Cargando…

Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique

Bulk allograft reconstruction plays an important role in limb-salvage surgery; however, non-union has been reported in up to 27% of cases. The purpose of this study is to quantify average surface contact areas across simulated intraoperative osteotomies using both free-hand and computer-assisted nav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lall, Ajay, Hohn, Eric, Kim, Mimi Y., Gorlick, Richard G., Abraham, John A., Geller, David S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/197540
_version_ 1782255087818637312
author Lall, Ajay
Hohn, Eric
Kim, Mimi Y.
Gorlick, Richard G.
Abraham, John A.
Geller, David S.
author_facet Lall, Ajay
Hohn, Eric
Kim, Mimi Y.
Gorlick, Richard G.
Abraham, John A.
Geller, David S.
author_sort Lall, Ajay
collection PubMed
description Bulk allograft reconstruction plays an important role in limb-salvage surgery; however, non-union has been reported in up to 27% of cases. The purpose of this study is to quantify average surface contact areas across simulated intraoperative osteotomies using both free-hand and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Pressure-sensitive paper was positioned between two cut ends of a validated composite sawbone and compression was applied using an eight-hole large fragment dynamic compression plate. Thirty-two samples were analyzed for surface area contact to determine osteotomy congruity. Mean contact area using the free-hand osteotomy technique was equal to 0.21 square inches. Compared with a control of 0.69 square inches, average contact area was found to be 30.5% of optimal surface contact. Mean contact area using computer-assisted navigation was equal to 0.33 square inches. Compared with a control of 0.76 square inches, average contact area was found to be 43.7% of optimal surface contact. Limited contact achieved using standard techniques may play a role in the high rate of observed non-union, and an increase in contact area using computer-assisted navigation may improve rates of bone healing. The development of an oncology software package and navigation hardware may serve an important role in decreasing non-union rates in limb salvage surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3539445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-35394452013-01-14 Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique Lall, Ajay Hohn, Eric Kim, Mimi Y. Gorlick, Richard G. Abraham, John A. Geller, David S. Sarcoma Research Article Bulk allograft reconstruction plays an important role in limb-salvage surgery; however, non-union has been reported in up to 27% of cases. The purpose of this study is to quantify average surface contact areas across simulated intraoperative osteotomies using both free-hand and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Pressure-sensitive paper was positioned between two cut ends of a validated composite sawbone and compression was applied using an eight-hole large fragment dynamic compression plate. Thirty-two samples were analyzed for surface area contact to determine osteotomy congruity. Mean contact area using the free-hand osteotomy technique was equal to 0.21 square inches. Compared with a control of 0.69 square inches, average contact area was found to be 30.5% of optimal surface contact. Mean contact area using computer-assisted navigation was equal to 0.33 square inches. Compared with a control of 0.76 square inches, average contact area was found to be 43.7% of optimal surface contact. Limited contact achieved using standard techniques may play a role in the high rate of observed non-union, and an increase in contact area using computer-assisted navigation may improve rates of bone healing. The development of an oncology software package and navigation hardware may serve an important role in decreasing non-union rates in limb salvage surgery. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3539445/ /pubmed/23319879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/197540 Text en Copyright © 2012 Ajay Lall et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lall, Ajay
Hohn, Eric
Kim, Mimi Y.
Gorlick, Richard G.
Abraham, John A.
Geller, David S.
Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique
title Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique
title_full Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique
title_fullStr Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique
title_short Comparison of Surface Area across the Allograft-Host Junction Site Using Conventional and Navigated Osteotomy Technique
title_sort comparison of surface area across the allograft-host junction site using conventional and navigated osteotomy technique
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3539445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/197540
work_keys_str_mv AT lallajay comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique
AT hohneric comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique
AT kimmimiy comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique
AT gorlickrichardg comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique
AT abrahamjohna comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique
AT gellerdavids comparisonofsurfaceareaacrosstheallografthostjunctionsiteusingconventionalandnavigatedosteotomytechnique