Cargando…

Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy

Several implant surface debridement methods have been reported for the treatment of peri-implantitis, however, some of them can damage the implant surface or promote bacterial resistance. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new treatment option for peri-implantitis. The aim of this in vitro study was to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marotti, Juliana, Tortamano, Pedro, Cai, Silvana, Ribeiro, Martha Simões, Franco, João Eduardo Miranda, de Campos, Tomie Toyota
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22790655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1148-6
_version_ 1782254825089531904
author Marotti, Juliana
Tortamano, Pedro
Cai, Silvana
Ribeiro, Martha Simões
Franco, João Eduardo Miranda
de Campos, Tomie Toyota
author_facet Marotti, Juliana
Tortamano, Pedro
Cai, Silvana
Ribeiro, Martha Simões
Franco, João Eduardo Miranda
de Campos, Tomie Toyota
author_sort Marotti, Juliana
collection PubMed
description Several implant surface debridement methods have been reported for the treatment of peri-implantitis, however, some of them can damage the implant surface or promote bacterial resistance. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new treatment option for peri-implantitis. The aim of this in vitro study was to analyze implant surface decontamination by means of PDT. Sixty implants were equally distributed (n = 10) into four groups and two subgroups. In group G1 there was no decontamination, while in G2 decontamination was performed with chlorhexidine. G3 (PDT − laser + dye) and G4 (laser, without dye) were divided into two subgroups each; with PDT performed for 3 min in G3a and G4a, and for 5 min in G3b and G4b. After 5 min in contact with methylene blue dye (G3), the implants were irradiated (G3 and G4) with a low-level laser (GaAlAs, 660 nm, 30 mW) for 3 or 5 min (7.2 and 12 J). After the dilutions, culture media were kept in an anaerobic atmosphere for 1 week, and then colony forming units were counted. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) between G1 and the other groups, and between G4 in comparison with G2 and G3. Better decontamination was obtained in G2 and G3, with no statistically significant difference between them. The results of this study suggest that photodynamic therapy can be considered an efficient method for reducing bacteria on implant surfaces, whereas laser irradiation without dye was less efficient than PDT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3536948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35369482013-01-04 Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy Marotti, Juliana Tortamano, Pedro Cai, Silvana Ribeiro, Martha Simões Franco, João Eduardo Miranda de Campos, Tomie Toyota Lasers Med Sci Original Article Several implant surface debridement methods have been reported for the treatment of peri-implantitis, however, some of them can damage the implant surface or promote bacterial resistance. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new treatment option for peri-implantitis. The aim of this in vitro study was to analyze implant surface decontamination by means of PDT. Sixty implants were equally distributed (n = 10) into four groups and two subgroups. In group G1 there was no decontamination, while in G2 decontamination was performed with chlorhexidine. G3 (PDT − laser + dye) and G4 (laser, without dye) were divided into two subgroups each; with PDT performed for 3 min in G3a and G4a, and for 5 min in G3b and G4b. After 5 min in contact with methylene blue dye (G3), the implants were irradiated (G3 and G4) with a low-level laser (GaAlAs, 660 nm, 30 mW) for 3 or 5 min (7.2 and 12 J). After the dilutions, culture media were kept in an anaerobic atmosphere for 1 week, and then colony forming units were counted. There was a significant difference (p < 0.001) between G1 and the other groups, and between G4 in comparison with G2 and G3. Better decontamination was obtained in G2 and G3, with no statistically significant difference between them. The results of this study suggest that photodynamic therapy can be considered an efficient method for reducing bacteria on implant surfaces, whereas laser irradiation without dye was less efficient than PDT. Springer-Verlag 2012-07-12 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3536948/ /pubmed/22790655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1148-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Marotti, Juliana
Tortamano, Pedro
Cai, Silvana
Ribeiro, Martha Simões
Franco, João Eduardo Miranda
de Campos, Tomie Toyota
Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy
title Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy
title_full Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy
title_fullStr Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy
title_full_unstemmed Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy
title_short Decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy
title_sort decontamination of dental implant surfaces by means of photodynamic therapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3536948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22790655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1148-6
work_keys_str_mv AT marottijuliana decontaminationofdentalimplantsurfacesbymeansofphotodynamictherapy
AT tortamanopedro decontaminationofdentalimplantsurfacesbymeansofphotodynamictherapy
AT caisilvana decontaminationofdentalimplantsurfacesbymeansofphotodynamictherapy
AT ribeiromarthasimoes decontaminationofdentalimplantsurfacesbymeansofphotodynamictherapy
AT francojoaoeduardomiranda decontaminationofdentalimplantsurfacesbymeansofphotodynamictherapy
AT decampostomietoyota decontaminationofdentalimplantsurfacesbymeansofphotodynamictherapy