Cargando…

Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Postoperative surgical site infections cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, costs and even mortality and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. Approximately 14% to 30% of all patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery are affected and methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mihaljevic, André L, Michalski, Christoph W, Erkan, Mert, Reiser-Erkan, Carolin, Jäger, Carsten, Schuster, Tibor, Schuhmacher, Christoph, Kleeff, Jörg, Friess, Helmut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-57
_version_ 1782254444548718592
author Mihaljevic, André L
Michalski, Christoph W
Erkan, Mert
Reiser-Erkan, Carolin
Jäger, Carsten
Schuster, Tibor
Schuhmacher, Christoph
Kleeff, Jörg
Friess, Helmut
author_facet Mihaljevic, André L
Michalski, Christoph W
Erkan, Mert
Reiser-Erkan, Carolin
Jäger, Carsten
Schuster, Tibor
Schuhmacher, Christoph
Kleeff, Jörg
Friess, Helmut
author_sort Mihaljevic, André L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative surgical site infections cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, costs and even mortality and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. Approximately 14% to 30% of all patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery are affected and methods to reduce surgical site infection rates warrant further investigation and evaluation in randomized controlled trials. METHODS/DESIGN: To investigate whether the application of a circular plastic wound protector reduces the rate of surgical site infections in general and visceral surgical patients that undergo midline or transverse laparotomy by 50%. BaFO is a randomized, controlled, patient-blinded and observer-blinded multicenter clinical trial with two parallel surgical groups. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of surgical site infections within 45 days postoperative assessed according to the definition of the Center for Disease Control. Statistical analysis of the primary endpoint will be based on the intention-to-treat population. The global level of significance is set at 5% (2 sided) and sample size (n = 258 per group) is determined to assure a power of 80% with a planned interim analysis for the primary endpoint after the inclusion of 340 patients. DISCUSSION: The BaFO trial will explore if the rate of surgical site infections can be reduced by a single, simple, inexpensive intervention in patients undergoing open elective abdominal surgery. Its pragmatic design guarantees high external validity and clinical relevance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01181206. Date of registration: 11 August 2010; date of first patient randomized: 8 September 2010
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3533734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35337342013-01-03 Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Mihaljevic, André L Michalski, Christoph W Erkan, Mert Reiser-Erkan, Carolin Jäger, Carsten Schuster, Tibor Schuhmacher, Christoph Kleeff, Jörg Friess, Helmut Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Postoperative surgical site infections cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, costs and even mortality and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. Approximately 14% to 30% of all patients undergoing elective open abdominal surgery are affected and methods to reduce surgical site infection rates warrant further investigation and evaluation in randomized controlled trials. METHODS/DESIGN: To investigate whether the application of a circular plastic wound protector reduces the rate of surgical site infections in general and visceral surgical patients that undergo midline or transverse laparotomy by 50%. BaFO is a randomized, controlled, patient-blinded and observer-blinded multicenter clinical trial with two parallel surgical groups. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of surgical site infections within 45 days postoperative assessed according to the definition of the Center for Disease Control. Statistical analysis of the primary endpoint will be based on the intention-to-treat population. The global level of significance is set at 5% (2 sided) and sample size (n = 258 per group) is determined to assure a power of 80% with a planned interim analysis for the primary endpoint after the inclusion of 340 patients. DISCUSSION: The BaFO trial will explore if the rate of surgical site infections can be reduced by a single, simple, inexpensive intervention in patients undergoing open elective abdominal surgery. Its pragmatic design guarantees high external validity and clinical relevance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01181206. Date of registration: 11 August 2010; date of first patient randomized: 8 September 2010 BioMed Central 2012-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3533734/ /pubmed/22587425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-57 Text en Copyright ©2012 Mihaljevic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Mihaljevic, André L
Michalski, Christoph W
Erkan, Mert
Reiser-Erkan, Carolin
Jäger, Carsten
Schuster, Tibor
Schuhmacher, Christoph
Kleeff, Jörg
Friess, Helmut
Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (BaFO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings vs coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections (bafo): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-57
work_keys_str_mv AT mihaljevicandrel standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT michalskichristophw standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT erkanmert standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reisererkancarolin standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jagercarsten standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schustertibor standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schuhmacherchristoph standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kleeffjorg standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT friesshelmut standardabdominalwoundedgeprotectionwithsurgicaldressingsvscoveragewithasterilecircularpolyethylenedrapeforpreventionofsurgicalsiteinfectionsbafostudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial