Cargando…

Optimized microbial DNA extraction from diarrheic stools

BACKGROUND: The detection of enteropathogens in stool specimens increasingly relies on the detection of specific nucleic acid sequences. We observed that such detection was hampered in diarrheic stool specimens and we set-up an improved protocol combining lyophilization of stools prior to a semi-aut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donatin, Emilie, Drancourt, Michel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3538598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23273000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-702
_version_ 1782254972360982528
author Donatin, Emilie
Drancourt, Michel
author_facet Donatin, Emilie
Drancourt, Michel
author_sort Donatin, Emilie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The detection of enteropathogens in stool specimens increasingly relies on the detection of specific nucleic acid sequences. We observed that such detection was hampered in diarrheic stool specimens and we set-up an improved protocol combining lyophilization of stools prior to a semi-automated DNA extraction. FINDINGS: A total of 41 human diarrheic stool specimens comprising of 35 specimens negative for enteropathogens and six specimens positive for Salmonella enterica in culture, were prospectively studied. One 1-mL aliquot of each specimen was lyophilised and total DNA was extracted from lyophilised and non-lyophilised aliquots by combining automatic and phenol-chloroform DNA extraction. DNA was incorporated into real-time PCRs targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Bacteria and the archaea Methanobrevibacter smithii and the chorismate synthase gene of S. enterica. Whereas negative controls consisting in DNA-free water remained negative, M. smithii was detected in 26/41 (63.4%) non-lyophilised (Ct value 28.78 ± 9.1) versus 39/41 (95.1%) lyophilised aliquots (Ct value 22.04 ± 5.5); bacterial 16S rRNA was detected in 33/41 (80.5%) non-lyophilised (Ct value 28.11 ± 5.9) versus 40/41 (97.6%) lyophilised aliquots (Ct value 24.94 ± 6.6); and S. enterica was detected in 6/6 (100%) non-lyophilized and lyophilized aliquots (Ct value 26.98 ± 4.55 and 26.16 ± 4.97, respectively). S. enterica was not detected in the 35 remaining diarrheal-stool specimens. The proportion of positive specimens was significantly higher after lyophilization for the detection of M. smithii (p = 0.00043) and Bacteria (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Lyophilization of diarrheic stool specimens significantly increases the PCR-based detection of microorganisms. The semi-automated protocol described here could be routinely used for the molecular diagnosis of infectious diarrhea.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3538598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35385982013-01-10 Optimized microbial DNA extraction from diarrheic stools Donatin, Emilie Drancourt, Michel BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: The detection of enteropathogens in stool specimens increasingly relies on the detection of specific nucleic acid sequences. We observed that such detection was hampered in diarrheic stool specimens and we set-up an improved protocol combining lyophilization of stools prior to a semi-automated DNA extraction. FINDINGS: A total of 41 human diarrheic stool specimens comprising of 35 specimens negative for enteropathogens and six specimens positive for Salmonella enterica in culture, were prospectively studied. One 1-mL aliquot of each specimen was lyophilised and total DNA was extracted from lyophilised and non-lyophilised aliquots by combining automatic and phenol-chloroform DNA extraction. DNA was incorporated into real-time PCRs targeting the 16S rRNA gene of Bacteria and the archaea Methanobrevibacter smithii and the chorismate synthase gene of S. enterica. Whereas negative controls consisting in DNA-free water remained negative, M. smithii was detected in 26/41 (63.4%) non-lyophilised (Ct value 28.78 ± 9.1) versus 39/41 (95.1%) lyophilised aliquots (Ct value 22.04 ± 5.5); bacterial 16S rRNA was detected in 33/41 (80.5%) non-lyophilised (Ct value 28.11 ± 5.9) versus 40/41 (97.6%) lyophilised aliquots (Ct value 24.94 ± 6.6); and S. enterica was detected in 6/6 (100%) non-lyophilized and lyophilized aliquots (Ct value 26.98 ± 4.55 and 26.16 ± 4.97, respectively). S. enterica was not detected in the 35 remaining diarrheal-stool specimens. The proportion of positive specimens was significantly higher after lyophilization for the detection of M. smithii (p = 0.00043) and Bacteria (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Lyophilization of diarrheic stool specimens significantly increases the PCR-based detection of microorganisms. The semi-automated protocol described here could be routinely used for the molecular diagnosis of infectious diarrhea. BioMed Central 2012-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3538598/ /pubmed/23273000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-702 Text en Copyright ©2012 Donatin and Drancourt; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Donatin, Emilie
Drancourt, Michel
Optimized microbial DNA extraction from diarrheic stools
title Optimized microbial DNA extraction from diarrheic stools
title_full Optimized microbial DNA extraction from diarrheic stools
title_fullStr Optimized microbial DNA extraction from diarrheic stools
title_full_unstemmed Optimized microbial DNA extraction from diarrheic stools
title_short Optimized microbial DNA extraction from diarrheic stools
title_sort optimized microbial dna extraction from diarrheic stools
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3538598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23273000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-702
work_keys_str_mv AT donatinemilie optimizedmicrobialdnaextractionfromdiarrheicstools
AT drancourtmichel optimizedmicrobialdnaextractionfromdiarrheicstools