI 24.2–32.4%, I(2)=99.5%). There was substantial heterogeneity among published studies. Contacts of TB patients are a high-risk group for developing TB, particularly within the first year. Children <5 yrs of age and people living with HIV are particularly at risk. Policy recommendations must consider evidence of the cost-effectiveness of various contact tracing strategies, and also incorporate complementary strategies to enhance case finding. European Respiratory Society 2013-01 2012-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3533588/ /pubmed/22936710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00070812 Text en Copyright © ERS 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ ERJ Open articles are open access and distributed under the terms of the (Creative Commons Attribution Licence 3.0> (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fox, Gregory J. Barry, Simone E. Britton, Warwick J. Marks, Guy B. Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | contact investigation for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22936710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00070812 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foxgregoryj contactinvestigationfortuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT barrysimonee contactinvestigationfortuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT brittonwarwickj contactinvestigationfortuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT marksguyb contactinvestigationfortuberculosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |