Cargando…
A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA
BACKGROUND: Studying DNA methylation profiles in detail should be the first step in epigenetic research. Although sodium bisulfite modification of genomic DNA is the gold standard method for DNA methylation analysis, this method results in the loss of the majority of the DNA material. Whole genome a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23174095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-4-22 |
_version_ | 1782254796626984960 |
---|---|
author | Bundo, Miki Sunaga, Fumiko Ueda, Junko Kasai, Kiyoto Kato, Tadafumi Iwamoto, Kazuya |
author_facet | Bundo, Miki Sunaga, Fumiko Ueda, Junko Kasai, Kiyoto Kato, Tadafumi Iwamoto, Kazuya |
author_sort | Bundo, Miki |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studying DNA methylation profiles in detail should be the first step in epigenetic research. Although sodium bisulfite modification of genomic DNA is the gold standard method for DNA methylation analysis, this method results in the loss of the majority of the DNA material. Whole genome amplification (WGA) of bisulfite-modified DNA is expected to provide a rich source of materials, but its validity has not been thoroughly evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the extent of biased amplification in the WGA of bisulfite-modified DNA and the reproducibility of independent WGA reactions. We performed the multiple displacement amplification-based WGA separately three times. Each experiment included two reactions using 10 or 50 ng of bisulfite-modified DNA as template. DNA methylation levels were compared between WGA products and original bisulfite-modified DNA at about 450,000 CpG sites. RESULTS: Using a sufficient amount of bisulfite-modified DNA for WGA was critical for downstream application. The considerable deviations from original bisulfite-modified DNA were found in the middle range of DNA methylation levels. Distribution of hyper- and hypomethylation were equal, which suggested that the deviation at each CpG site occurred randomly. Averaging the data from independently amplified WGA products dramatically improved the overall quality. CONCLUSIONS: WGA of bisulfite-modified DNA could be a valuable tool for epigenetic research, but careful experimental design and data interpretation are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3536718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35367182013-01-08 A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA Bundo, Miki Sunaga, Fumiko Ueda, Junko Kasai, Kiyoto Kato, Tadafumi Iwamoto, Kazuya Clin Epigenetics Methodology BACKGROUND: Studying DNA methylation profiles in detail should be the first step in epigenetic research. Although sodium bisulfite modification of genomic DNA is the gold standard method for DNA methylation analysis, this method results in the loss of the majority of the DNA material. Whole genome amplification (WGA) of bisulfite-modified DNA is expected to provide a rich source of materials, but its validity has not been thoroughly evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the extent of biased amplification in the WGA of bisulfite-modified DNA and the reproducibility of independent WGA reactions. We performed the multiple displacement amplification-based WGA separately three times. Each experiment included two reactions using 10 or 50 ng of bisulfite-modified DNA as template. DNA methylation levels were compared between WGA products and original bisulfite-modified DNA at about 450,000 CpG sites. RESULTS: Using a sufficient amount of bisulfite-modified DNA for WGA was critical for downstream application. The considerable deviations from original bisulfite-modified DNA were found in the middle range of DNA methylation levels. Distribution of hyper- and hypomethylation were equal, which suggested that the deviation at each CpG site occurred randomly. Averaging the data from independently amplified WGA products dramatically improved the overall quality. CONCLUSIONS: WGA of bisulfite-modified DNA could be a valuable tool for epigenetic research, but careful experimental design and data interpretation are required. BioMed Central 2012-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3536718/ /pubmed/23174095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-4-22 Text en Copyright ©2012 Bundo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Bundo, Miki Sunaga, Fumiko Ueda, Junko Kasai, Kiyoto Kato, Tadafumi Iwamoto, Kazuya A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA |
title | A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA |
title_full | A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA |
title_fullStr | A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA |
title_short | A systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA |
title_sort | systematic evaluation of whole genome amplification of bisulfite-modified dna |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23174095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-4-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bundomiki asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT sunagafumiko asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT uedajunko asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT kasaikiyoto asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT katotadafumi asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT iwamotokazuya asystematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT bundomiki systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT sunagafumiko systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT uedajunko systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT kasaikiyoto systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT katotadafumi systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna AT iwamotokazuya systematicevaluationofwholegenomeamplificationofbisulfitemodifieddna |