Cargando…

Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach

Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) and many forms of reproductive toxicity (RT) often manifest themselves in functional deficits that are not necessarily based on cell death, but rather on minor changes relating to cell differentiation or communication. The fields of DNT/RT would greatly benefit from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krug, Anne K., Kolde, Raivo, Gaspar, John A., Rempel, Eugen, Balmer, Nina V., Meganathan, Kesavan, Vojnits, Kinga, Baquié, Mathurin, Waldmann, Tanja, Ensenat-Waser, Roberto, Jagtap, Smita, Evans, Richard M., Julien, Stephanie, Peterson, Hedi, Zagoura, Dimitra, Kadereit, Suzanne, Gerhard, Daniel, Sotiriadou, Isaia, Heke, Michael, Natarajan, Karthick, Henry, Margit, Winkler, Johannes, Marchan, Rosemarie, Stoppini, Luc, Bosgra, Sieto, Westerhout, Joost, Verwei, Miriam, Vilo, Jaak, Kortenkamp, Andreas, Hescheler, Jürgen, Hothorn, Ludwig, Bremer, Susanne, van Thriel, Christoph, Krause, Karl-Heinz, Hengstler, Jan G., Rahnenführer, Jörg, Leist, Marcel, Sachinidis, Agapios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23179753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0967-3
_version_ 1782254687769067520
author Krug, Anne K.
Kolde, Raivo
Gaspar, John A.
Rempel, Eugen
Balmer, Nina V.
Meganathan, Kesavan
Vojnits, Kinga
Baquié, Mathurin
Waldmann, Tanja
Ensenat-Waser, Roberto
Jagtap, Smita
Evans, Richard M.
Julien, Stephanie
Peterson, Hedi
Zagoura, Dimitra
Kadereit, Suzanne
Gerhard, Daniel
Sotiriadou, Isaia
Heke, Michael
Natarajan, Karthick
Henry, Margit
Winkler, Johannes
Marchan, Rosemarie
Stoppini, Luc
Bosgra, Sieto
Westerhout, Joost
Verwei, Miriam
Vilo, Jaak
Kortenkamp, Andreas
Hescheler, Jürgen
Hothorn, Ludwig
Bremer, Susanne
van Thriel, Christoph
Krause, Karl-Heinz
Hengstler, Jan G.
Rahnenführer, Jörg
Leist, Marcel
Sachinidis, Agapios
author_facet Krug, Anne K.
Kolde, Raivo
Gaspar, John A.
Rempel, Eugen
Balmer, Nina V.
Meganathan, Kesavan
Vojnits, Kinga
Baquié, Mathurin
Waldmann, Tanja
Ensenat-Waser, Roberto
Jagtap, Smita
Evans, Richard M.
Julien, Stephanie
Peterson, Hedi
Zagoura, Dimitra
Kadereit, Suzanne
Gerhard, Daniel
Sotiriadou, Isaia
Heke, Michael
Natarajan, Karthick
Henry, Margit
Winkler, Johannes
Marchan, Rosemarie
Stoppini, Luc
Bosgra, Sieto
Westerhout, Joost
Verwei, Miriam
Vilo, Jaak
Kortenkamp, Andreas
Hescheler, Jürgen
Hothorn, Ludwig
Bremer, Susanne
van Thriel, Christoph
Krause, Karl-Heinz
Hengstler, Jan G.
Rahnenführer, Jörg
Leist, Marcel
Sachinidis, Agapios
author_sort Krug, Anne K.
collection PubMed
description Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) and many forms of reproductive toxicity (RT) often manifest themselves in functional deficits that are not necessarily based on cell death, but rather on minor changes relating to cell differentiation or communication. The fields of DNT/RT would greatly benefit from in vitro tests that allow the identification of toxicant-induced changes of the cellular proteostasis, or of its underlying transcriptome network. Therefore, the ‘human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived novel alternative test systems (ESNATS)’ European commission research project established RT tests based on defined differentiation protocols of hESC and their progeny. Valproic acid (VPA) and methylmercury (MeHg) were used as positive control compounds to address the following fundamental questions: (1) Does transcriptome analysis allow discrimination of the two compounds? (2) How does analysis of enriched transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) and of individual probe sets (PS) distinguish between test systems? (3) Can batch effects be controlled? (4) How many DNA microarrays are needed? (5) Is the highest non-cytotoxic concentration optimal and relevant for the study of transcriptome changes? VPA triggered vast transcriptional changes, whereas MeHg altered fewer transcripts. To attenuate batch effects, analysis has been focused on the 500 PS with highest variability. The test systems differed significantly in their responses (<20 % overlap). Moreover, within one test system, little overlap between the PS changed by the two compounds has been observed. However, using TFBS enrichment, a relatively large ‘common response’ to VPA and MeHg could be distinguished from ‘compound-specific’ responses. In conclusion, the ESNATS assay battery allows classification of human DNT/RT toxicants on the basis of their transcriptome profiles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-012-0967-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3535399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35353992013-01-04 Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach Krug, Anne K. Kolde, Raivo Gaspar, John A. Rempel, Eugen Balmer, Nina V. Meganathan, Kesavan Vojnits, Kinga Baquié, Mathurin Waldmann, Tanja Ensenat-Waser, Roberto Jagtap, Smita Evans, Richard M. Julien, Stephanie Peterson, Hedi Zagoura, Dimitra Kadereit, Suzanne Gerhard, Daniel Sotiriadou, Isaia Heke, Michael Natarajan, Karthick Henry, Margit Winkler, Johannes Marchan, Rosemarie Stoppini, Luc Bosgra, Sieto Westerhout, Joost Verwei, Miriam Vilo, Jaak Kortenkamp, Andreas Hescheler, Jürgen Hothorn, Ludwig Bremer, Susanne van Thriel, Christoph Krause, Karl-Heinz Hengstler, Jan G. Rahnenführer, Jörg Leist, Marcel Sachinidis, Agapios Arch Toxicol Toxicogenomics Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) and many forms of reproductive toxicity (RT) often manifest themselves in functional deficits that are not necessarily based on cell death, but rather on minor changes relating to cell differentiation or communication. The fields of DNT/RT would greatly benefit from in vitro tests that allow the identification of toxicant-induced changes of the cellular proteostasis, or of its underlying transcriptome network. Therefore, the ‘human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived novel alternative test systems (ESNATS)’ European commission research project established RT tests based on defined differentiation protocols of hESC and their progeny. Valproic acid (VPA) and methylmercury (MeHg) were used as positive control compounds to address the following fundamental questions: (1) Does transcriptome analysis allow discrimination of the two compounds? (2) How does analysis of enriched transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) and of individual probe sets (PS) distinguish between test systems? (3) Can batch effects be controlled? (4) How many DNA microarrays are needed? (5) Is the highest non-cytotoxic concentration optimal and relevant for the study of transcriptome changes? VPA triggered vast transcriptional changes, whereas MeHg altered fewer transcripts. To attenuate batch effects, analysis has been focused on the 500 PS with highest variability. The test systems differed significantly in their responses (<20 % overlap). Moreover, within one test system, little overlap between the PS changed by the two compounds has been observed. However, using TFBS enrichment, a relatively large ‘common response’ to VPA and MeHg could be distinguished from ‘compound-specific’ responses. In conclusion, the ESNATS assay battery allows classification of human DNT/RT toxicants on the basis of their transcriptome profiles. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-012-0967-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2012-11-21 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3535399/ /pubmed/23179753 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0967-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Toxicogenomics
Krug, Anne K.
Kolde, Raivo
Gaspar, John A.
Rempel, Eugen
Balmer, Nina V.
Meganathan, Kesavan
Vojnits, Kinga
Baquié, Mathurin
Waldmann, Tanja
Ensenat-Waser, Roberto
Jagtap, Smita
Evans, Richard M.
Julien, Stephanie
Peterson, Hedi
Zagoura, Dimitra
Kadereit, Suzanne
Gerhard, Daniel
Sotiriadou, Isaia
Heke, Michael
Natarajan, Karthick
Henry, Margit
Winkler, Johannes
Marchan, Rosemarie
Stoppini, Luc
Bosgra, Sieto
Westerhout, Joost
Verwei, Miriam
Vilo, Jaak
Kortenkamp, Andreas
Hescheler, Jürgen
Hothorn, Ludwig
Bremer, Susanne
van Thriel, Christoph
Krause, Karl-Heinz
Hengstler, Jan G.
Rahnenführer, Jörg
Leist, Marcel
Sachinidis, Agapios
Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach
title Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach
title_full Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach
title_fullStr Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach
title_full_unstemmed Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach
title_short Human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach
title_sort human embryonic stem cell-derived test systems for developmental neurotoxicity: a transcriptomics approach
topic Toxicogenomics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23179753
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0967-3
work_keys_str_mv AT krugannek humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT kolderaivo humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT gasparjohna humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT rempeleugen humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT balmerninav humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT meganathankesavan humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT vojnitskinga humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT baquiemathurin humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT waldmanntanja humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT ensenatwaserroberto humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT jagtapsmita humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT evansrichardm humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT julienstephanie humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT petersonhedi humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT zagouradimitra humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT kadereitsuzanne humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT gerharddaniel humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT sotiriadouisaia humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT hekemichael humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT natarajankarthick humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT henrymargit humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT winklerjohannes humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT marchanrosemarie humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT stoppiniluc humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT bosgrasieto humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT westerhoutjoost humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT verweimiriam humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT vilojaak humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT kortenkampandreas humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT heschelerjurgen humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT hothornludwig humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT bremersusanne humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT vanthrielchristoph humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT krausekarlheinz humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT hengstlerjang humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT rahnenfuhrerjorg humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT leistmarcel humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach
AT sachinidisagapios humanembryonicstemcellderivedtestsystemsfordevelopmentalneurotoxicityatranscriptomicsapproach