Cargando…

Starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: The widespread of hallux valgus surgery in a day care setting enhanced the role of regional anaesthesia in the last few years. Sciatic nerve block at popliteal fossa has been shown to provide safe and effective analgesia. Our purpose was to compare the success rate and performance time o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cataldo, Rita, Carassiti, Massimiliano, Costa, Fabio, Martuscelli, Matteo, Benedetto, Maria, Cancilleri, Francesco, Marinozzi, Andrea, Martinelli, Nicolò
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3534337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23253617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-33
_version_ 1782475317563097088
author Cataldo, Rita
Carassiti, Massimiliano
Costa, Fabio
Martuscelli, Matteo
Benedetto, Maria
Cancilleri, Francesco
Marinozzi, Andrea
Martinelli, Nicolò
author_facet Cataldo, Rita
Carassiti, Massimiliano
Costa, Fabio
Martuscelli, Matteo
Benedetto, Maria
Cancilleri, Francesco
Marinozzi, Andrea
Martinelli, Nicolò
author_sort Cataldo, Rita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The widespread of hallux valgus surgery in a day care setting enhanced the role of regional anaesthesia in the last few years. Sciatic nerve block at popliteal fossa has been shown to provide safe and effective analgesia. Our purpose was to compare the success rate and performance time of popliteal block during resident’s training for regional anaesthesia by using nerve stimulation (NS) or combined nerve stimulation and ultrasound (NS + US). METHODS: 70 adult patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery were randomly assigned to receive sciatic nerve block at popliteal fossa with US+NS or NS alone with a double injection technique for peroneal and tibial branches, respectively. Two residents experienced with nerve stimulator performed the procedures after a learning phase concerning ultrasonography. A local anaesthetic solution, containing 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine and 10 mL of 2% lidocaine was used: 12 mL were infiltrated close the tibial nerve, and 8mL were infiltrated close the common peroneal nerve. Block success rate, sensory block onset time, block performance time were evaluated. Recourse to general anaesthesia was considered as failure. RESULTS: No differences were detected in success rate and onset time of sensory block between the two groups (P > 0.05). The time to block tibial nerve and the overall block time were significantly faster in US+NS group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance for popliteal nerve block resulted in similar success rate with a faster procedure time when compared with nerve stimulator, thus providing a possible effect on resident education and operating room efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3534337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35343372013-01-03 Starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study Cataldo, Rita Carassiti, Massimiliano Costa, Fabio Martuscelli, Matteo Benedetto, Maria Cancilleri, Francesco Marinozzi, Andrea Martinelli, Nicolò BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The widespread of hallux valgus surgery in a day care setting enhanced the role of regional anaesthesia in the last few years. Sciatic nerve block at popliteal fossa has been shown to provide safe and effective analgesia. Our purpose was to compare the success rate and performance time of popliteal block during resident’s training for regional anaesthesia by using nerve stimulation (NS) or combined nerve stimulation and ultrasound (NS + US). METHODS: 70 adult patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery were randomly assigned to receive sciatic nerve block at popliteal fossa with US+NS or NS alone with a double injection technique for peroneal and tibial branches, respectively. Two residents experienced with nerve stimulator performed the procedures after a learning phase concerning ultrasonography. A local anaesthetic solution, containing 10 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine and 10 mL of 2% lidocaine was used: 12 mL were infiltrated close the tibial nerve, and 8mL were infiltrated close the common peroneal nerve. Block success rate, sensory block onset time, block performance time were evaluated. Recourse to general anaesthesia was considered as failure. RESULTS: No differences were detected in success rate and onset time of sensory block between the two groups (P > 0.05). The time to block tibial nerve and the overall block time were significantly faster in US+NS group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance for popliteal nerve block resulted in similar success rate with a faster procedure time when compared with nerve stimulator, thus providing a possible effect on resident education and operating room efficiency. BioMed Central 2012-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3534337/ /pubmed/23253617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-33 Text en Copyright ©2012 Cataldo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cataldo, Rita
Carassiti, Massimiliano
Costa, Fabio
Martuscelli, Matteo
Benedetto, Maria
Cancilleri, Francesco
Marinozzi, Andrea
Martinelli, Nicolò
Starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study
title Starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study
title_full Starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study
title_short Starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study
title_sort starting with ultrasonography decreases popliteal block performance time in inexperienced hands: a prospective randomized study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3534337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23253617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-12-33
work_keys_str_mv AT cataldorita startingwithultrasonographydecreasespoplitealblockperformancetimeininexperiencedhandsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT carassitimassimiliano startingwithultrasonographydecreasespoplitealblockperformancetimeininexperiencedhandsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT costafabio startingwithultrasonographydecreasespoplitealblockperformancetimeininexperiencedhandsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT martuscellimatteo startingwithultrasonographydecreasespoplitealblockperformancetimeininexperiencedhandsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT benedettomaria startingwithultrasonographydecreasespoplitealblockperformancetimeininexperiencedhandsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT cancillerifrancesco startingwithultrasonographydecreasespoplitealblockperformancetimeininexperiencedhandsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT marinozziandrea startingwithultrasonographydecreasespoplitealblockperformancetimeininexperiencedhandsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT martinellinicolo startingwithultrasonographydecreasespoplitealblockperformancetimeininexperiencedhandsaprospectiverandomizedstudy