Cargando…

Cost Assessment of Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Specially designed surgical instruments have been developed for single-incision laparoscopic surgery, but high instrument costs may impede the implementation of these procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the cost of operative implements used for elective cholec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henriksen, Nadia A., Al-Tayar, Haytham, Rosenberg, Jacob, Jorgensen, Lars Nannestad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318059
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13427982377021
_version_ 1782254716236857344
author Henriksen, Nadia A.
Al-Tayar, Haytham
Rosenberg, Jacob
Jorgensen, Lars Nannestad
author_facet Henriksen, Nadia A.
Al-Tayar, Haytham
Rosenberg, Jacob
Jorgensen, Lars Nannestad
author_sort Henriksen, Nadia A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Specially designed surgical instruments have been developed for single-incision laparoscopic surgery, but high instrument costs may impede the implementation of these procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the cost of operative implements used for elective cholecystectomy performed as conventional laparoscopic 4-port cholecystectomy or as single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Two consecutive series of patients undergoing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assessed: (1) single-incision cholecystectomy using a commercially available multichannel port (n=80) and (2) a modified single-incision cholecystectomy using 2 regular trocars inserted through the umbilicus (n=20) with transabdominal sutures for gallbladder mobilization (puppeteering technique). Patients who underwent conventional 4-port cholecystectomy during the same time period (n=100) were selected as controls. RESULTS: The instrumental cost of the single-incision cholecystectomy using a commercial port was significantly higher (median, $1123) than the cost for conventional 4-port (median $441, P < .0005) and modified single-incision cholecystectomy (median $342, P < .0005). The cost of the modified single-incision procedure was significantly lower than that for the 4-port cholecystectomy (P < .0005). CONCLUSION: The modified single-incision procedure using 2 regular ports inserted through the umbilicus can be performed at lower cost than conventional 4-port cholecystectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3535802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35358022013-01-08 Cost Assessment of Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Henriksen, Nadia A. Al-Tayar, Haytham Rosenberg, Jacob Jorgensen, Lars Nannestad JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Specially designed surgical instruments have been developed for single-incision laparoscopic surgery, but high instrument costs may impede the implementation of these procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the cost of operative implements used for elective cholecystectomy performed as conventional laparoscopic 4-port cholecystectomy or as single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: Two consecutive series of patients undergoing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assessed: (1) single-incision cholecystectomy using a commercially available multichannel port (n=80) and (2) a modified single-incision cholecystectomy using 2 regular trocars inserted through the umbilicus (n=20) with transabdominal sutures for gallbladder mobilization (puppeteering technique). Patients who underwent conventional 4-port cholecystectomy during the same time period (n=100) were selected as controls. RESULTS: The instrumental cost of the single-incision cholecystectomy using a commercial port was significantly higher (median, $1123) than the cost for conventional 4-port (median $441, P < .0005) and modified single-incision cholecystectomy (median $342, P < .0005). The cost of the modified single-incision procedure was significantly lower than that for the 4-port cholecystectomy (P < .0005). CONCLUSION: The modified single-incision procedure using 2 regular ports inserted through the umbilicus can be performed at lower cost than conventional 4-port cholecystectomy. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3535802/ /pubmed/23318059 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13427982377021 Text en © 2012 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Henriksen, Nadia A.
Al-Tayar, Haytham
Rosenberg, Jacob
Jorgensen, Lars Nannestad
Cost Assessment of Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title Cost Assessment of Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full Cost Assessment of Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Cost Assessment of Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Cost Assessment of Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_short Cost Assessment of Instruments for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_sort cost assessment of instruments for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3535802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318059
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13427982377021
work_keys_str_mv AT henriksennadiaa costassessmentofinstrumentsforsingleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT altayarhaytham costassessmentofinstrumentsforsingleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT rosenbergjacob costassessmentofinstrumentsforsingleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT jorgensenlarsnannestad costassessmentofinstrumentsforsingleincisionlaparoscopiccholecystectomy