Cargando…
A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer
This multi-center Phase II study evaluated lapatinib, pazopanib, and the combination in patients with relapsed HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. In Cohort 1, 76 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive lapatinib 1,500 mg + placebo or lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg (double-blind) once daily unt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23239151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2369-x |
_version_ | 1782255039069290496 |
---|---|
author | Cristofanilli, Massimo Johnston, Stephen R. D. Manikhas, Alexey Gomez, Henry L. Gladkov, Oleg Shao, Zhimin Safina, Sufia Blackwell, Kimberly L. Alvarez, Ricardo H. Rubin, Stephen D. Ranganathan, Sulabha Redhu, Suman Trudeau, Maureen E. |
author_facet | Cristofanilli, Massimo Johnston, Stephen R. D. Manikhas, Alexey Gomez, Henry L. Gladkov, Oleg Shao, Zhimin Safina, Sufia Blackwell, Kimberly L. Alvarez, Ricardo H. Rubin, Stephen D. Ranganathan, Sulabha Redhu, Suman Trudeau, Maureen E. |
author_sort | Cristofanilli, Massimo |
collection | PubMed |
description | This multi-center Phase II study evaluated lapatinib, pazopanib, and the combination in patients with relapsed HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. In Cohort 1, 76 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive lapatinib 1,500 mg + placebo or lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg (double-blind) once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Due to high-grade diarrhea observed with this dose combination in another study (VEG20007), Cohort 1 was closed. The protocol was amended such that an additional 88 patients (Cohort 2) were randomized in a 5:5:2 ratio to receive daily monotherapy lapatinib 1,500 mg, lapatinib 1,000 mg + pazopanib 400 mg, or monotherapy pazopanib 800 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. In Cohort 1, ORR for the lapatinib (n = 38) and combination (n = 38) arms was 29 and 45 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.1 and 14.3 weeks, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the combination arm (71 %) than in the lapatinib arm (24 %). Dose reductions and interruptions due to AEs were also more frequent in the combination arm (45 and 53 %, respectively) than in the lapatinib monotherapy arm (0 and 11 %, respectively). In Cohort 2, ORR for patients treated with lapatinib (n = 36), lapatinib + pazopanib (n = 38), and pazopanib (n = 13) was 47, 58, and 31 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.0, 16.0, and 11.4 weeks, respectively. In the lapatinib, combination, and pazopanib therapy arms, grade ≥3 AEs were reported for 17, 50, and 46 % of patients, respectively, and the incidence of discontinuations due to AEs was 0, 24, and 23 %, respectively. The lapatinib–pazopanib combination was associated with a numerically higher ORR but no increase in PFS compared to lapatinib alone. The combination also had increased toxicity resulting in more dose reductions, modifications, and treatment delays. Activity with single-agent lapatinib was confirmed in this population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3539065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35390652013-01-09 A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer Cristofanilli, Massimo Johnston, Stephen R. D. Manikhas, Alexey Gomez, Henry L. Gladkov, Oleg Shao, Zhimin Safina, Sufia Blackwell, Kimberly L. Alvarez, Ricardo H. Rubin, Stephen D. Ranganathan, Sulabha Redhu, Suman Trudeau, Maureen E. Breast Cancer Res Treat Clinical Trial This multi-center Phase II study evaluated lapatinib, pazopanib, and the combination in patients with relapsed HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer. In Cohort 1, 76 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive lapatinib 1,500 mg + placebo or lapatinib 1,500 mg + pazopanib 800 mg (double-blind) once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Due to high-grade diarrhea observed with this dose combination in another study (VEG20007), Cohort 1 was closed. The protocol was amended such that an additional 88 patients (Cohort 2) were randomized in a 5:5:2 ratio to receive daily monotherapy lapatinib 1,500 mg, lapatinib 1,000 mg + pazopanib 400 mg, or monotherapy pazopanib 800 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. In Cohort 1, ORR for the lapatinib (n = 38) and combination (n = 38) arms was 29 and 45 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.1 and 14.3 weeks, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the combination arm (71 %) than in the lapatinib arm (24 %). Dose reductions and interruptions due to AEs were also more frequent in the combination arm (45 and 53 %, respectively) than in the lapatinib monotherapy arm (0 and 11 %, respectively). In Cohort 2, ORR for patients treated with lapatinib (n = 36), lapatinib + pazopanib (n = 38), and pazopanib (n = 13) was 47, 58, and 31 %, respectively; median PFS was 16.0, 16.0, and 11.4 weeks, respectively. In the lapatinib, combination, and pazopanib therapy arms, grade ≥3 AEs were reported for 17, 50, and 46 % of patients, respectively, and the incidence of discontinuations due to AEs was 0, 24, and 23 %, respectively. The lapatinib–pazopanib combination was associated with a numerically higher ORR but no increase in PFS compared to lapatinib alone. The combination also had increased toxicity resulting in more dose reductions, modifications, and treatment delays. Activity with single-agent lapatinib was confirmed in this population. Springer US 2012-12-13 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3539065/ /pubmed/23239151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2369-x Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Cristofanilli, Massimo Johnston, Stephen R. D. Manikhas, Alexey Gomez, Henry L. Gladkov, Oleg Shao, Zhimin Safina, Sufia Blackwell, Kimberly L. Alvarez, Ricardo H. Rubin, Stephen D. Ranganathan, Sulabha Redhu, Suman Trudeau, Maureen E. A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer |
title | A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer |
title_full | A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer |
title_fullStr | A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer |
title_short | A randomized phase II study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with HER2+ inflammatory breast cancer |
title_sort | randomized phase ii study of lapatinib + pazopanib versus lapatinib in patients with her2+ inflammatory breast cancer |
topic | Clinical Trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23239151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2369-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cristofanillimassimo arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT johnstonstephenrd arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT manikhasalexey arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT gomezhenryl arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT gladkovoleg arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT shaozhimin arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT safinasufia arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT blackwellkimberlyl arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT alvarezricardoh arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT rubinstephend arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT ranganathansulabha arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT redhusuman arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT trudeaumaureene arandomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT cristofanillimassimo randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT johnstonstephenrd randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT manikhasalexey randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT gomezhenryl randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT gladkovoleg randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT shaozhimin randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT safinasufia randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT blackwellkimberlyl randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT alvarezricardoh randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT rubinstephend randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT ranganathansulabha randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT redhusuman randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer AT trudeaumaureene randomizedphaseiistudyoflapatinibpazopanibversuslapatinibinpatientswithher2inflammatorybreastcancer |