Cargando…

Low Formalin Concentrations Induce Fine-Tuned Responses That Are Sex and Age-Dependent: A Developmental Study

The formalin test is increasingly applied as a model of inflammatory pain using high formalin concentrations (5–15%). However, little is known about the effects of low formalin concentrations on related behavioural responses. To examine this, rat pups were subjected to various concentrations of form...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zouikr, Ihssane, Tadros, Melissa A., Clifton, Vicki L., Beagley, Kenneth W., Hodgson, Deborah M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3538774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23308208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053384
_version_ 1782255014332334080
author Zouikr, Ihssane
Tadros, Melissa A.
Clifton, Vicki L.
Beagley, Kenneth W.
Hodgson, Deborah M.
author_facet Zouikr, Ihssane
Tadros, Melissa A.
Clifton, Vicki L.
Beagley, Kenneth W.
Hodgson, Deborah M.
author_sort Zouikr, Ihssane
collection PubMed
description The formalin test is increasingly applied as a model of inflammatory pain using high formalin concentrations (5–15%). However, little is known about the effects of low formalin concentrations on related behavioural responses. To examine this, rat pups were subjected to various concentrations of formalin at four developmental stages: 7, 13, 22, and 82 days of age. At postnatal day (PND) 7, sex differences in flinching but not licking responses were observed with 0.5% formalin evoking higher flinching in males than in females. A dose response was evident in that 0.5% formalin also produced higher licking responses compared to 0.3% or 0.4% formalin. At PND 13, a concentration of 0.8% formalin evoked a biphasic response. At PND 22, a concentration of 1.1% evoked higher flinching and licking responses during the late phase (10–30 min) in both males and females. During the early phase (0–5 min), 1.1% evoked higher licking responses compared to 0.9% or 1% formalin. 1.1% formalin produced a biphasic response that was not evident with 0.9 or 1%. At PND 82, rats displayed a biphasic pattern in response to three formalin concentrations (1.25%, 1.75% and 2.25%) with the presence of an interphase for both 1.75% and 2.25% but not for 1.25%. These data suggest that low formalin concentrations induce fine-tuned responses that are not apparent with the high formalin concentration commonly used in the formalin test. These data also show that the developing nociceptive system is very sensitive to subtle changes in formalin concentrations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3538774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35387742013-01-10 Low Formalin Concentrations Induce Fine-Tuned Responses That Are Sex and Age-Dependent: A Developmental Study Zouikr, Ihssane Tadros, Melissa A. Clifton, Vicki L. Beagley, Kenneth W. Hodgson, Deborah M. PLoS One Research Article The formalin test is increasingly applied as a model of inflammatory pain using high formalin concentrations (5–15%). However, little is known about the effects of low formalin concentrations on related behavioural responses. To examine this, rat pups were subjected to various concentrations of formalin at four developmental stages: 7, 13, 22, and 82 days of age. At postnatal day (PND) 7, sex differences in flinching but not licking responses were observed with 0.5% formalin evoking higher flinching in males than in females. A dose response was evident in that 0.5% formalin also produced higher licking responses compared to 0.3% or 0.4% formalin. At PND 13, a concentration of 0.8% formalin evoked a biphasic response. At PND 22, a concentration of 1.1% evoked higher flinching and licking responses during the late phase (10–30 min) in both males and females. During the early phase (0–5 min), 1.1% evoked higher licking responses compared to 0.9% or 1% formalin. 1.1% formalin produced a biphasic response that was not evident with 0.9 or 1%. At PND 82, rats displayed a biphasic pattern in response to three formalin concentrations (1.25%, 1.75% and 2.25%) with the presence of an interphase for both 1.75% and 2.25% but not for 1.25%. These data suggest that low formalin concentrations induce fine-tuned responses that are not apparent with the high formalin concentration commonly used in the formalin test. These data also show that the developing nociceptive system is very sensitive to subtle changes in formalin concentrations. Public Library of Science 2013-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3538774/ /pubmed/23308208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053384 Text en © 2013 Zouikr et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zouikr, Ihssane
Tadros, Melissa A.
Clifton, Vicki L.
Beagley, Kenneth W.
Hodgson, Deborah M.
Low Formalin Concentrations Induce Fine-Tuned Responses That Are Sex and Age-Dependent: A Developmental Study
title Low Formalin Concentrations Induce Fine-Tuned Responses That Are Sex and Age-Dependent: A Developmental Study
title_full Low Formalin Concentrations Induce Fine-Tuned Responses That Are Sex and Age-Dependent: A Developmental Study
title_fullStr Low Formalin Concentrations Induce Fine-Tuned Responses That Are Sex and Age-Dependent: A Developmental Study
title_full_unstemmed Low Formalin Concentrations Induce Fine-Tuned Responses That Are Sex and Age-Dependent: A Developmental Study
title_short Low Formalin Concentrations Induce Fine-Tuned Responses That Are Sex and Age-Dependent: A Developmental Study
title_sort low formalin concentrations induce fine-tuned responses that are sex and age-dependent: a developmental study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3538774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23308208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053384
work_keys_str_mv AT zouikrihssane lowformalinconcentrationsinducefinetunedresponsesthataresexandagedependentadevelopmentalstudy
AT tadrosmelissaa lowformalinconcentrationsinducefinetunedresponsesthataresexandagedependentadevelopmentalstudy
AT cliftonvickil lowformalinconcentrationsinducefinetunedresponsesthataresexandagedependentadevelopmentalstudy
AT beagleykennethw lowformalinconcentrationsinducefinetunedresponsesthataresexandagedependentadevelopmentalstudy
AT hodgsondeborahm lowformalinconcentrationsinducefinetunedresponsesthataresexandagedependentadevelopmentalstudy