Cargando…

Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for abdominal wall closure has been an issue of ongoing debate. Available studies do not specifically enroll patients who undergo emergency laparotomy and thus do not consider the distinct biological characteristics of these patients. The present randomized controlle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahbari, Nuh N, Knebel, Phillip, Kieser, Meinhard, Bruckner, Thomas, Bartsch, Detlef K, Friess, Helmut, Mihaljevic, Andre L, Stern, Josef, Diener, Markus K, Voss, Sabine, Rossion, Inga, Büchler, Markus W, Seiler, Christoph M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-72
_version_ 1782254797093601280
author Rahbari, Nuh N
Knebel, Phillip
Kieser, Meinhard
Bruckner, Thomas
Bartsch, Detlef K
Friess, Helmut
Mihaljevic, Andre L
Stern, Josef
Diener, Markus K
Voss, Sabine
Rossion, Inga
Büchler, Markus W
Seiler, Christoph M
author_facet Rahbari, Nuh N
Knebel, Phillip
Kieser, Meinhard
Bruckner, Thomas
Bartsch, Detlef K
Friess, Helmut
Mihaljevic, Andre L
Stern, Josef
Diener, Markus K
Voss, Sabine
Rossion, Inga
Büchler, Markus W
Seiler, Christoph M
author_sort Rahbari, Nuh N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for abdominal wall closure has been an issue of ongoing debate. Available studies do not specifically enroll patients who undergo emergency laparotomy and thus do not consider the distinct biological characteristics of these patients. The present randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary emergency midline laparotomy. METHODS/DESIGN: The CONTINT trial is a multicenter, open label, randomized controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Patients undergoing a primary emergency midline laparotomy are enrolled in the trial. The two most commonly applied strategies of abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomy are compared: the continuous, all-layer suture technique using slowly absorbable monofilament material (two Monoplus® loops) and the interrupted suture technique using rapidly absorbable braided material (Vicryl® sutures). The primary endpoint within the CONTINT trial is an incisional hernia within 12 months or a burst abdomen within 30 days after surgery. As reliable data on this primary endpoint is not available for patients undergoing emergency surgery, an adaptive interim analysis will be conducted after the inclusion of 80 patients, allowing early termination of the trial if necessary or modification of design characteristics such as recalculation of sample size. DISCUSSION: This is a randomized controlled multicenter trial with a two-group parallel design to assess the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary emergency midline laparotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00544583
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3536720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35367202013-01-08 Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583] Rahbari, Nuh N Knebel, Phillip Kieser, Meinhard Bruckner, Thomas Bartsch, Detlef K Friess, Helmut Mihaljevic, Andre L Stern, Josef Diener, Markus K Voss, Sabine Rossion, Inga Büchler, Markus W Seiler, Christoph M Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for abdominal wall closure has been an issue of ongoing debate. Available studies do not specifically enroll patients who undergo emergency laparotomy and thus do not consider the distinct biological characteristics of these patients. The present randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary emergency midline laparotomy. METHODS/DESIGN: The CONTINT trial is a multicenter, open label, randomized controlled trial with a two-group parallel design. Patients undergoing a primary emergency midline laparotomy are enrolled in the trial. The two most commonly applied strategies of abdominal wall closure after midline laparotomy are compared: the continuous, all-layer suture technique using slowly absorbable monofilament material (two Monoplus® loops) and the interrupted suture technique using rapidly absorbable braided material (Vicryl® sutures). The primary endpoint within the CONTINT trial is an incisional hernia within 12 months or a burst abdomen within 30 days after surgery. As reliable data on this primary endpoint is not available for patients undergoing emergency surgery, an adaptive interim analysis will be conducted after the inclusion of 80 patients, allowing early termination of the trial if necessary or modification of design characteristics such as recalculation of sample size. DISCUSSION: This is a randomized controlled multicenter trial with a two-group parallel design to assess the efficacy and safety of two commonly applied abdominal wall closure strategies in patients undergoing primary emergency midline laparotomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00544583 BioMed Central 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3536720/ /pubmed/22647387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-72 Text en Copyright ©2012 Rahbari et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Rahbari, Nuh N
Knebel, Phillip
Kieser, Meinhard
Bruckner, Thomas
Bartsch, Detlef K
Friess, Helmut
Mihaljevic, Andre L
Stern, Josef
Diener, Markus K
Voss, Sabine
Rossion, Inga
Büchler, Markus W
Seiler, Christoph M
Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]
title Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]
title_full Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]
title_fullStr Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]
title_full_unstemmed Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]
title_short Design and current status of CONTINT: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [NCT00544583]
title_sort design and current status of contint: continuous versus interrupted abdominal wall closure after emergency midline laparotomy - a randomized controlled multicenter trial [nct00544583]
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-72
work_keys_str_mv AT rahbarinuhn designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT knebelphillip designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT kiesermeinhard designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT brucknerthomas designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT bartschdetlefk designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT friesshelmut designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT mihaljevicandrel designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT sternjosef designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT dienermarkusk designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT vosssabine designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT rossioninga designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT buchlermarkusw designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583
AT seilerchristophm designandcurrentstatusofcontintcontinuousversusinterruptedabdominalwallclosureafteremergencymidlinelaparotomyarandomizedcontrolledmulticentertrialnct00544583