Cargando…
Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique
Bulk allograft reconstruction plays an important role in limb-salvage surgery; however, non-union has been reported in up to 27% of cases. The purpose of this study is to quantify average surface contact areas across simulated intraoperative osteotomies using both free-hand and computer-assisted nav...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/197540 |
_version_ | 1782255087818637312 |
---|---|
author | Lall, Ajay Hohn, Eric Kim, Mimi Y. Gorlick, Richard G. Abraham, John A. Geller, David S. |
author_facet | Lall, Ajay Hohn, Eric Kim, Mimi Y. Gorlick, Richard G. Abraham, John A. Geller, David S. |
author_sort | Lall, Ajay |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bulk allograft reconstruction plays an important role in limb-salvage surgery; however, non-union has been reported in up to 27% of cases. The purpose of this study is to quantify average surface contact areas across simulated intraoperative osteotomies using both free-hand and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Pressure-sensitive paper was positioned between two cut ends of a validated composite sawbone and compression was applied using an eight-hole large fragment dynamic compression plate. Thirty-two samples were analyzed for surface area contact to determine osteotomy congruity. Mean contact area using the free-hand osteotomy technique was equal to 0.21 square inches. Compared with a control of 0.69 square inches, average contact area was found to be 30.5% of optimal surface contact. Mean contact area using computer-assisted navigation was equal to 0.33 square inches. Compared with a control of 0.76 square inches, average contact area was found to be 43.7% of optimal surface contact. Limited contact achieved using standard techniques may play a role in the high rate of observed non-union, and an increase in contact area using computer-assisted navigation may improve rates of bone healing. The development of an oncology software package and navigation hardware may serve an important role in decreasing non-union rates in limb salvage surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3539445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-35394452013-01-14 Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique Lall, Ajay Hohn, Eric Kim, Mimi Y. Gorlick, Richard G. Abraham, John A. Geller, David S. Sarcoma Research Article Bulk allograft reconstruction plays an important role in limb-salvage surgery; however, non-union has been reported in up to 27% of cases. The purpose of this study is to quantify average surface contact areas across simulated intraoperative osteotomies using both free-hand and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Pressure-sensitive paper was positioned between two cut ends of a validated composite sawbone and compression was applied using an eight-hole large fragment dynamic compression plate. Thirty-two samples were analyzed for surface area contact to determine osteotomy congruity. Mean contact area using the free-hand osteotomy technique was equal to 0.21 square inches. Compared with a control of 0.69 square inches, average contact area was found to be 30.5% of optimal surface contact. Mean contact area using computer-assisted navigation was equal to 0.33 square inches. Compared with a control of 0.76 square inches, average contact area was found to be 43.7% of optimal surface contact. Limited contact achieved using standard techniques may play a role in the high rate of observed non-union, and an increase in contact area using computer-assisted navigation may improve rates of bone healing. The development of an oncology software package and navigation hardware may serve an important role in decreasing non-union rates in limb salvage surgery. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3539445/ /pubmed/23319879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/197540 Text en Copyright © 2012 Ajay Lall et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lall, Ajay Hohn, Eric Kim, Mimi Y. Gorlick, Richard G. Abraham, John A. Geller, David S. Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique |
title | Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique |
title_full | Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique |
title_short | Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique |
title_sort | comparison of surface area across the allograft-host junction site using conventional and navigated osteotomy technique |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/197540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lallajay comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique AT hohneric comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique AT kimmimiy comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique AT gorlickrichardg comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique AT abrahamjohna comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique AT gellerdavids comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique |