Cargando…
An evaluation of impacts in “Nanoscience & nanotechnology”: steps towards standards for citation analysis
One is inclined to conceptualize impact in terms of citations per publication, and thus as an average. However, citation distributions are skewed, and the average has the disadvantage that the number of publications is used in the denominator. Using hundred percentiles, one can integrate the normali...
Autor principal: | Leydesdorff, Loet |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23293403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0750-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Nanoscience: Nanotechnologies and Nanophysics
por: Dupas, Claire, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
Textbook of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
por: Murty, B S, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Introduction to nanoscience and nanotechnology
por: Binns, Chris
Publicado: (2010) -
Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”!
por: Bornmann, Lutz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Relative Influences of Government Funding and International Collaboration on Citation Impact
por: Leydesdorff, Loet, et al.
Publicado: (2018)