Cargando…

Directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly

BACKGROUND: Organisms may respond to environmental change by means of genetic adaptation, phenotypic plasticity or both, which may result in genotype-environment interactions (G x E) if genotypes differ in their phenotypic response. We here specifically target the latter source of variation (i.e. G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franke, Kristin, Dierks, Anneke, Fischer, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3538507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23217138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-235
_version_ 1782254950424772608
author Franke, Kristin
Dierks, Anneke
Fischer, Klaus
author_facet Franke, Kristin
Dierks, Anneke
Fischer, Klaus
author_sort Franke, Kristin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Organisms may respond to environmental change by means of genetic adaptation, phenotypic plasticity or both, which may result in genotype-environment interactions (G x E) if genotypes differ in their phenotypic response. We here specifically target the latter source of variation (i.e. G x E) by comparing plastic responses among lines of the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana that had been selected for increased cold tolerance and according controls. Our main aim here was to test the hypothesis that directional selection on cold tolerance will interfere with plastic capacities. RESULTS: Plastic responses to temperature and feeding treatments were strong, with e.g. higher compared to lower temperatures reducing cold tolerance, longevity, pupal mass, and development time. We report a number of statistically significant genotype-environment interactions (i.e. interactions between selection regime and environmental variables), but most of these were not consistent across treatment groups. We found some evidence though for larger plastic responses to different rearing temperatures in the selection compared to the control lines, while plastic responses to different adult temperatures and feeding treatments were overall very similar across selection regimes. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that plastic capacities are not always constrained by directional selection (on cold tolerance) and therefore genetic changes in trait means, but may operate independently.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3538507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35385072013-01-10 Directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly Franke, Kristin Dierks, Anneke Fischer, Klaus BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Organisms may respond to environmental change by means of genetic adaptation, phenotypic plasticity or both, which may result in genotype-environment interactions (G x E) if genotypes differ in their phenotypic response. We here specifically target the latter source of variation (i.e. G x E) by comparing plastic responses among lines of the tropical butterfly Bicyclus anynana that had been selected for increased cold tolerance and according controls. Our main aim here was to test the hypothesis that directional selection on cold tolerance will interfere with plastic capacities. RESULTS: Plastic responses to temperature and feeding treatments were strong, with e.g. higher compared to lower temperatures reducing cold tolerance, longevity, pupal mass, and development time. We report a number of statistically significant genotype-environment interactions (i.e. interactions between selection regime and environmental variables), but most of these were not consistent across treatment groups. We found some evidence though for larger plastic responses to different rearing temperatures in the selection compared to the control lines, while plastic responses to different adult temperatures and feeding treatments were overall very similar across selection regimes. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that plastic capacities are not always constrained by directional selection (on cold tolerance) and therefore genetic changes in trait means, but may operate independently. BioMed Central 2012-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3538507/ /pubmed/23217138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-235 Text en Copyright ©2012 Franke et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Franke, Kristin
Dierks, Anneke
Fischer, Klaus
Directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly
title Directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly
title_full Directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly
title_fullStr Directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly
title_full_unstemmed Directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly
title_short Directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly
title_sort directional selection on cold tolerance does not constrain plastic capacity in a butterfly
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3538507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23217138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-235
work_keys_str_mv AT frankekristin directionalselectiononcoldtolerancedoesnotconstrainplasticcapacityinabutterfly
AT dierksanneke directionalselectiononcoldtolerancedoesnotconstrainplasticcapacityinabutterfly
AT fischerklaus directionalselectiononcoldtolerancedoesnotconstrainplasticcapacityinabutterfly