Cargando…

Nuisance Ecology: Do Scavenging Condors Exact Foraging Costs on Pumas in Patagonia?

Predation risk describes the energetic cost an animal suffers when making a trade off between maximizing energy intake and minimizing threats to its survival. We tested whether Andean condors (Vultur gryphus) influenced the foraging behaviors of a top predator in Patagonia, the puma (Puma concolor),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elbroch, L. Mark, Wittmer, Heiko U.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23301093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053595
_version_ 1782254804447264768
author Elbroch, L. Mark
Wittmer, Heiko U.
author_facet Elbroch, L. Mark
Wittmer, Heiko U.
author_sort Elbroch, L. Mark
collection PubMed
description Predation risk describes the energetic cost an animal suffers when making a trade off between maximizing energy intake and minimizing threats to its survival. We tested whether Andean condors (Vultur gryphus) influenced the foraging behaviors of a top predator in Patagonia, the puma (Puma concolor), in ways comparable to direct risks of predation for prey to address three questions: 1) Do condors exact a foraging cost on pumas?; 2) If so, do pumas exhibit behaviors indicative of these risks?; and 3) Do pumas display predictable behaviors associated with prey species foraging in risky environments? Using GPS location data, we located 433 kill sites of 9 pumas and quantified their kill rates. Based upon time pumas spent at a carcass, we quantified handling time. Pumas abandoned >10% of edible meat at 133 of 266 large carcasses after a single night, and did so most often in open grasslands where their carcasses were easily detected by condors. Our data suggested that condors exacted foraging costs on pumas by significantly decreasing puma handling times at carcasses, and that pumas increased their kill rates by 50% relative to those reported for North America to compensate for these losses. Finally, we determined that the relative risks of detection and associated harassment by condors, rather than prey densities, explained puma “giving up times” (GUTs) across structurally variable risk classes in the study area, and that, like many prey species, pumas disproportionately hunted in high-risk, high-resource reward areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3536754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35367542013-01-08 Nuisance Ecology: Do Scavenging Condors Exact Foraging Costs on Pumas in Patagonia? Elbroch, L. Mark Wittmer, Heiko U. PLoS One Research Article Predation risk describes the energetic cost an animal suffers when making a trade off between maximizing energy intake and minimizing threats to its survival. We tested whether Andean condors (Vultur gryphus) influenced the foraging behaviors of a top predator in Patagonia, the puma (Puma concolor), in ways comparable to direct risks of predation for prey to address three questions: 1) Do condors exact a foraging cost on pumas?; 2) If so, do pumas exhibit behaviors indicative of these risks?; and 3) Do pumas display predictable behaviors associated with prey species foraging in risky environments? Using GPS location data, we located 433 kill sites of 9 pumas and quantified their kill rates. Based upon time pumas spent at a carcass, we quantified handling time. Pumas abandoned >10% of edible meat at 133 of 266 large carcasses after a single night, and did so most often in open grasslands where their carcasses were easily detected by condors. Our data suggested that condors exacted foraging costs on pumas by significantly decreasing puma handling times at carcasses, and that pumas increased their kill rates by 50% relative to those reported for North America to compensate for these losses. Finally, we determined that the relative risks of detection and associated harassment by condors, rather than prey densities, explained puma “giving up times” (GUTs) across structurally variable risk classes in the study area, and that, like many prey species, pumas disproportionately hunted in high-risk, high-resource reward areas. Public Library of Science 2013-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3536754/ /pubmed/23301093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053595 Text en © 2013 Elbroch, Wittmer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elbroch, L. Mark
Wittmer, Heiko U.
Nuisance Ecology: Do Scavenging Condors Exact Foraging Costs on Pumas in Patagonia?
title Nuisance Ecology: Do Scavenging Condors Exact Foraging Costs on Pumas in Patagonia?
title_full Nuisance Ecology: Do Scavenging Condors Exact Foraging Costs on Pumas in Patagonia?
title_fullStr Nuisance Ecology: Do Scavenging Condors Exact Foraging Costs on Pumas in Patagonia?
title_full_unstemmed Nuisance Ecology: Do Scavenging Condors Exact Foraging Costs on Pumas in Patagonia?
title_short Nuisance Ecology: Do Scavenging Condors Exact Foraging Costs on Pumas in Patagonia?
title_sort nuisance ecology: do scavenging condors exact foraging costs on pumas in patagonia?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23301093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053595
work_keys_str_mv AT elbrochlmark nuisanceecologydoscavengingcondorsexactforagingcostsonpumasinpatagonia
AT wittmerheikou nuisanceecologydoscavengingcondorsexactforagingcostsonpumasinpatagonia