Cargando…

Predictors of Radiotherapy Induced Bone Injury (RIBI) after stereotactic lung radiotherapy

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and dosimetric factors associated with radiotherapy induced bone injury (RIBI) following stereotactic lung radiotherapy. METHODS: Inoperable patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, treated with SBRT, who received 54 or 60 G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taremi, Mojgan, Hope, Andrew, Lindsay, Patricia, Dahele, Max, Fung, Sharon, Purdie, Thomas G, Jaffray, David, Dawson, Laura, Bezjak, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3534507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22985910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-159
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and dosimetric factors associated with radiotherapy induced bone injury (RIBI) following stereotactic lung radiotherapy. METHODS: Inoperable patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer, treated with SBRT, who received 54 or 60 Gy in 3 fractions, and had a minimum of 6 months follow up were reviewed. Archived treatment plans were retrieved, ribs delineated individually and treatment plans re-computed using heterogeneity correction. Clinical and dosimetric factors were evaluated for their association with rib fracture using logistic regression analysis; a dose-event curve and nomogram were created. RESULTS: 46 consecutive patients treated between Oct 2004 and Dec 2008 with median follow-up 25 months (m) (range 6 – 51 m) were eligible. 41 fractured ribs were detected in 17 patients; median time to fracture was 21 m (range 7 – 40 m). The mean maximum point dose in non-fractured ribs (n = 1054) was 10.5 Gy ± 10.2 Gy, this was higher in fractured ribs (n = 41) 48.5 Gy ± 24.3 Gy (p < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, age, dose to 0.5 cc of the ribs (D(0.5)), and the volume of the rib receiving at least 25 Gy (V(25)), were significantly associated with RIBI. As D(0.5) and V(25) were cross-correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.57, p < 0.001), we selected D(0.5) as a representative dose parameter. On multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio: 1.121, 95% CI: 1.04 – 1.21, p = 0.003), female gender (odds ratio: 4.43, 95% CI: 1.68 – 11.68, p = 0.003), and rib D(0.5) (odds ratio: 1.0009, 95% CI: 1.0007 – 1.001, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with rib fracture. Using D(0.5,) a dose-event curve was constructed estimating risk of fracture from dose at the median follow up of 25 months after treatment. In our cohort, a 50% risk of rib fracture was associated with a D(0.5) of 60 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric and clinical factors contribute to risk of RIBI and both should be included when modeling risk of toxicity. A nomogram is presented using D(0.5), age, and female gender to estimate risk of RIBI following SBRT. This requires validation.