Cargando…
Detection and correction of probe-level artefacts on microarrays
BACKGROUND: A recent large-scale analysis of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data found frequent evidence for spatial defects in a substantial fraction of Affymetrix microarrays in the GEO. Nevertheless, in contrast to quality assessment, artefact detection is not widely used in standard gene expressi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3534149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-114 |
_version_ | 1782475282296340480 |
---|---|
author | Petri, Tobias Berchtold, Evi Zimmer, Ralf Friedel, Caroline C |
author_facet | Petri, Tobias Berchtold, Evi Zimmer, Ralf Friedel, Caroline C |
author_sort | Petri, Tobias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A recent large-scale analysis of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data found frequent evidence for spatial defects in a substantial fraction of Affymetrix microarrays in the GEO. Nevertheless, in contrast to quality assessment, artefact detection is not widely used in standard gene expression analysis pipelines. Furthermore, although approaches have been proposed to detect diverse types of spatial noise on arrays, the correction of these artefacts is mostly left to either summarization methods or the corresponding arrays are completely discarded. RESULTS: We show that state-of-the-art robust summarization procedures are vulnerable to artefacts on arrays and cannot appropriately correct for these. To address this problem, we present a simple approach to detect artefacts with high recall and precision, which we further improve by taking into account the spatial layout of arrays. Finally, we propose two correction methods for these artefacts that either substitute values of defective probes using probeset information or filter corrupted probes. We show that our approach can identify and correct defective probe measurements appropriately and outperforms existing tools. CONCLUSIONS: While summarization is insufficient to correct for defective probes, this problem can be addressed in a straightforward way by the methods we present for identification and correction of defective probes. As these methods output CEL files with corrected probe values that serve as input to standard normalization and summarization procedures, they can be easily integrated into existing microarray analysis pipelines as an additional pre-processing step. An R package is freely available from http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/artefact-correction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3534149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35341492013-01-07 Detection and correction of probe-level artefacts on microarrays Petri, Tobias Berchtold, Evi Zimmer, Ralf Friedel, Caroline C BMC Bioinformatics Research Article BACKGROUND: A recent large-scale analysis of Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data found frequent evidence for spatial defects in a substantial fraction of Affymetrix microarrays in the GEO. Nevertheless, in contrast to quality assessment, artefact detection is not widely used in standard gene expression analysis pipelines. Furthermore, although approaches have been proposed to detect diverse types of spatial noise on arrays, the correction of these artefacts is mostly left to either summarization methods or the corresponding arrays are completely discarded. RESULTS: We show that state-of-the-art robust summarization procedures are vulnerable to artefacts on arrays and cannot appropriately correct for these. To address this problem, we present a simple approach to detect artefacts with high recall and precision, which we further improve by taking into account the spatial layout of arrays. Finally, we propose two correction methods for these artefacts that either substitute values of defective probes using probeset information or filter corrupted probes. We show that our approach can identify and correct defective probe measurements appropriately and outperforms existing tools. CONCLUSIONS: While summarization is insufficient to correct for defective probes, this problem can be addressed in a straightforward way by the methods we present for identification and correction of defective probes. As these methods output CEL files with corrected probe values that serve as input to standard normalization and summarization procedures, they can be easily integrated into existing microarray analysis pipelines as an additional pre-processing step. An R package is freely available from http://www.bio.ifi.lmu.de/artefact-correction. BioMed Central 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3534149/ /pubmed/22647057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-114 Text en Copyright ©2012 Petri et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Petri, Tobias Berchtold, Evi Zimmer, Ralf Friedel, Caroline C Detection and correction of probe-level artefacts on microarrays |
title | Detection and correction of probe-level artefacts on microarrays |
title_full | Detection and correction of probe-level artefacts on microarrays |
title_fullStr | Detection and correction of probe-level artefacts on microarrays |
title_full_unstemmed | Detection and correction of probe-level artefacts on microarrays |
title_short | Detection and correction of probe-level artefacts on microarrays |
title_sort | detection and correction of probe-level artefacts on microarrays |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3534149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petritobias detectionandcorrectionofprobelevelartefactsonmicroarrays AT berchtoldevi detectionandcorrectionofprobelevelartefactsonmicroarrays AT zimmerralf detectionandcorrectionofprobelevelartefactsonmicroarrays AT friedelcarolinec detectionandcorrectionofprobelevelartefactsonmicroarrays |