Cargando…
Developing consensus-based policy solutions for medicines adherence for Europe: a delphi study
BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to prescribed medication is a pervasive problem that can incur serious effects on patients’ health outcomes and well-being, and the availability of resources in healthcare systems. This study aimed to develop practical consensus-based policy solutions to address medicines n...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3537728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23176439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-425 |
_version_ | 1782254905178718208 |
---|---|
author | Clyne, Wendy White, Simon McLachlan, Sarah |
author_facet | Clyne, Wendy White, Simon McLachlan, Sarah |
author_sort | Clyne, Wendy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to prescribed medication is a pervasive problem that can incur serious effects on patients’ health outcomes and well-being, and the availability of resources in healthcare systems. This study aimed to develop practical consensus-based policy solutions to address medicines non-adherence for Europe. METHODS: A four-round Delphi study was conducted. The Delphi Expert Panel comprised 50 participants from 14 countries and was representative of: patient/carers organisations; healthcare providers and professionals; commissioners and policy makers; academics; and industry representatives. Participants engaged in the study remotely, anonymously and electronically. Participants were invited to respond to open questions about the causes, consequences and solutions to medicines non-adherence. Subsequent rounds refined responses, and sought ratings of the relative importance, and operational and political feasibility of each potential solution to medicines non-adherence. Feedback of individual and group responses was provided to participants after each round. Members of the Delphi Expert Panel and members of the research group participated in a consensus meeting upon completion of the Delphi study to discuss and further refine the proposed policy solutions. RESULTS: 43 separate policy solutions to medication non-adherence were agreed by the Panel. 25 policy solutions were prioritised based on composite scores for importance, and operational and political feasibility. Prioritised policy solutions focused on interventions for patients, training for healthcare professionals, and actions to support partnership between patients and healthcare professionals. Few solutions concerned actions by governments, healthcare commissioners, or interventions at the system level. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus about practical actions necessary to address non-adherence to medicines has been developed for Europe. These actions are also applicable to other regions. Prioritised policy solutions for medicines non-adherence offer a benefit to policymakers and healthcare providers seeking to address this multifaceted, complex problem. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3537728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35377282013-01-10 Developing consensus-based policy solutions for medicines adherence for Europe: a delphi study Clyne, Wendy White, Simon McLachlan, Sarah BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-adherence to prescribed medication is a pervasive problem that can incur serious effects on patients’ health outcomes and well-being, and the availability of resources in healthcare systems. This study aimed to develop practical consensus-based policy solutions to address medicines non-adherence for Europe. METHODS: A four-round Delphi study was conducted. The Delphi Expert Panel comprised 50 participants from 14 countries and was representative of: patient/carers organisations; healthcare providers and professionals; commissioners and policy makers; academics; and industry representatives. Participants engaged in the study remotely, anonymously and electronically. Participants were invited to respond to open questions about the causes, consequences and solutions to medicines non-adherence. Subsequent rounds refined responses, and sought ratings of the relative importance, and operational and political feasibility of each potential solution to medicines non-adherence. Feedback of individual and group responses was provided to participants after each round. Members of the Delphi Expert Panel and members of the research group participated in a consensus meeting upon completion of the Delphi study to discuss and further refine the proposed policy solutions. RESULTS: 43 separate policy solutions to medication non-adherence were agreed by the Panel. 25 policy solutions were prioritised based on composite scores for importance, and operational and political feasibility. Prioritised policy solutions focused on interventions for patients, training for healthcare professionals, and actions to support partnership between patients and healthcare professionals. Few solutions concerned actions by governments, healthcare commissioners, or interventions at the system level. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus about practical actions necessary to address non-adherence to medicines has been developed for Europe. These actions are also applicable to other regions. Prioritised policy solutions for medicines non-adherence offer a benefit to policymakers and healthcare providers seeking to address this multifaceted, complex problem. BioMed Central 2012-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3537728/ /pubmed/23176439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-425 Text en Copyright ©2012 Clyne et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Clyne, Wendy White, Simon McLachlan, Sarah Developing consensus-based policy solutions for medicines adherence for Europe: a delphi study |
title | Developing consensus-based policy solutions for medicines adherence for Europe: a delphi study |
title_full | Developing consensus-based policy solutions for medicines adherence for Europe: a delphi study |
title_fullStr | Developing consensus-based policy solutions for medicines adherence for Europe: a delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing consensus-based policy solutions for medicines adherence for Europe: a delphi study |
title_short | Developing consensus-based policy solutions for medicines adherence for Europe: a delphi study |
title_sort | developing consensus-based policy solutions for medicines adherence for europe: a delphi study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3537728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23176439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-425 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clynewendy developingconsensusbasedpolicysolutionsformedicinesadherenceforeuropeadelphistudy AT whitesimon developingconsensusbasedpolicysolutionsformedicinesadherenceforeuropeadelphistudy AT mclachlansarah developingconsensusbasedpolicysolutionsformedicinesadherenceforeuropeadelphistudy |