Cargando…

The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: From 2006 to 2009, the Dutch government provided €5 m annually for a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in psychiatric hospitals by 10% a year. We aimed to establish whether the numbers of both seclusion and involuntary medication changed significantly after the start of this nationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vruwink, Fleur J, Mulder, Cornelis L, Noorthoorn, Eric O, Uitenbroek, Daan, Nijman, Henk LI
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3538066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-231
_version_ 1782254927201959936
author Vruwink, Fleur J
Mulder, Cornelis L
Noorthoorn, Eric O
Uitenbroek, Daan
Nijman, Henk LI
author_facet Vruwink, Fleur J
Mulder, Cornelis L
Noorthoorn, Eric O
Uitenbroek, Daan
Nijman, Henk LI
author_sort Vruwink, Fleur J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: From 2006 to 2009, the Dutch government provided €5 m annually for a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in psychiatric hospitals by 10% a year. We aimed to establish whether the numbers of both seclusion and involuntary medication changed significantly after the start of this national program. METHODS: Using Poisson regression to estimate difference in logit slopes, we analyzed data for 1998–2009 from the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, retrospectively examining the national numbers of seclusion and involuntary medication before and after the start of the program. RESULTS: The difference in slopes of the numbers of seclusion before and after the start of the program was statistically significant (difference 5.2%: p < 0.001). After the start of the program seclusions dropped 2.0% per year. Corrected for the increasing number of involuntary hospitalizations this figure was 4.7% per year. The difference in slopes of the numbers of involuntary medication did not change statistically significant (difference 0.5%, n.s.). After correction for the increasing number of involuntary hospitalizations the difference turned significant (difference 3.3%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: After the start of the nationwide program the number of seclusions fell, and although significantly changing, the reduction was modest and failed to meet the objective of a 10% annual decrease. The number of involuntary medications did not change; instead, after correction for the number of involuntary hospitalizations, it increased.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3538066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35380662013-01-10 The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands Vruwink, Fleur J Mulder, Cornelis L Noorthoorn, Eric O Uitenbroek, Daan Nijman, Henk LI BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: From 2006 to 2009, the Dutch government provided €5 m annually for a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in psychiatric hospitals by 10% a year. We aimed to establish whether the numbers of both seclusion and involuntary medication changed significantly after the start of this national program. METHODS: Using Poisson regression to estimate difference in logit slopes, we analyzed data for 1998–2009 from the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate, retrospectively examining the national numbers of seclusion and involuntary medication before and after the start of the program. RESULTS: The difference in slopes of the numbers of seclusion before and after the start of the program was statistically significant (difference 5.2%: p < 0.001). After the start of the program seclusions dropped 2.0% per year. Corrected for the increasing number of involuntary hospitalizations this figure was 4.7% per year. The difference in slopes of the numbers of involuntary medication did not change statistically significant (difference 0.5%, n.s.). After correction for the increasing number of involuntary hospitalizations the difference turned significant (difference 3.3%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: After the start of the nationwide program the number of seclusions fell, and although significantly changing, the reduction was modest and failed to meet the objective of a 10% annual decrease. The number of involuntary medications did not change; instead, after correction for the number of involuntary hospitalizations, it increased. BioMed Central 2012-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3538066/ /pubmed/23249413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-231 Text en Copyright ©2012 Vruwink et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vruwink, Fleur J
Mulder, Cornelis L
Noorthoorn, Eric O
Uitenbroek, Daan
Nijman, Henk LI
The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands
title The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands
title_full The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands
title_fullStr The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands
title_short The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands
title_sort effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the netherlands
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3538066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23249413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-231
work_keys_str_mv AT vruwinkfleurj theeffectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands
AT muldercornelisl theeffectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands
AT noorthoornerico theeffectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands
AT uitenbroekdaan theeffectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands
AT nijmanhenkli theeffectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands
AT vruwinkfleurj effectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands
AT muldercornelisl effectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands
AT noorthoornerico effectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands
AT uitenbroekdaan effectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands
AT nijmanhenkli effectsofanationwideprogramtoreduceseclusioninthenetherlands