Cargando…
Approach to dose definition to the gross tumor volume for lung cancer with respiratory tumor motion
The purpose of this study was to validate the dose prescription defined to the gross tumor volume (GTV) 3D and 4D dose distributions of stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer. Treatment plans for 94 patients were generated based on computed tomography (CT) under free breathing. A uniform margin o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3534263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22951318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs054 |
_version_ | 1782475303517421568 |
---|---|
author | Miura, Hideharu Masai, Norihisa Oh, Ryoong-Jin Shiomi, Hiroya Sasaki, Junichi Inoue, Toshihiko |
author_facet | Miura, Hideharu Masai, Norihisa Oh, Ryoong-Jin Shiomi, Hiroya Sasaki, Junichi Inoue, Toshihiko |
author_sort | Miura, Hideharu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to validate the dose prescription defined to the gross tumor volume (GTV) 3D and 4D dose distributions of stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer. Treatment plans for 94 patients were generated based on computed tomography (CT) under free breathing. A uniform margin of 8 mm was added to the internal target volume (ITV) to generate the planning target volume (PTV). A leaf margin of 2 mm was added to the PTV. The prescription dose was defined such that 99% of the GTV should receive 100% of the dose using the Monte Carlo calculation (iPlan RT Dose(TM)) for 6-MV photon beams. The 3D dose distribution was determined using CT under free breathing. The 4D dose distribution plan was recalculated to investigate the effect of tumor motion using the same monitor units as those used for the 3D dose distribution plan. D99 (99% of the GTV) in the 4D plan was defined as the average D99 in each of the four breathing phases (0%, 25%, 50% and 75%). The dose difference between maximum and minimum at D99 of the GTV in 4D calculations was 0.6 ± 1.0% (range 0.2–4.6%). The average D99 of the GTV from 4D calculations in most patients was almost 100% (99.8 ± 1.0%). No significant difference was found in dose to the GTV between 3D and 4D dose calculations (P = 0.67). This study supports the clinical acceptability of treatment planning based on the dose prescription defined to the GTV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3534263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35342632013-01-03 Approach to dose definition to the gross tumor volume for lung cancer with respiratory tumor motion Miura, Hideharu Masai, Norihisa Oh, Ryoong-Jin Shiomi, Hiroya Sasaki, Junichi Inoue, Toshihiko J Radiat Res Technology The purpose of this study was to validate the dose prescription defined to the gross tumor volume (GTV) 3D and 4D dose distributions of stereotactic radiotherapy for lung cancer. Treatment plans for 94 patients were generated based on computed tomography (CT) under free breathing. A uniform margin of 8 mm was added to the internal target volume (ITV) to generate the planning target volume (PTV). A leaf margin of 2 mm was added to the PTV. The prescription dose was defined such that 99% of the GTV should receive 100% of the dose using the Monte Carlo calculation (iPlan RT Dose(TM)) for 6-MV photon beams. The 3D dose distribution was determined using CT under free breathing. The 4D dose distribution plan was recalculated to investigate the effect of tumor motion using the same monitor units as those used for the 3D dose distribution plan. D99 (99% of the GTV) in the 4D plan was defined as the average D99 in each of the four breathing phases (0%, 25%, 50% and 75%). The dose difference between maximum and minimum at D99 of the GTV in 4D calculations was 0.6 ± 1.0% (range 0.2–4.6%). The average D99 of the GTV from 4D calculations in most patients was almost 100% (99.8 ± 1.0%). No significant difference was found in dose to the GTV between 3D and 4D dose calculations (P = 0.67). This study supports the clinical acceptability of treatment planning based on the dose prescription defined to the GTV. Oxford University Press 2013-01 2012-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3534263/ /pubmed/22951318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs054 Text en © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technology Miura, Hideharu Masai, Norihisa Oh, Ryoong-Jin Shiomi, Hiroya Sasaki, Junichi Inoue, Toshihiko Approach to dose definition to the gross tumor volume for lung cancer with respiratory tumor motion |
title | Approach to dose definition to the gross tumor volume for lung cancer with respiratory tumor motion |
title_full | Approach to dose definition to the gross tumor volume for lung cancer with respiratory tumor motion |
title_fullStr | Approach to dose definition to the gross tumor volume for lung cancer with respiratory tumor motion |
title_full_unstemmed | Approach to dose definition to the gross tumor volume for lung cancer with respiratory tumor motion |
title_short | Approach to dose definition to the gross tumor volume for lung cancer with respiratory tumor motion |
title_sort | approach to dose definition to the gross tumor volume for lung cancer with respiratory tumor motion |
topic | Technology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3534263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22951318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrs054 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miurahideharu approachtodosedefinitiontothegrosstumorvolumeforlungcancerwithrespiratorytumormotion AT masainorihisa approachtodosedefinitiontothegrosstumorvolumeforlungcancerwithrespiratorytumormotion AT ohryoongjin approachtodosedefinitiontothegrosstumorvolumeforlungcancerwithrespiratorytumormotion AT shiomihiroya approachtodosedefinitiontothegrosstumorvolumeforlungcancerwithrespiratorytumormotion AT sasakijunichi approachtodosedefinitiontothegrosstumorvolumeforlungcancerwithrespiratorytumormotion AT inouetoshihiko approachtodosedefinitiontothegrosstumorvolumeforlungcancerwithrespiratorytumormotion |