Cargando…
Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Postoperative surgical site infections cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, costs and even mortality and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. Approximately 14% to 30% of all patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery are affected and methods...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-57 |
_version_ | 1782254444548718592 |
---|---|
author | Mihaljevic, André L Michalski, Christoph W Erkan, Mert Reiser-Erkan, Carolin Jäger, Carsten Schuster, Tibor Schuhmacher, Christoph Kleeff, Jörg Friess, Helmut |
author_facet | Mihaljevic, André L Michalski, Christoph W Erkan, Mert Reiser-Erkan, Carolin Jäger, Carsten Schuster, Tibor Schuhmacher, Christoph Kleeff, Jörg Friess, Helmut |
author_sort | Mihaljevic, André L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative surgical site infections cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, costs and even mortality and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. Approximately 14% to 30% of all patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery are affected and methods to reduce surgical site infection rates warrant further investigation and evaluation in randomized controlled trials. METHODS/DESIGN: To investigate whether the application of a circular plastic wound protector reduces the rate of surgical site infections in general and visceral surgical patients that undergo midline or transverse laparotomy by 50%. BaFO is a randomized, controlled, patient-blinded and observer-blinded multicenter clinical trial with two parallel surgical groups. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of surgical site infections within 45 days postoperative assessed according to the definition of the Center for Disease Control. Statistical analysis of the primary endpoint will be based on the intention-to-treat population. The global level of significance is set at 5% (2 sided) and sample size (n = 258 per group) is determined to assure a power of 80% with a planned interim analysis for the primary endpoint after the inclusion of 340 patients. DISCUSSION: The BaFO trial will explore if the rate of surgical site infections can be reduced by a single, simple, inexpensive intervention in patients undergoing open elective abdominal surgery. Its pragmatic design guarantees high external validity and clinical relevance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01181206. Date of registration: 11 August 2010; date of first patient randomized: 8 September 2010 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3533734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35337342013-01-03 Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Mihaljevic, André L Michalski, Christoph W Erkan, Mert Reiser-Erkan, Carolin Jäger, Carsten Schuster, Tibor Schuhmacher, Christoph Kleeff, Jörg Friess, Helmut Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Postoperative surgical site infections cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, costs and even mortality and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. Approximately 14% to 30% of all patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery are affected and methods to reduce surgical site infection rates warrant further investigation and evaluation in randomized controlled trials. METHODS/DESIGN: To investigate whether the application of a circular plastic wound protector reduces the rate of surgical site infections in general and visceral surgical patients that undergo midline or transverse laparotomy by 50%. BaFO is a randomized, controlled, patient-blinded and observer-blinded multicenter clinical trial with two parallel surgical groups. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of surgical site infections within 45 days postoperative assessed according to the definition of the Center for Disease Control. Statistical analysis of the primary endpoint will be based on the intention-to-treat population. The global level of significance is set at 5% (2 sided) and sample size (n = 258 per group) is determined to assure a power of 80% with a planned interim analysis for the primary endpoint after the inclusion of 340 patients. DISCUSSION: The BaFO trial will explore if the rate of surgical site infections can be reduced by a single, simple, inexpensive intervention in patients undergoing open elective abdominal surgery. Its pragmatic design guarantees high external validity and clinical relevance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01181206. Date of registration: 11 August 2010; date of first patient randomized: 8 September 2010 BioMed Central 2012-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3533734/ /pubmed/22587425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-57 Text en Copyright ©2012 Mihaljevic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Mihaljevic, André L Michalski, Christoph W Erkan, Mert Reiser-Erkan, Carolin Jäger, Carsten Schuster, Tibor Schuhmacher, Christoph Kleeff, Jörg Friess, Helmut Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (bafo): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-57 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mihaljevicandrel standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT michalskichristophw standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT erkanmert standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT reisererkancarolin standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jagercarsten standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schustertibor standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schuhmacherchristoph standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kleeffjorg standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT friesshelmut standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |