Cargando…

A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA

BACKGROUND: Studying DNA methylation profiles in detail should be the first step in epigenetic research. Although sodium bisulfite modification of genomic DNA is the gold standard method for DNA methylation analysis, this method results in the loss of the majority of the DNA material. Whole genome a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bundo, Miki, Sunaga, Fumiko, Ueda, Junko, Kasai, Kiyoto, Kato, Tadafumi, Iwamoto, Kazuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23174095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-4-22
_version_ 1782254796626984960
author Bundo, Miki
Sunaga, Fumiko
Ueda, Junko
Kasai, Kiyoto
Kato, Tadafumi
Iwamoto, Kazuya
author_facet Bundo, Miki
Sunaga, Fumiko
Ueda, Junko
Kasai, Kiyoto
Kato, Tadafumi
Iwamoto, Kazuya
author_sort Bundo, Miki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studying DNA methylation profiles in detail should be the first step in epigenetic research. Although sodium bisulfite modification of genomic DNA is the gold standard method for DNA methylation analysis, this method results in the loss of the majority of the DNA material. Whole genome amplification (WGA) of bisulfite-modified DNA is expected to provide a rich source of materials, but its validity has not been thoroughly evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the extent of biased amplification in the WGA of bisulfite-modified DNA and the reproducibility of independent WGA reactions. We performed the multiple displacement amplification-based WGA separately three times. Each experiment included two reactions using 10 or 50 ng of bisulfite-modified DNA as template. DNA methylation levels were compared between WGA products and original bisulfite-modified DNA at about 450,000 CpG sites. RESULTS: Using a sufficient amount of bisulfite-modified DNA for WGA was critical for downstream application. The considerable deviations from original bisulfite-modified DNA were found in the middle range of DNA methylation levels. Distribution of hyper- and hypomethylation were equal, which suggested that the deviation at each CpG site occurred randomly. Averaging the data from independently amplified WGA products dramatically improved the overall quality. CONCLUSIONS: WGA of bisulfite-modified DNA could be a valuable tool for epigenetic research, but careful experimental design and data interpretation are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3536718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35367182013-01-08 A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA Bundo, Miki Sunaga, Fumiko Ueda, Junko Kasai, Kiyoto Kato, Tadafumi Iwamoto, Kazuya Clin Epigenetics Methodology BACKGROUND: Studying DNA methylation profiles in detail should be the first step in epigenetic research. Although sodium bisulfite modification of genomic DNA is the gold standard method for DNA methylation analysis, this method results in the loss of the majority of the DNA material. Whole genome amplification (WGA) of bisulfite-modified DNA is expected to provide a rich source of materials, but its validity has not been thoroughly evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the extent of biased amplification in the WGA of bisulfite-modified DNA and the reproducibility of independent WGA reactions. We performed the multiple displacement amplification-based WGA separately three times. Each experiment included two reactions using 10 or 50 ng of bisulfite-modified DNA as template. DNA methylation levels were compared between WGA products and original bisulfite-modified DNA at about 450,000 CpG sites. RESULTS: Using a sufficient amount of bisulfite-modified DNA for WGA was critical for downstream application. The considerable deviations from original bisulfite-modified DNA were found in the middle range of DNA methylation levels. Distribution of hyper- and hypomethylation were equal, which suggested that the deviation at each CpG site occurred randomly. Averaging the data from independently amplified WGA products dramatically improved the overall quality. CONCLUSIONS: WGA of bisulfite-modified DNA could be a valuable tool for epigenetic research, but careful experimental design and data interpretation are required. BioMed Central 2012-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3536718/ /pubmed/23174095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-4-22 Text en Copyright ©2012 Bundo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Bundo, Miki
Sunaga, Fumiko
Ueda, Junko
Kasai, Kiyoto
Kato, Tadafumi
Iwamoto, Kazuya
A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA
title A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA
title_full A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA
title_fullStr A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA
title_full_unstemmed A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA
title_short A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA
title_sort systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified dna
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23174095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-4-22
work_keys_str_mv AT bundomiki asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT sunagafumiko asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT uedajunko asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT kasaikiyoto asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT katotadafumi asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT iwamotokazuya asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT bundomiki systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT sunagafumiko systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT uedajunko systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT kasaikiyoto systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT katotadafumi systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna
AT iwamotokazuya systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna